Loading…
The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics
For decisions in the wild, time is of the essence. Available decision time is often cut short through natural or artificial constraints, or is impinged upon by the opportunity cost of time. Experimental economists have only recently begun to conduct experiments with time constraints and to analyze r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association 2018-06, Vol.21 (2), p.383-433 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-64b818c199bdeee0465a5339b228ac87a0071ff74ebe8e354b7880498966c3713 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-64b818c199bdeee0465a5339b228ac87a0071ff74ebe8e354b7880498966c3713 |
container_end_page | 433 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Spiliopoulos, Leonidas Ortmann, Andreas |
description | For decisions in the wild, time is of the essence. Available decision time is often cut short through natural or artificial constraints, or is impinged upon by the opportunity cost of time. Experimental economists have only recently begun to conduct experiments with time constraints and to analyze response time (RT) data, in contrast to experimental psychologists. RT analysis has proven valuable for the identification of individual and strategic decision processes including identification of social preferences in the latter case, model comparison/selection, and the investigation of heuristics that combine speed and performance by exploiting environmental regularities. Here we focus on the benefits, challenges, and desiderata of RT analysis in strategic decision making. We argue that unlocking the potential of RT analysis requires the adoption of process-based models instead of outcome-based models, and discuss how RT in the wild can be captured by time-constrained experiments in the lab. We conclude that RT analysis holds considerable potential for experimental economics, deserves greater attention as a methodological tool, and promises important insights on strategic decision making in naturally occurring environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5913387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2034292268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-64b818c199bdeee0465a5339b228ac87a0071ff74ebe8e354b7880498966c3713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVqs_wI0MuHEzmsdMHgiC1icU3NR1yKR32ikzkzFpxf57U1rrA1wl3Pvl5Nx7EDoh-IJgLC4DwVyyFBORqpzKlOygA5ILlnLF5G68M8nTLFZ66DCEGcaE5DzbRz2qBMVSqgN0NZpCcju4S1yZeAidawMk86qBxLSmXoYqJFWbwEcHPhbbuakTsK51TWXDEdorTR3geHP20evD_WjwlA5fHp8HN8PUckzmKc8KSaQlShVjAMAZz03OmCoolcZKYeIopCxFBgVIYHlWCClxpqTi3DJBWB9dr3W7RdHA2EYb3tS6i46MX2pnKv2701ZTPXHvOleEMSmiwPlGwLu3BYS5bqpgoa5NC24RNMUso4rSuMw-OvuDztzCx1WsKKqYojlnkSJrynoXgodya4ZgvYpGr6PRMRq9ikavpjj9OcX2xVcWEaBrIMRWOwH__fX_qp9V0JhK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2029392563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Spiliopoulos, Leonidas ; Ortmann, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Spiliopoulos, Leonidas ; Ortmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>For decisions in the wild, time is of the essence. Available decision time is often cut short through natural or artificial constraints, or is impinged upon by the opportunity cost of time. Experimental economists have only recently begun to conduct experiments with time constraints and to analyze response time (RT) data, in contrast to experimental psychologists. RT analysis has proven valuable for the identification of individual and strategic decision processes including identification of social preferences in the latter case, model comparison/selection, and the investigation of heuristics that combine speed and performance by exploiting environmental regularities. Here we focus on the benefits, challenges, and desiderata of RT analysis in strategic decision making. We argue that unlocking the potential of RT analysis requires the adoption of process-based models instead of outcome-based models, and discuss how RT in the wild can be captured by time-constrained experiments in the lab. We conclude that RT analysis holds considerable potential for experimental economics, deserves greater attention as a methodological tool, and promises important insights on strategic decision making in naturally occurring environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-4157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29720889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavioral/Experimental Economics ; Decision making ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Economists ; Experimental economics ; Game Theory ; Heuristic ; Microeconomics ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Paper ; Psychologists ; Reaction time ; Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><ispartof>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association, 2018-06, Vol.21 (2), p.383-433</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Experimental Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-64b818c199bdeee0465a5339b228ac87a0071ff74ebe8e354b7880498966c3713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-64b818c199bdeee0465a5339b228ac87a0071ff74ebe8e354b7880498966c3713</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9154-2160</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2029392563/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2029392563?