Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi

• Published in: Clinical kidney journal 2018-06, Vol.11 (3), p.364-369
• Main Authors: Fankhauser, Christian D, Hermanns, Thomas, Lieger, Laura, Diethelm, Olivia, Umbehr, Martin, Luginbühl, Thomas, Sulser, Tullio, Müntener, Michael, Poyet, Cédric
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Care and treatment; Kidney stones; Lithotripsy; Urolithiasis
• ISSN: 2048-8505; 2048-8513
• DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfx151

ABSTRACT Background The reported success rates for treatments of kidney stones with either extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) are conflicting. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ESWL and URS for previously untreated renal calculi. Methods All patients treated with ESWL or URS at our tertiary care centre between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively identified. Patients with previously untreated kidney stones and a stone diameter of 5-20 mm were included. Stone-free, freedom from reintervention and complication rates were recorded. Independent predictors of stone-free and freedom from reintervention rates were identified by multivariable logistic regression and a propensity score-matched analysis was performed. Results A total of 1282 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 999 (78%) underwent ESWL and 283 (22%) had URS. During post-operative follow-up, only treatment modality and stone size could independently predict stone-free and freedom from reintervention rates. After propensity score matching, ESWL showed significantly lower stone-free rates [ESWL (71%) versus URS (84%)] and fewer patients with freedom from reintervention [ESWL (55%) versus URS (79%)] than URS. Complications were scarce for both treatments and included Clavien Grade 3a in 0.8% versus 0% and Grade 3b in 0.5% versus 0.4% of ESWL and URS treated patients, respectively. Conclusions Treatment success was mainly dependent on stone size and treatment modality. URS might be the better treatment option for previously untreated kidney stones 5-20 mm, with similar morbidity but higher stone-free rates and fewer reinterventions than ESWL.