The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men

• Published in: Royal Society open science 2018-06, Vol.5 (6), p.172286-172286
• Main Authors: Dawson, Samantha J., Chivers, Meredith L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attention; Eye Tracking; Gender Difference; Gender-Specificity; Psychology And Cognitive Neuroscience; Sexual Arousal; Sexual Interest
• ISSN: 2054-5703; 2054-5703
• DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172286

Models of sexual response posit that attentional processing of sexual cues is requisite for sexual responding. Despite hypothesized similarities in the underlying processes resulting in sexual response, gender differences in sexual arousal patterns are abundant. One such gender difference relates to the stimulus features (e.g. gender cues, sexual activity cues) that elicit a response in men and women. In this study, we examined how stimulus modality (static visual images versus dynamic audiovisual films) and stimulus features (gender, sexual activity and nonsexual contextual cues) influences attentional (i.e. gaze) and elaborative (i.e. self-reported attraction (SRA), self-reported arousal) processing of sexual stimuli. Men's initial and controlled attention was consistently gender-specific (i.e. greater attention towards female targets), and this was not influenced by stimulus modality or the presence of sexual activity cues. By contrast, gender-specificity of women's attention patterns differed as a function of attentional stage, stimulus modality and the features within the stimulus. Degree of specificity was positively predictive of SRA in both genders; however, it was not significantly predictive of self-reported arousal. These findings are discussed in the context of gendered processing of visual sexual information, including a discussion of implications for research designs.