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29720889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spiliopoulos, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics</title><title>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</title><addtitle>Exp Econ</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Econ</addtitle><description>For decisions in the wild, time is of the essence. Available decision time is often cut short through natural or artificial constraints, or is impinged upon by the opportunity cost of time. Experimental economists have only recently begun to conduct experiments with time constraints and to analyze response time (RT) data, in contrast to experimental psychologists. RT analysis has proven valuable for the identification of individual and strategic decision processes including identification of social preferences in the latter case, model comparison/selection, and the investigation of heuristics that combine speed and performance by exploiting environmental regularities. Here we focus on the benefits, challenges, and desiderata of RT analysis in strategic decision making. We argue that unlocking the potential of RT analysis requires the adoption of process-based models instead of outcome-based models, and discuss how RT in the wild can be captured by time-constrained experiments in the lab. We conclude that RT analysis holds considerable potential for experimental economics, deserves greater attention as a methodological tool, and promises important insights on strategic decision making in naturally occurring environments.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Experimental economics</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><issn>1386-4157</issn><issn>1573-6938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVqs_wI0MuHEzmsdMHgiC1icU3NR1yKR32ikzkzFpxf57U1rrA1wl3Pvl5Nx7EDoh-IJgLC4DwVyyFBORqpzKlOygA5ILlnLF5G68M8nTLFZ66DCEGcaE5DzbRz2qBMVSqgN0NZpCcju4S1yZeAidawMk86qBxLSmXoYqJFWbwEcHPhbbuakTsK51TWXDEdorTR3geHP20evD_WjwlA5fHp8HN8PUckzmKc8KSaQlShVjAMAZz03OmCoolcZKYeIopCxFBgVIYHlWCClxpqTi3DJBWB9dr3W7RdHA2EYb3tS6i46MX2pnKv2701ZTPXHvOleEMSmiwPlGwLu3BYS5bqpgoa5NC24RNMUso4rSuMw-OvuDztzCx1WsKKqYojlnkSJrynoXgodya4ZgvYpGr6PRMRq9ikavpjj9OcX2xVcWEaBrIMRWOwH__fX_qp9V0JhK</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Spiliopoulos, Leonidas</creator><creator>Ortmann, Andreas</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9154-2160</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics</title><author>Spiliopoulos, Leonidas ; Ortmann, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-64b818c199bdeee0465a5339b228ac87a0071ff74ebe8e354b7880498966c3713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Experimental economics</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spiliopoulos, Leonidas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortmann, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spiliopoulos, Leonidas</au><au>Ortmann, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics</atitle><jtitle>Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association</jtitle><stitle>Exp Econ</stitle><addtitle>Exp Econ</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>383-433</pages><issn>1386-4157</issn><eissn>1573-6938</eissn><abstract>For decisions in the wild, time is of the essence. Available decision time is often cut short through natural or artificial constraints, or is impinged upon by the opportunity cost of time. Experimental economists have only recently begun to conduct experiments with time constraints and to analyze response time (RT) data, in contrast to experimental psychologists. RT analysis has proven valuable for the identification of individual and strategic decision processes including identification of social preferences in the latter case, model comparison/selection, and the investigation of heuristics that combine speed and performance by exploiting environmental regularities. Here we focus on the benefits, challenges, and desiderata of RT analysis in strategic decision making. We argue that unlocking the potential of RT analysis requires the adoption of process-based models instead of outcome-based models, and discuss how RT in the wild can be captured by time-constrained experiments in the lab. We conclude that RT analysis holds considerable potential for experimental economics, deserves greater attention as a methodological tool, and promises important insights on strategic decision making in naturally occurring environments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29720889</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1</doi><tpages>51</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9154-2160</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-4157 |
ispartof | Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association, 2018-06, Vol.21 (2), p.383-433 |
issn | 1386-4157 1573-6938 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5913387 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Analysis Behavioral/Experimental Economics Decision making Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Economists Experimental economics Game Theory Heuristic Microeconomics Operations Research/Decision Theory Original Paper Psychologists Reaction time Social and Behav. Sciences |
title | The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A57%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20BCD%20of%20response%20time%20analysis%20in%20experimental%20economics&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20economics%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20the%20Economic%20Science%20Association&rft.au=Spiliopoulos,%20Leonidas&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=383-433&rft.issn=1386-4157&rft.eissn=1573-6938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10683-017-9528-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2034292268%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-64b818c199bdeee0465a5339b228ac87a0071ff74ebe8e354b7880498966c3713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2029392563&rft_id=info:pmid/29720889&rfr_iscdi=true |