Loading…

Efficacy of neratinib in the treatment of HER2/neu-amplified epithelial ovarian carcinoma in vitro and in vivo

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. There is a need to optimize the currently available treatment strategies and to urgently develop novel therapeutic agents against chemotherapy-resistant disease. The objective of our study was to evaluate neratinib’s precli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) London, England), 2017-05, Vol.34 (5), p.91-91, Article 91
Main Authors: Menderes, Gulden, Bonazzoli, Elena, Bellone, Stefania, Black, Jonathan D., Lopez, Salvatore, Pettinella, Francesca, Masserdotti, Alice, Zammataro, Luca, Litkouhi, Babak, Ratner, Elena, Silasi, Dan-Arin, Azodi, Masoud, Schwartz, Peter E., Santin, Alessandro D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Epithelial ovarian carcinoma is the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. There is a need to optimize the currently available treatment strategies and to urgently develop novel therapeutic agents against chemotherapy-resistant disease. The objective of our study was to evaluate neratinib’s preclinical efficacy in treating HER2-amplified ovarian cancer. Neratinib’s efficacy in treating HER2-amplified ovarian cancer was studied in vitro utilizing six primary tumor cell lines with differential HER2/neu expression. Flow cytometry was utilized to assess IC 50 , cell signaling changes, and cell cycle distribution. Neratinib’s in vivo efficacy was evaluated in HER2-amplified epithelial ovarian carcinoma xenografts. Three of six (50%) ovarian cancer cell lines were HER2/neu-amplified. Neratinib showed significantly higher efficacy in treating HER2/neu-amplified cell lines when compared to the non-HER2/neu-amplified tumor cell lines (mean ± SEM IC 50 :0.010 μM ± 0.0003 vs. 0.076 μM ± 0.005 p  
ISSN:1357-0560
1559-131X
DOI:10.1007/s12032-017-0956-8