Loading…
Revealed Preference Methods for Studying Bicycle Route Choice-A Systematic Review
One fundamental aspect of promoting utilitarian bicycle use involves making modifications to the built environment to improve the safety, efficiency and enjoyability of cycling. Revealed preference data on bicycle route choice can assist greatly in understanding the actual behaviour of a highly hete...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2018-03, Vol.15 (3), p.470 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-878d239bfcdba1729175cc0b7bbca242113afe2d0cc3117ab45d2fc3a5923bd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-878d239bfcdba1729175cc0b7bbca242113afe2d0cc3117ab45d2fc3a5923bd3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 470 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Pritchard, Ray |
description | One fundamental aspect of promoting utilitarian bicycle use involves making modifications to the built environment to improve the safety, efficiency and enjoyability of cycling. Revealed preference data on bicycle route choice can assist greatly in understanding the actual behaviour of a highly heterogeneous group of users, which in turn assists the prioritisation of infrastructure or other built environment initiatives. This systematic review seeks to compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of the empirical approaches for evaluating whole journey route choices of bicyclists. Two electronic databases were systematically searched for a selection of keywords pertaining to bicycle and route choice. In total seven families of methods are identified: GPS devices, smartphone applications, crowdsourcing, participant-recalled routes, accompanied journeys, egocentric cameras and virtual reality. The study illustrates a trade-off in the quality of data obtainable and the average number of participants. Future additional methods could include dockless bikeshare, multiple camera solutions using computer vision and immersive bicycle simulator environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph15030470 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5877015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2012913014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-878d239bfcdba1729175cc0b7bbca242113afe2d0cc3117ab45d2fc3a5923bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxa2KqlDotUdkiUsvoTO2EycXJLpqSyWqlo-75dgT1qtsvNgJ1f73DeJDwGlGmjc_zZvH2GeEYykb-BpWlDZLLEGC0vCO7WFVQaEqwJ0X_S77mPMKQNaqaj6wXdGUWDcN7rGLS7oj25PnfxN1lGhwxH_TuIw-8y4mfjVOfhuGG_4tuK3riV_GaSS-WMbgqDjlV9s80tqOwfEZFejfAXvf2T7Tp8e6z65_fL9enBXnf37-WpyeF06paixqXXshm7ZzvrWoRYO6dA5a3bbOCiUQpe1IeHBOImrbqtKLzklbNkK2Xu6zkwfsZmrX5B0NY7K92aSwtmlrog3m9WQIS3MT70xZaw1YzoAvj4AUbyfKo1mH7Kjv7UBxykYAzkdJQDVLj95IV3FKw-zOCIRagar1PfD4QeVSzHn-5vMxCOY-LPM6rHnh8KWFZ_lTOvI_S4WR4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108404875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revealed Preference Methods for Studying Bicycle Route Choice-A Systematic Review</title><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pritchard, Ray</creator><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, Ray</creatorcontrib><description>One fundamental aspect of promoting utilitarian bicycle use involves making modifications to the built environment to improve the safety, efficiency and enjoyability of cycling. Revealed preference data on bicycle route choice can assist greatly in understanding the actual behaviour of a highly heterogeneous group of users, which in turn assists the prioritisation of infrastructure or other built environment initiatives. This systematic review seeks to compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of the empirical approaches for evaluating whole journey route choices of bicyclists. Two electronic databases were systematically searched for a selection of keywords pertaining to bicycle and route choice. In total seven families of methods are identified: GPS devices, smartphone applications, crowdsourcing, participant-recalled routes, accompanied journeys, egocentric cameras and virtual reality. The study illustrates a trade-off in the quality of data obtainable and the average number of participants. Future additional methods could include dockless bikeshare, multiple camera solutions using computer vision and immersive bicycle simulator environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15030470</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29518991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Bicycles ; Bicycling ; Cameras ; Choice Behavior ; Computer applications ; Computer simulation ; Computer vision ; Data collection ; Exercise ; Geographic Information Systems ; Grey literature ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Infrastructure ; Methods ; Outdoor air quality ; Preferences ; Review ; Route choice ; Route selection ; Smartphone ; Smartphones ; Studies ; Travel ; Urban areas ; Urban environments ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018-03, Vol.15 (3), p.470</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 by the author. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-878d239bfcdba1729175cc0b7bbca242113afe2d0cc3117ab45d2fc3a5923bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-878d239bfcdba1729175cc0b7bbca242113afe2d0cc3117ab45d2fc3a5923bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8438-7112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108404875/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108404875?