Shopping on the Public and Private Health Insurance Marketplaces: Consumer Decision Aids and Plan Presentation

• Published in: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2018-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1400-1410
• Main Authors: Wong, Charlene A., Kulhari, Sajal, McGeoch, Ellen J., Jones, Arthur T., Weiner, Janet, Polsky, Daniel, Baker, Tom
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aids; Cost estimates; Estimates; Estimators; Flags; Health care; Health insurance; Health insurance exchanges; Health Policy; Insurance; Internal Medicine; Internet; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Personal information; Public health; Shopping
• ISSN: 0884-8734; 1525-1497
• DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4483-x

Background The design of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) health insurance marketplaces influences complex health plan choices. Objective To compare the choice environments of the public health insurance exchanges in the fourth (OEP4) versus third (OEP3) open enrollment period and to examine online marketplace run by private companies, including a total cost estimate comparison. Design In November–December 2016, we examined the public and private online health insurance exchanges. We navigated each site for “real-shopping” (personal information required) and “window-shopping” (no required personal information). Participants Public ( n  = 13; 12 state-based marketplaces and HealthCare.gov ) and private ( n  = 23) online health insurance exchanges. Main Measures Features included consumer decision aids (e.g., total cost estimators, provider lookups) and plan display (e.g., order of plans). We examined private health insurance exchanges for notable features (i.e., those not found on public exchanges) and compared the total cost estimates on public versus private exchanges for a standardized consumer. Results Nearly all studied consumer decision aids saw increased deployment in the public marketplaces in OEP4 compared to OEP3. Over half of the public exchanges ( n  = 7 of 13) had total cost estimators (versus 5 of 14 in OEP3) in window-shopping and integrated provider lookups (window-shopping: 7; real-shopping: 8). The most common default plan orders were by premium or total cost estimate. Notable features on private health insurance exchanges were unique data presentation (e.g., infographics) and further personalized shopping (e.g., recommended plan flags). Health plan total cost estimates varied substantially between the public and private exchanges (average difference $1526). Conclusions The ACA’s public health insurance exchanges offered more tools in OEP4 to help consumers select a plan. While private health insurance exchanges presented notable features, the total cost estimates for a standardized consumer varied widely on public versus private exchanges.