Evaluation of two main RNA-seq approaches for gene quantification in clinical RNA sequencing: polyA+ selection versus rRNA depletion

• Published in: Scientific reports 2018-03, Vol.8 (1), p.4781-12, Article 4781
• Main Authors: Zhao, Shanrong, Zhang, Ying, Gamini, Ramya, Zhang, Baohong, von Schack, David
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 631/114/2163; 631/114/2785; 631/1647/48; Blood; Colon; Depletion; Gene expression; Genomes; Humanities and Social Sciences; Methods; multidisciplinary; Negative selection; Proteins; R&D; Research & development; rRNA; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Transcription
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23226-4

To allow efficient transcript/gene detection, highly abundant ribosomal RNAs (rRNA) are generally removed from total RNA either by positive polyA+ selection or by rRNA depletion (negative selection) before sequencing. Comparisons between the two methods have been carried out by various groups, but the assessments have relied largely on non-clinical samples. In this study, we evaluated these two RNA sequencing approaches using human blood and colon tissue samples. Our analyses showed that rRNA depletion captured more unique transcriptome features, whereas polyA+ selection outperformed rRNA depletion with higher exonic coverage and better accuracy of gene quantification. For blood- and colon-derived RNAs, we found that 220% and 50% more reads, respectively, would have to be sequenced to achieve the same level of exonic coverage in the rRNA depletion method compared with the polyA+ selection method. Therefore, in most cases we strongly recommend polyA+ selection over rRNA depletion for gene quantification in clinical RNA sequencing. Our evaluation revealed that a small number of lncRNAs and small RNAs made up a large fraction of the reads in the rRNA depletion RNA sequencing data. Thus, we recommend that these RNAs are specifically depleted to improve the sequencing depth of the remaining RNAs.