Loading…

Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth‐year Emergency Medicine Clerkships

Background Medical student grades during emergency medicine (EM) rotations are a key factor in resident selection. The variability in grading among EM clerkships is not well understood. Objective The objective was to describe the current grade distribution of fourth‐year EM clerkships. Methods This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AEM education and training 2017-04, Vol.1 (2), p.81-86
Main Authors: Hall, Matthew M., Dubosh, Nicole M., Ullman, Edward, DeIorio, Nicole M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-2882e779ecc530cb7a2d0a14717997fed73c8781689379866c11b9c9d939ae9e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-2882e779ecc530cb7a2d0a14717997fed73c8781689379866c11b9c9d939ae9e3
container_end_page 86
container_issue 2
container_start_page 81
container_title AEM education and training
container_volume 1
creator Hall, Matthew M.
Dubosh, Nicole M.
Ullman, Edward
DeIorio, Nicole M.
description Background Medical student grades during emergency medicine (EM) rotations are a key factor in resident selection. The variability in grading among EM clerkships is not well understood. Objective The objective was to describe the current grade distribution of fourth‐year EM clerkships. Methods This was an observational study at an EM residency program. We identified grade distributions by reviewing the standard letter of evaluation from individuals applying to our residency program for the 2016 match. Descriptive statistics of proportions, standard deviations (SDs), and p‐values were calculated. Results A total of 1,075 applications from 236 individual clerkships were reviewed. Thirty‐four programs did not give an honors grade during the previous year. Four of these programs distributed a highest grade of “high pass” and 30 gave only “pass” and/or “fail.” Of the remaining 202 programs, the percentage of grades that were given as honors ranged from 1% to 87% with a mean (±SD) of 25% (±17.2%). Of the 202 programs that granted honors grades, 63 (31.2%) sites gave between 1 and 14.9% honors grades, 69 (34.2%) gave 15% to 29.9% honors grades, 27 (13.4%) gave 30% to 44.9% honors grades, and 24 (11.9%) programs granted honors to greater than 45% of their students. Medical schools required an EM rotation at 82 (40.6%) sites. Among these programs, honors grades were given to 24% (±16.7%) of students with a range of 4% to 85% while programs that did not require clerkships gave a mean (±SD) of 26% (±17.5%) with a range of 1% to 87% and a p‐value of 0.54. Conclusions Honor grade distribution varies markedly across U.S. fourth‐year EM clerkship sites. Requiring EM clerkships does not affect honor percentages. A minority of sites only give pass/fail grades. Program directors should consider this marked variation in grades when reviewing EM residency applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aet2.10018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6001727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2078579988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-2882e779ecc530cb7a2d0a14717997fed73c8781689379866c11b9c9d939ae9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1OAjEUhRujEYJsfAAzS2OCth1m2m5MCPJjgtEFrpvSuQPVYYrtjIadj-Az-iTOABLcuLonuV_OvTkHoXOCrwnG9EZBQWtF-BFq0i6jnSgU-PhAN1Db-xdcI92IYHqKGiHGlSJREz3dGV84MysLY_PApsHY5tb5YORUAj7oaWe9D4a2dMXi-_NrDcoFgyW4OeR6HTxAYrTJIehn4F79wqz8GTpJVeahvZst9DwcTPvjzuRxdN_vTTq6SzHvUM4pMCZA6yjEesYUTbAiXUaYECyFhIWaM05iLkImeBxrQmZCi0SEQoGAsIVut76rcraERENeOJXJlTNL5dbSKiP_bnKzkHP7LuMqCEZZZXC5M3D2rQRfyKXxGrJM5WBLLylmPKqe4bxCr7boJg0H6f4MwbJuQdYtyE0LFXxx-Nge_c28AsgW-DAZrP-xkr3BlG5NfwByHpK5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2078579988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth‐year Emergency Medicine Clerkships</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hall, Matthew M. ; Dubosh, Nicole M. ; Ullman, Edward ; DeIorio, Nicole M.