Do local antibiotics reduce periprosthetic joint infections? A retrospective review of 744 cases

• Published in: Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 2018-03, Vol.9 (Suppl 1), p.S34-S39
• Main Authors: Winkler, Craig, Dennison, Joel, Wooldridge, Adam, Larumbe, Eneko, Caroom, Cyrus, Jenkins, Mark, Brindley, George
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: General Orthopaedics; Orthopedics
• ISSN: 0976-5662; 2213-3445
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.007

Abstract Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are uncommon but not rare and have significant morbidity and financial implications. Local antibiotics have been used successfully in other areas of orthopedics to reduce postoperative infections, but this method has not been proven in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Beginning January 1, 2014, our primary investigators began using surgical site lavage with providone-iodine solution and administering 2 g of vancomcyin powder in the surgical wound prior to capsule closure for all primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients two years prior to this date and two years after to compare occurrence of PJI. The groups were broken down into patients who received local antibiotics versus those who did not. The groups were further broken down by type of surgery performed; primary or revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. Administration of local antibiotics was preventative for PJI only in the primary total knee arthroplasty group (aOR = 0.28, 0.09–0.89). Administration of local antibiotics trended towards a preventative effect for PJI in the other groups but was not statistically significant. Patients receiving local antibiotics had similar blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels postoperatively compared to the no antibiotics group indicating minimal systemic effects of local vancomycin powder. While the use of local antibiotics may prevent PJI, more data is required especially in the revision arthroplasty groups.