Loading…
Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
IntroductionPterygium is a non-cancerous growth of the conjunctival tissue over the cornea that may lead to visual impairment in advanced stages, restriction of ocular motility, chronic inflammation and cosmetic concerns. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice, but recurrence of pterygium is a...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ open 2018-06, Vol.8 (6), p.e020714-e020714 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-7645ed6a7a9c68ca37fb85c379446662339aba44e26cacc11db5cf161ac1aa3b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-7645ed6a7a9c68ca37fb85c379446662339aba44e26cacc11db5cf161ac1aa3b3 |
container_end_page | e020714 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e020714 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Lešin, Mladen Paradžik, Martina Marin Lovrić, Josipa Olujić, Ivana Ljubić, Žana Vučinović, Ana Bućan, Kajo Puljak, Livia |
description | IntroductionPterygium is a non-cancerous growth of the conjunctival tissue over the cornea that may lead to visual impairment in advanced stages, restriction of ocular motility, chronic inflammation and cosmetic concerns. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice, but recurrence of pterygium is a frequent problem. It has been previously shown that fibrin glue may result in less recurrence and may take less time than sutures for fixing the conjunctival graft in place during pterygium surgery. However, fibrin glue is a biological material and it carries the risk of transmitting infectious agents from pooled and single-donor blood donors and anaphylaxis in susceptible individuals. Cauterisation is another surgical option, and it would be advantageous to know whether cauterisation may be superior surgical option compared with fibrin glue. This protocol describes the rationale and design of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which we will compare cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery.Methods and analysesThis will be a parallel group RCT comparing cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery. Computer-generated randomisation will be used, and allocation concealment will be conducted using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Surgeons will not be blinded to the procedures, but participants, other investigators and outcome assessors will be blinded. Adult participants with primary pterygium operated in a tertiary hospital in Split, Croatia, will be included. Primary outcome will be recurrence of pterygium, defined as any regrowth of tissue from the area of excision across the limbus onto the cornea after 180 days.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the ethics review board of the University Hospital Split (500-03/17-01/68). Results will be disseminated at conferences and through peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration number NCT03321201; Pre-results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020714 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6020953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2061407952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-7645ed6a7a9c68ca37fb85c379446662339aba44e26cacc11db5cf161ac1aa3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEYhQdRbKn9BYIEvKkXU5PJx2y8EMpQW6GgF_Y6vJPJjFmyyZqPhf4S_65ZdluqV-YmL-Q5Jzk5TfOW4EtCqPg4btZha3zbYdK3uMM9YS-a0w4z1grM-ctn80lzntIa18W45Lx73Zx0UnLMBDttfg9Qsok2QbbBo52JqSQ02zFajxZXDJpDRDr4dfE62x04VAVhiTBn6xdUqW20G4gPaFt9HhZbNiiVuNQZXQxXN9douP_-4RNKuUyViSEHHRwKMwIUwU9hY5OZ9jfkGJyrY44W3Jvm1QwumfPjftbcf7n-Mdy2d99uvg5Xd-3I5Cq3vWDcTAJ6kFqsNNB-Hldc014yJoToKJUwAmOmExq0JmQauZ6JIKAJAB3pWfP54Lst48ZM2tRngFPHTCqAVX-fePtTLWGnRP10yWk1uDgaxPCrmJRVDaSNc-BNKEl1WBCGe8m7ir7_B12HEn2NVykuGeVS4ErRA6VjSCma-ekxBKt99-rYvdp3rw7dV9W75zmeNI9NV-DyAFT1fzn-AYNPvuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2059435960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>British Medical Journals Online Archive (BMJ)</source><creator>Lešin, Mladen ; Paradžik, Martina ; Marin Lovrić, Josipa ; Olujić, Ivana ; Ljubić, Žana ; Vučinović, Ana ; Bućan, Kajo ; Puljak, Livia</creator><creatorcontrib>Lešin, Mladen ; Paradžik, Martina ; Marin Lovrić, Josipa ; Olujić, Ivana ; Ljubić, Žana ; Vučinović, Ana ; Bućan, Kajo ; Puljak, Livia</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionPterygium is a non-cancerous growth of the conjunctival tissue over the cornea that may lead to visual impairment in advanced stages, restriction of ocular motility, chronic inflammation and cosmetic concerns. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice, but recurrence of pterygium is a frequent problem. It has been previously shown that fibrin glue may result in less recurrence and may take less time than sutures for fixing the conjunctival graft in place during pterygium surgery. However, fibrin glue is a biological material and it carries the risk of transmitting infectious agents from pooled and single-donor blood donors and anaphylaxis in susceptible individuals. Cauterisation is another surgical option, and it would be advantageous to know whether cauterisation may be superior surgical option compared with fibrin glue. This protocol describes the rationale and design of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which we will compare cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery.Methods and analysesThis will be a parallel group RCT comparing cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery. Computer-generated randomisation will be used, and allocation concealment will be conducted using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Surgeons will not be blinded to the procedures, but participants, other investigators and outcome assessors will be blinded. Adult participants with primary pterygium operated in a tertiary hospital in Split, Croatia, will be included. Primary outcome will be recurrence of pterygium, defined as any regrowth of tissue from the area of excision across the limbus onto the cornea after 180 days.