</creator><contributor>DeIorio, Nicole M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hall, Matthew M. ; Dubosh, Nicole M. ; Ullman, Edward ; DeIorio, Nicole M. ; DeIorio, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Medical student grades during emergency medicine (EM) rotations are a key factor in resident selection. The variability in grading among EM clerkships is not well understood. Objective The objective was to describe the current grade distribution of fourth‐year EM clerkships. Methods This was an observational study at an EM residency program. We identified grade distributions by reviewing the standard letter of evaluation from individuals applying to our residency program for the 2016 match. Descriptive statistics of proportions, standard deviations (SDs), and p‐values were calculated. Results A total of 1,075 applications from 236 individual clerkships were reviewed. Thirty‐four programs did not give an honors grade during the previous year. Four of these programs distributed a highest grade of “high pass” and 30 gave only “pass” and/or “fail.” Of the remaining 202 programs, the percentage of grades that were given as honors ranged from 1% to 87% with a mean (±SD) of 25% (±17.2%). Of the 202 programs that granted honors grades, 63 (31.2%) sites gave between 1 and 14.9% honors grades, 69 (34.2%) gave 15% to 29.9% honors grades, 27 (13.4%) gave 30% to 44.9% honors grades, and 24 (11.9%) programs granted honors to greater than 45% of their students. Medical schools required an EM rotation at 82 (40.6%) sites. Among these programs, honors grades were given to 24% (±16.7%) of students with a range of 4% to 85% while programs that did not require clerkships gave a mean (±SD) of 26% (±17.5%) with a range of 1% to 87% and a p‐value of 0.54. Conclusions Honor grade distribution varies markedly across U.S. fourth‐year EM clerkship sites. Requiring EM clerkships does not affect honor percentages. A minority of sites only give pass/fail grades. Program directors should consider this marked variation in grades when reviewing EM residency applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30051015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Original Contribution ; Original Contributions</subject><ispartof>AEM education and training, 2017-04, Vol.1 (2), p.81-86</ispartof><rights>2017 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-2882e779ecc530cb7a2d0a14717997fed73c8781689379866c11b9c9d939ae9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-2882e779ecc530cb7a2d0a14717997fed73c8781689379866c11b9c9d939ae9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001727/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001727/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051015$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>DeIorio, Nicole M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hall, Matthew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubosh, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullman, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeIorio, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth‐year Emergency Medicine Clerkships</title><title>AEM education and training</title><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><description>Background Medical student grades during emergency medicine (EM) rotations are a key factor in resident selection. The variability in grading among EM clerkships is not well understood. Objective The objective was to describe the current grade distribution of fourth‐year EM clerkships. Methods This was an observational study at an EM residency program. We identified grade distributions by reviewing the standard letter of evaluation from individuals applying to our residency program for the 2016 match. Descriptive statistics of proportions, standard deviations (SDs), and p‐values were calculated. Results A total of 1,075 applications from 236 individual clerkships were reviewed. Thirty‐four programs did not give an honors grade during the previous year. Four of these programs distributed a highest grade of “high pass” and 30 gave only “pass” and/or “fail.” Of the remaining 202 programs, the percentage of grades that were given as honors ranged from 1% to 87% with a mean (±SD) of 25% (±17.2%). Of the 202 programs that granted honors grades, 63 (31.2%) sites gave between 1 and 14.9% honors grades, 69 (34.2%) gave 15% to 29.9% honors grades, 27 (13.4%) gave 30% to 44.9% honors grades, and 24 (11.9%) programs granted honors to greater than 45% of their students. Medical schools required an EM rotation at 82 (40.6%) sites. Among these programs, honors grades were given to 24% (±16.7%) of students with a range of 4% to 85% while programs that did not require clerkships gave a mean (±SD) of 26% (±17.5%) with a range of 1% to 87% and a p‐value of 0.54. Conclusions Honor grade distribution varies markedly across U.S. fourth‐year EM clerkship sites. Requiring EM clerkships does not affect honor percentages. A minority of sites only give pass/fail grades. Program directors should consider this marked variation in grades when reviewing EM residency applications.