The sacral autonomic outflow is parasympathetic: Langley got it right

• Published in: Clinical autonomic research 2018-04, Vol.28 (2), p.181-185
• Main Author: Horn, John P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Autonomic Nervous System - physiology; Cardiology; Diabetes; Endocrinology; Gastroenterology; Gene expression; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurology; Neurons - physiology; Ophthalmology; Parasympathetic nervous system; Parasympathetic Nervous System - physiology; Review; Sacrum; Sacrum - innervation; Sacrum - physiology
• ISSN: 0959-9851; 1619-1560
• DOI: 10.1007/s10286-018-0510-6

A recent developmental study of gene expression by Espinosa-Medina, Brunet and colleagues sparked controversy by asserting a revised nomenclature for divisions of the autonomic motor system. Should we re-classify the sacral autonomic outflow as sympathetic, as now suggested, or does it rightly belong to the parasympathetic system, as defined by Langley nearly 100 years ago? Arguments for rejecting Espinosa-Medina, Brunet et al.’s scheme subsequently appeared in e-letters and brief reviews. A more recent commentary in this journal by Brunet and colleagues responded to these criticisms by labeling Langley’s scheme as a historical myth perpetuated by ignorance. In reaction to this heated exchange, I now examine both sides to the controversy, together with purported errors by the pioneers in the field. I then explain, once more, why the sacral outflow should remain known as parasympathetic, and outline suggestions for future experimentation to advance the understanding of cellular identity in the autonomic motor system.