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the ethics review board of the University Hospital Split (500-03/17-01/68). Results will be disseminated at conferences and through peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration number NCT03321201; Pre-results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020714</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29950464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Cataracts ; Cautery ; Conjunctiva - transplantation ; Cornea ; Croatia ; Evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - chemistry ; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Ophthalmology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Complications ; Pterygium - surgery ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recurrence ; Surgery ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplants & implants ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2018-06, Vol.8 (6), p.e020714-e020714</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-7645ed6a7a9c68ca37fb85c379446662339aba44e26cacc11db5cf161ac1aa3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-7645ed6a7a9c68ca37fb85c379446662339aba44e26cacc11db5cf161ac1aa3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2059435960/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2059435960?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,230,314,727,780,784,885,3194,25753,27549,27550,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126,77594,77595,77601,77632</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29950464$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lešin, Mladen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paradžik, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin Lovrić, Josipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olujić, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljubić, Žana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučinović, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bućan, Kajo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puljak, Livia</creatorcontrib><title>Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>IntroductionPterygium is a non-cancerous growth of the conjunctival tissue over the cornea that may lead to visual impairment in advanced stages, restriction of ocular motility, chronic inflammation and cosmetic concerns. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice, but recurrence of pterygium is a frequent problem. It has been previously shown that fibrin glue may result in less recurrence and may take less time than sutures for fixing the conjunctival graft in place during pterygium surgery. However, fibrin glue is a biological material and it carries the risk of transmitting infectious agents from pooled and single-donor blood donors and anaphylaxis in susceptible individuals. Cauterisation is another surgical option, and it would be advantageous to know whether cauterisation may be superior surgical option compared with fibrin glue. This protocol describes the rationale and design of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which we will compare cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery.Methods and analysesThis will be a parallel group RCT comparing cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery. Computer-generated randomisation will be used, and allocation concealment will be conducted using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Surgeons will not be blinded to the procedures, but participants, other investigators and outcome assessors will be blinded. Adult participants with primary pterygium operated in a tertiary hospital in Split, Croatia, will be included. Primary outcome will be recurrence of pterygium, defined as any regrowth of tissue from the area of excision across the limbus onto the cornea after 180 days.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the ethics review board of the University Hospital Split (500-03/17-01/68). Results will be disseminated at conferences and through peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration number NCT03321201; Pre-results.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Cautery</subject><subject>Conjunctiva - transplantation</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Croatia</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - chemistry</subject><subject>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Pterygium - surgery</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEYhQdRbKn9BYIEvKkXU5PJx2y8EMpQW6GgF_Y6vJPJjFmyyZqPhf4S_65ZdluqV-YmL-Q5Jzk5TfOW4EtCqPg4btZha3zbYdK3uMM9YS-a0w4z1grM-ctn80lzntIa18W45Lx73Zx0UnLMBDttfg9Qsok2QbbBo52JqSQ02zFajxZXDJpDRDr4dfE62x04VAVhiTBn6xdUqW20G4gPaFt9HhZbNiiVuNQZXQxXN9douP_-4RNKuUyViSEHHRwKMwIUwU9hY5OZ9jfkGJyrY44W3Jvm1QwumfPjftbcf7n-Mdy2d99uvg5Xd-3I5Cq3vWDcTAJ6kFqsNNB-Hldc014yJoToKJUwAmOmExq0JmQauZ6JIKAJAB3pWfP54Lst48ZM2tRngFPHTCqAVX-fePtTLWGnRP10yWk1uDgaxPCrmJRVDaSNc-BNKEl1WBCGe8m7ir7_B12HEn2NVykuGeVS4ErRA6VjSCma-ekxBKt99-rYvdp3rw7dV9W75zmeNI9NV-DyAFT1fzn-AYNPvuc</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Lešin, Mladen</creator><creator>Paradžik, Martina</creator><creator>Marin