</description><subject>Original Contribution</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><issn>2472-5390</issn><issn>2472-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1OAjEUhRujEYJsfAAzS2OCth1m2m5MCPJjgtEFrpvSuQPVYYrtjIadj-Az-iTOABLcuLonuV_OvTkHoXOCrwnG9EZBQWtF-BFq0i6jnSgU-PhAN1Db-xdcI92IYHqKGiHGlSJREz3dGV84MysLY_PApsHY5tb5YORUAj7oaWe9D4a2dMXi-_NrDcoFgyW4OeR6HTxAYrTJIehn4F79wqz8GTpJVeahvZst9DwcTPvjzuRxdN_vTTq6SzHvUM4pMCZA6yjEesYUTbAiXUaYECyFhIWaM05iLkImeBxrQmZCi0SEQoGAsIVut76rcraERENeOJXJlTNL5dbSKiP_bnKzkHP7LuMqCEZZZXC5M3D2rQRfyKXxGrJM5WBLLylmPKqe4bxCr7boJg0H6f4MwbJuQdYtyE0LFXxx-Nge_c28AsgW-DAZrP-xkr3BlG5NfwByHpK5</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Hall, Matthew M.</creator><creator>Dubosh, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Ullman, Edward</creator><creator>DeIorio, Nicole M.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth‐year Emergency Medicine Clerkships</title><author>Hall, Matthew M. ; Dubosh, Nicole M. ; Ullman, Edward ; DeIorio, Nicole M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-2882e779ecc530cb7a2d0a14717997fed73c8781689379866c11b9c9d939ae9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Original Contribution</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, Matthew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubosh, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ullman, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeIorio, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, Matthew M.</au><au>Dubosh, Nicole M.</au><au>Ullman, Edward</au><au>DeIorio, Nicole M.</au><au>DeIorio, Nicole M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth‐year Emergency Medicine Clerkships</atitle><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>81-86</pages><issn>2472-5390</issn><eissn>2472-5390</eissn><abstract>Background Medical student grades during emergency medicine (EM) rotations are a key factor in resident selection. The variability in grading among EM clerkships is not well understood. Objective The objective was to describe the current grade distribution of fourth‐year EM clerkships. Methods This was an observational study at an EM residency program. We identified grade distributions by reviewing the standard letter of evaluation from individuals applying to our residency program for the 2016 match. Descriptive statistics of proportions, standard deviations (SDs), and p‐values were calculated. Results A total of 1,075 applications from 236 individual clerkships were reviewed. Thirty‐four programs did not give an honors grade during the previous year. Four of these programs distributed a highest grade of “high pass” and 30 gave only “pass” and/or “fail.” Of the remaining 202 programs, the percentage of grades that were given as honors ranged from 1% to 87% with a mean (±SD) of 25% (±17.2%). Of the 202 programs that granted honors grades, 63 (31.2%) sites gave between 1 and 14.9% honors grades, 69 (34.2%) gave 15% to 29.9% honors grades, 27 (13.4%) gave 30% to 44.9% honors grades, and 24 (11.9%) programs granted honors to greater than 45% of their students. Medical schools required an EM rotation at 82 (40.6%) sites. Among these programs, honors grades were given to 24% (±16.7%) of students with a range of 4% to 85% while programs that did not require clerkships gave a mean (±SD) of 26% (±17.5%) with a range of 1% to 87% and a p‐value of 0.54. Conclusions Honor grade distribution varies markedly across U.S. fourth‐year EM clerkship sites. Requiring EM clerkships does not affect honor percentages. A minority of sites only give pass/fail grades. Program directors should consider this marked variation in grades when reviewing EM residency applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>30051015</pmid><doi>10.1002/aet2.10018</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2472-5390
ispartof AEM education and training, 2017-04, Vol.1 (2), p.81-86
issn 2472-5390
2472-5390
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6001727
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Original Contribution
Original Contributions
title Distribution of Honors Grades Across Fourth‐year Emergency Medicine Clerkships
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A17%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20of%20Honors%20Grades%20Across%20Fourth%E2%80%90year%20Emergency%20Medicine%20Clerkships&rft.jtitle=AEM%20education%20and%20training&rft.au=Hall,%20Matthew%20M.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=81-86&rft.issn=2472-5390&rft.eissn=2472-5390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aet2.10018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2078579988%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-2882e779ecc530cb7a2d0a14717997fed73c8781689379866c11b9c9d939ae9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2078579988&rft_id=info:pmid/30051015&rfr_iscdi=true