Loading…

Varian HDR surface applicators — commissioning and clinical implementation

The purpose of this study was to validate the dosimetric performance of Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned and develop procedures for clinical implementation. The Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned provide a wide range of apertures making t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2016-03, Vol.17 (2), p.231-248
Main Authors: Iftimia, Ileana, McKee, Andrea B., Halvorsen, Per H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5411-9c8e778b719df2d3582c775cfd7f90925502f6a709cf0370c66ce33620e1b63e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5411-9c8e778b719df2d3582c775cfd7f90925502f6a709cf0370c66ce33620e1b63e3
container_end_page 248
container_issue 2
container_start_page 231
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 17
creator Iftimia, Ileana
McKee, Andrea B.
Halvorsen, Per H.
description The purpose of this study was to validate the dosimetric performance of Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned and develop procedures for clinical implementation. The Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned provide a wide range of apertures making them clinically advantageous, though the steep dose gradient in the region of 3‐4 mm prescription depth presents multiple challenges. The following commissioning tests were performed: 1) verification of functional integrity and physical dimensions; and 2) dosimetric measurements to validate data provided by Varian as well as data obtained using the Acuros algorithm for heterogeneity corrected dose calculation. A solid water (SW) phantom was scanned and the Acuros algorithm was used to compute the dose at 5 mm depth and at surface for all applicators. Two sets of reference dose measurements were performed, with the source positioned at (i) −10 mm and (ii) −15 mm from the center of the first nominal dwell position. Measurements were taken at 5 mm depth in a SW phantom and in air at the applicator surface. The results were then compared to the vendor's data and to the Acuros calculated dose. Relative dose measurements using Gafchromic films were taken at a depth of 4 mm in SW. Percent depth ionization (PDI) measurements using ion chamber were performed in SW. The profiles generated from film measurements and the PDI plots were compared with those computed using the Acuros algorithm and vendor's data, when available. Preliminary leakage tests were performed using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and the results were compared with Acuros predictions. All applicators were found to be functional with physical dimensions within 1 mm of specifications. For scenario (ii) measurements taken in SW at 5 mm depth and in air at the surface of each applicator were within 10% and 4% agreement with vendor's data, respectively. Compared with Acuros predictions, these measurements were within 6% and 5%, respectively. Measurements taken for scenario (i) showed reduced agreement with both the vendor's data as well as the Acuros calculations, especially when using the 10 mm applicator. The full widths of the measured dose profiles were within 2 mm of those predicted by Acuros at the 90% dose level. The PDI plots and measured leakage dose were in good agreement with vendor's data and Acuros predictions. Based on the dosimetric results, a quality assurance program and
doi_str_mv 10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.6033
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5874946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1781537887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5411-9c8e778b719df2d3582c775cfd7f90925502f6a709cf0370c66ce33620e1b63e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFDEYh4MotlbvnmTAi5dd3zeZyZ-LULbWCiuCqNeQzWRqlkwyJjuV3vwQ_YR-EtNuLdWLpwTe5_0lPx5CniMsESm83ho7TssLFJ4uOTD2gBxiR_lCKWwf3rsfkCelbAEQJZOPyQEVINpW8kOy_mqyN7E5O_nUlDkPxrrGTFPw1uxSLs2vn1eNTePoS_Ep-njemNg3NvhYidD4cQpudHFndnX8lDwaTCju2e15RL6cvv28OlusP757vzpeL2zXIi6UlU4IuRGo-oH2rJPUCtHZoReDAkW7DujAjQBlB2ACLOfWMcYpONxw5tgRebPPnebN6Hpb388m6Cn70eRLnYzXf0-i_6bP04XupGhVy2vAq9uAnL7Prux0LWhdCCa6NBeNQmLHhJSioi__QbdpzrHW05QqEAoRoFKwp2xOpWQ33H0GQV-r0jeq9I0qfa2qrry4X-Ju4Y-bCvA98MMHd_nfQH28-kCBMmS_AUOtozI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290791100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Varian HDR surface applicators — commissioning and clinical implementation</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Iftimia, Ileana ; McKee, Andrea B. ; Halvorsen, Per H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Iftimia, Ileana ; McKee, Andrea B. ; Halvorsen, Per H.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to validate the dosimetric performance of Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned and develop procedures for clinical implementation. The Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned provide a wide range of apertures making them clinically advantageous, though the steep dose gradient in the region of 3‐4 mm prescription depth presents multiple challenges. The following commissioning tests were performed: 1) verification of functional integrity and physical dimensions; and 2) dosimetric measurements to validate data provided by Varian as well as data obtained using the Acuros algorithm for heterogeneity corrected dose calculation. A solid water (SW) phantom was scanned and the Acuros algorithm was used to compute the dose at 5 mm depth and at surface for all applicators. Two sets of reference dose measurements were performed, with the source positioned at (i) −10 mm and (ii) −15 mm from the center of the first nominal dwell position. Measurements were taken at 5 mm depth in a SW phantom and in air at the applicator surface. The results were then compared to the vendor's data and to the Acuros calculated dose. Relative dose measurements using Gafchromic films were taken at a depth of 4 mm in