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29518991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, Ray</creatorcontrib><title>Revealed Preference Methods for Studying Bicycle Route Choice-A Systematic Review</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>One fundamental aspect of promoting utilitarian bicycle use involves making modifications to the built environment to improve the safety, efficiency and enjoyability of cycling. Revealed preference data on bicycle route choice can assist greatly in understanding the actual behaviour of a highly heterogeneous group of users, which in turn assists the prioritisation of infrastructure or other built environment initiatives. This systematic review seeks to compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of the empirical approaches for evaluating whole journey route choices of bicyclists. Two electronic databases were systematically searched for a selection of keywords pertaining to bicycle and route choice. In total seven families of methods are identified: GPS devices, smartphone applications, crowdsourcing, participant-recalled routes, accompanied journeys, egocentric cameras and virtual reality. The study illustrates a trade-off in the quality of data obtainable and the average number of participants. Future additional methods could include dockless bikeshare, multiple camera solutions using computer vision and immersive bicycle simulator environments.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Grey literature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Route choice</subject><subject>Route selection</subject><subject>Smartphone</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxa2KqlDotUdkiUsvoTO2EycXJLpqSyWqlo-75dgT1qtsvNgJ1f73DeJDwGlGmjc_zZvH2GeEYykb-BpWlDZLLEGC0vCO7WFVQaEqwJ0X_S77mPMKQNaqaj6wXdGUWDcN7rGLS7oj25PnfxN1lGhwxH_TuIw-8y4mfjVOfhuGG_4tuK3riV_GaSS-WMbgqDjlV9s80tqOwfEZFejfAXvf2T7Tp8e6z65_fL9enBXnf37-WpyeF06paixqXXshm7ZzvrWoRYO6dA5a3bbOCiUQpe1IeHBOImrbqtKLzklbNkK2Xu6zkwfsZmrX5B0NY7K92aSwtmlrog3m9WQIS3MT70xZaw1YzoAvj4AUbyfKo1mH7Kjv7UBxykYAzkdJQDVLj95IV3FKw-zOCIRagar1PfD4QeVSzHn-5vMxCOY-LPM6rHnh8KWFZ_lTOvI_S4WR4w</recordid><startdate>20180307</startdate><enddate>20180307</enddate><creator>Pritchard, Ray</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-7112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180307</creationdate><title>Revealed Preference Methods for Studying Bicycle Route Choice-A Systematic Review</title><author>Pritchard, Ray</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-878d239bfcdba1729175cc0b7bbca242113afe2d0cc3117ab45d2fc3a5923bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Grey literature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Route choice</topic><topic>Route selection</topic><topic>Smartphone</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, Ray</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pritchard, Ray</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revealed Preference Methods for Studying Bicycle Route Choice-A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2018-03-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>470</spage><pages>470-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>One fundamental aspect of promoting utilitarian bicycle use involves making modifications to the built environment to improve the safety, efficiency and enjoyability of cycling. Revealed preference data on bicycle route choice can assist greatly in understanding the actual behaviour of a highly heterogeneous group of users, which in turn assists the prioritisation of infrastructure or other built environment initiatives. This systematic review seeks to compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of the empirical approaches for evaluating whole journey route choices of bicyclists. Two electronic databases were systematically searched for a selection of keywords pertaining to bicycle and route choice. In total seven families of methods are identified: GPS devices, smartphone applications, crowdsourcing, participant-recalled routes, accompanied journeys, egocentric cameras and virtual reality. The study illustrates a trade-off in the quality of data obtainable and the average number of participants. Future additional methods could include dockless bikeshare, multiple camera solutions using computer vision and immersive bicycle simulator environments.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>29518991</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph15030470</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-7112</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018-03, Vol.15 (3), p.470 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5877015 |
source | Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Air pollution Bicycles Bicycling Cameras Choice Behavior Computer applications Computer simulation Computer vision Data collection Exercise Geographic Information Systems Grey literature Humans Identification methods Infrastructure Methods Outdoor air quality Preferences Review Route choice Route selection Smartphone Smartphones Studies Travel Urban areas Urban environments Virtual reality |
title | Revealed Preference Methods for Studying Bicycle Route Choice-A Systematic Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A25%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revealed%20Preference%20Methods%20for%20Studying%20Bicycle%20Route%20Choice-A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Pritchard,%20Ray&rft.date=2018-03-07&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=470&rft.pages=470-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph15030470&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2012913014%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-878d239bfcdba1729175cc0b7bbca242113afe2d0cc3117ab45d2fc3a5923bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108404875&rft_id=info:pmid/29518991&rfr_iscdi=true |