Early-Pregnancy Plasma Concentrations of Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Birth Outcomes in Project Viva: Confounded by Pregnancy Hemodynamics?

• Published in: American journal of epidemiology 2018-04, Vol.187 (4), p.793-802
• Main Authors: Sagiv, Sharon K, Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl L, Fleisch, Abby F, Webster, Thomas F, Calafat, Antonia M, Ye, Xiaoyun, Gillman, Matthew W, Oken, Emily
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Albumin; Albumins; Birth weight; Confidence intervals; Creatinine; Gestation; Gestational age; Glomerular filtration rate; Health risk assessment; Hemodynamics; Markers; Organic chemistry; Perfluoro compounds; Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances; Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid; Practice of Epidemiology; Pregnancy; Premature birth; Prenatal experience; Prenatal exposure; Water resistance; Weight
• ISSN: 0002-9262; 1476-6256
• DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx332

Abstract Associations of prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), ubiquitous chemicals used in stain- and water-resistant products, with adverse birth outcomes may be confounded by pregnancy hemodynamics. We measured plasma concentrations of 4 PFAS in early pregnancy (median length of gestation, 9 weeks) among 1,645 women in Project Viva, a study of a birth cohort recruited during 1999–2002 in eastern Massachusetts. We fitted multivariable models to estimate associations of PFAS with birth weight-for-gestational age z score and length of gestation, adjusting for sociodemographic confounders and 2 hemodynamic markers: 1) plasma albumin concentration, a measure of plasma volume expansion, and 2) plasma creatinine concentration, used to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorononanoate (PFNA) were weakly inversely associated with birth weight-for-gestational age z scores (adjusted β = −0.04 (95% confidence interval (CI): −0.08, 0.01) and adjusted β = −0.06 (95% CI: −0.11, −0.01) per interquartile-range increase, respectively). PFOS and PFNA were also associated with higher odds of preterm birth (e.g., for highest PFOS quartile vs. lowest, adjusted odds ratio = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3, 4.4). Adjusting for markers of pregnancy hemodynamics (glomerular filtration rate and plasma albumin), to the extent that they accurately reflect underlying pregnancy physiology, did not materially affect associations. These results suggest that pregnancy hemodynamics may not confound associations with birth outcomes when PFAS are measured early in pregnancy.