SW. Percent depth ionization (PDI) measurements using ion chamber were performed in SW. The profiles generated from film measurements and the PDI plots were compared with those computed using the Acuros algorithm and vendor's data, when available. Preliminary leakage tests were performed using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and the results were compared with Acuros predictions. All applicators were found to be functional with physical dimensions within 1 mm of specifications. For scenario (ii) measurements taken in SW at 5 mm depth and in air at the surface of each applicator were within 10% and 4% agreement with vendor's data, respectively. Compared with Acuros predictions, these measurements were within 6% and 5%, respectively. Measurements taken for scenario (i) showed reduced agreement with both the vendor's data as well as the Acuros calculations, especially when using the 10 mm applicator. The full widths of the measured dose profiles were within 2 mm of those predicted by Acuros at the 90% dose level. The PDI plots and measured leakage dose were in good agreement with vendor's data and Acuros predictions. Based on the dosimetric results, a quality assurance program and procedures for clinical implementation were developed. Treatment planning will be performed using scenario (ii). The 10 mm applicator will not be released for clinical use. A prescription depth of 4 mm is recommended, to ensure full coverage at 3 mm and a minimum dose of 90% of prescribed dose at 4 mm depth. PACS number(s): 87.55 Qr, 87.56 Da, 87.90 +y</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.6033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27074486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Brachytherapy - instrumentation ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Cancer therapies ; Dosimetry ; Humans ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photons ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiation therapy ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Scattering, Radiation ; Skin cancer ; source vertically positioned ; surface applicators</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2016-03, Vol.17 (2), p.231-248</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors.</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5411-9c8e778b719df2d3582c775cfd7f90925502f6a709cf0370c66ce33620e1b63e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5411-9c8e778b719df2d3582c775cfd7f90925502f6a709cf0370c66ce33620e1b63e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290791100/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290791100?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074486$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iftimia, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Per H.</creatorcontrib><title>Varian HDR surface applicators — commissioning and clinical implementation</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to validate the dosimetric performance of Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned and develop procedures for clinical implementation. The Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned provide a wide range of apertures making them clinically advantageous, though the steep dose gradient in the region of 3‐4 mm prescription depth presents multiple challenges. The following commissioning tests were performed: 1) verification of functional integrity and physical dimensions; and 2) dosimetric measurements to validate data provided by Varian as well as data obtained using the Acuros algorithm for heterogeneity corrected dose calculation. A solid water (SW) phantom was scanned and the Acuros algorithm was used to compute the dose at 5 mm depth and at surface for all applicators. Two sets of reference dose measurements were performed, with the source positioned at (i) −10 mm and (ii) −15 mm from the center of the first nominal dwell position. Measurements were taken at 5 mm depth in a SW phantom and in air at the applicator surface. The results were then compared to the vendor's data and to the Acuros calculated dose. Relative dose measurements using Gafchromic films were taken at a depth of 4 mm in SW. Percent depth ionization (PDI) measurements using ion chamber were performed in SW. The profiles generated from film measurements and the PDI plots were compared with those computed using the Acuros algorithm and vendor's data, when available. Preliminary leakage tests were performed using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and the results were compared with Acuros predictions. All applicators were found to be functional with physical dimensions within 1 mm of specifications. For scenario (ii) measurements taken in SW at 5 mm depth and in air at the surface of each applicator were within 10% and 4% agreement with vendor's data, respectively. Compared with Acuros predictions, these measurements were within 6% and 5%, respectively. Measurements taken for scenario (i) showed reduced agreement with both the vendor's data as well as the Acuros calculations, especially when using the 10 mm applicator. The full widths of the measured dose profiles were within 2 mm of those predicted by Acuros at the 90% dose level. The PDI plots and measured leakage dose were in good agreement with vendor's data and Acuros predictions. Based on the dosimetric results, a quality assurance program and procedures for clinical implementation were developed. Treatment planning will be performed using scenario (ii). The 10 mm applicator will not be released for clinical use. A prescription depth of 4 mm is recommended, to ensure full coverage at 3 mm and a minimum dose of 90% of prescribed dose at 4 mm depth. PACS number(s): 87.55 Qr, 87.56 Da, 87.90 +y</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>source vertically positioned</subject><subject>surface applicators</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFDEYh4MotlbvnmTAi5dd3zeZyZ-LULbWCiuCqNeQzWRqlkwyJjuV3vwQ_YR-EtNuLdWLpwTe5_0lPx5CniMsESm83ho7TssLFJ4uOTD2gBxiR_lCKWwf3rsfkCelbAEQJZOPyQEVINpW8kOy_mqyN7E5O_nUlDkPxrrGTFPw1uxSLs2vn1eNTePoS_Ep-njemNg3NvhYidD4cQpudHFndnX8lDwaTCju2e15RL6cvv28OlusP757vzpeL2zXIi6UlU4IuRGo-oH2rJPUCtHZoReDAkW7DujAjQBlB2ACLOfWMcYpONxw5tgRebPPnebN6Hpb388m6Cn70eRLnYzXf0-i_6bP04XupGhVy2vAq9uAnL7Prux0LWhdCCa6NBeNQmLHhJSioi__QbdpzrHW05QqEAoRoFKwp2xOpWQ33H0GQV-r0jeq9I0qfa2qrry4X-Ju4Y-bCvA98MMHd_nfQH28-kCBMmS_AUOtozI</recordid><startdate>20160308</startdate><enddate>20160308</enddate><creator>Iftimia, Ileana</creator><creator>McKee, Andrea B.