Lovrić, Josipa</creator><creator>Olujić, Ivana</creator><creator>Ljubić, Žana</creator><creator>Vučinović, Ana</creator><creator>Bućan, Kajo</creator><creator>Puljak, Livia</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial</title><author>Lešin, Mladen ; Paradžik, Martina ; Marin Lovrić, Josipa ; Olujić, Ivana ; Ljubić, Žana ; Vučinović, Ana ; Bućan, Kajo ; Puljak, Livia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-7645ed6a7a9c68ca37fb85c379446662339aba44e26cacc11db5cf161ac1aa3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Cautery</topic><topic>Conjunctiva - transplantation</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Croatia</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - chemistry</topic><topic>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Pterygium - surgery</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lešin, Mladen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paradžik, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin Lovrić, Josipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olujić, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljubić, Žana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučinović, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bućan, Kajo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puljak, Livia</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lešin, Mladen</au><au>Paradžik, Martina</au><au>Marin Lovrić, Josipa</au><au>Olujić, Ivana</au><au>Ljubić, Žana</au><au>Vučinović, Ana</au><au>Bućan, Kajo</au><au>Puljak, Livia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e020714</spage><epage>e020714</epage><pages>e020714-e020714</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>IntroductionPterygium is a non-cancerous growth of the conjunctival tissue over the cornea that may lead to visual impairment in advanced stages, restriction of ocular motility, chronic inflammation and cosmetic concerns. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice, but recurrence of pterygium is a frequent problem. It has been previously shown that fibrin glue may result in less recurrence and may take less time than sutures for fixing the conjunctival graft in place during pterygium surgery. However, fibrin glue is a biological material and it carries the risk of transmitting infectious agents from pooled and single-donor blood donors and anaphylaxis in susceptible individuals. Cauterisation is another surgical option, and it would be advantageous to know whether cauterisation may be superior surgical option compared with fibrin glue. This protocol describes the rationale and design of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which we will compare cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery.Methods and analysesThis will be a parallel group RCT comparing cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery. Computer-generated randomisation will be used, and allocation concealment will be conducted using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Surgeons will not be blinded to the procedures, but participants, other investigators and outcome assessors will be blinded. Adult participants with primary pterygium operated in a tertiary hospital in Split, Croatia, will be included. Primary outcome will be recurrence of pterygium, defined as any regrowth of tissue from the area of excision across the limbus onto the cornea after 180 days.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the ethics review board of the University Hospital Split (500-03/17-01/68). Results will be disseminated at conferences and through peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration number NCT03321201; Pre-results.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>29950464</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020714</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2018-06, Vol.8 (6), p.e020714-e020714 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6020953 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database; British Medical Journals Online Archive (BMJ) |
subjects | Adhesives Cataracts Cautery Conjunctiva - transplantation Cornea Croatia Evidence-based medicine Female Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - chemistry Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use Humans Male Methods Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures - methods Ophthalmology Patient Satisfaction Postoperative Complications Pterygium - surgery Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Recurrence Surgery Transplantation, Autologous Transplants & implants Visual Acuity |
title | Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cauterisation%20versus%20fibrin%20glue%20for%20conjunctival%20autografting%20in%20primary%20pterygium%20surgery%20(CAGE%20CUP):%20study%20protocol%20of%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Le%C5%A1in,%20Mladen&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e020714&rft.epage=e020714&rft.pages=e020714-e020714&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020714&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2061407952%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b498t-7645ed6a7a9c68ca37fb85c379446662339aba44e26cacc11db5cf161ac1aa3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2059435960&rft_id=info:pmid/29950464&rfr_iscdi=true |