</creator><creator>Halvorsen, Per H.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160308</creationdate><title>Varian HDR surface applicators — commissioning and clinical implementation</title><author>Iftimia, Ileana ; McKee, Andrea B. ; Halvorsen, Per H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5411-9c8e778b719df2d3582c775cfd7f90925502f6a709cf0370c66ce33620e1b63e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>source vertically positioned</topic><topic>surface applicators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iftimia, Ileana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, Andrea B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Per H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iftimia, Ileana</au><au>McKee, Andrea B.</au><au>Halvorsen, Per H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Varian HDR surface applicators — commissioning and clinical implementation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2016-03-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>231-248</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to validate the dosimetric performance of Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned and develop procedures for clinical implementation. The Varian surface applicators with the source vertically positioned provide a wide range of apertures making them clinically advantageous, though the steep dose gradient in the region of 3‐4 mm prescription depth presents multiple challenges. The following commissioning tests were performed: 1) verification of functional integrity and physical dimensions; and 2) dosimetric measurements to validate data provided by Varian as well as data obtained using the Acuros algorithm for heterogeneity corrected dose calculation. A solid water (SW) phantom was scanned and the Acuros algorithm was used to compute the dose at 5 mm depth and at surface for all applicators. Two sets of reference dose measurements were performed, with the source positioned at (i) −10 mm and (ii) −15 mm from the center of the first nominal dwell position. Measurements were taken at 5 mm depth in a SW phantom and in air at the applicator surface. The results were then compared to the vendor's data and to the Acuros calculated dose. Relative dose measurements using Gafchromic films were taken at a depth of 4 mm in SW. Percent depth ionization (PDI) measurements using ion chamber were performed in SW. The profiles generated from film measurements and the PDI plots were compared with those computed using the Acuros algorithm and vendor's data, when available. Preliminary leakage tests were performed using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and the results were compared with Acuros predictions. All applicators were found to be functional with physical dimensions within 1 mm of specifications. For scenario (ii) measurements taken in SW at 5 mm depth and in air at the surface of each applicator were within 10% and 4% agreement with vendor's data, respectively. Compared with Acuros predictions, these measurements were within 6% and 5%, respectively. Measurements taken for scenario (i) showed reduced agreement with both the vendor's data as well as the Acuros calculations, especially when using the 10 mm applicator. The full widths of the measured dose profiles were within 2 mm of those predicted by Acuros at the 90% dose level. The PDI plots and measured leakage dose were in good agreement with vendor's data and Acuros predictions. Based on the dosimetric results, a quality assurance program and procedures for clinical implementation were developed. Treatment planning will be performed using scenario (ii). The 10 mm applicator will not be released for clinical use. A prescription depth of 4 mm is recommended, to ensure full coverage at 3 mm and a minimum dose of 90% of prescribed dose at 4 mm depth. PACS number(s): 87.55 Qr, 87.56 Da, 87.90 +y</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>27074486</pmid><doi>10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.6033</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2016-03, Vol.17 (2), p.231-248
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5874946
source Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Algorithms
Brachytherapy - instrumentation
Brachytherapy - methods
Cancer therapies
Dosimetry
Humans
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Phantoms, Imaging
Photons
Radiation Oncology Physics
Radiation therapy
Radiometry - methods
Radiotherapy Dosage
Scattering, Radiation
Skin cancer
source vertically positioned
surface applicators
title Varian HDR surface applicators — commissioning and clinical implementation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A59%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Varian%20HDR%20surface%20applicators%20%E2%80%94%20commissioning%20and%20clinical%20implementation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Iftimia,%20Ileana&rft.date=2016-03-08&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=231-248&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.6033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1781537887%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5411-9c8e778b719df2d3582c775cfd7f90925502f6a709cf0370c66ce33620e1b63e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290791100&rft_id=info:pmid/27074486&rfr_iscdi=true