Periodontal profile classes predict periodontal disease progression and tooth loss

• Published in: Journal of periodontology (1970) 2018-02, Vol.89 (2), p.148-156
• Main Authors: Morelli, Thiago, Moss, Kevin L., Preisser, John S., Beck, James D., Divaris, Kimon, Wu, Di, Offenbacher, Steven
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dentistry; Diagnosis; epidemiology; oral medicine; periodontal medicine; periodontitis; prognosis
• ISSN: 0022-3492; 1943-3670
• DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0427

Background Current periodontal disease taxonomies have limited utility for predicting disease progression and tooth loss; in fact, tooth loss itself can undermine precise person‐level periodontal disease classifications. To overcome this limitation, the current group recently introduced a novel patient stratification system using latent class analyses of clinical parameters, including patterns of missing teeth. This investigation sought to determine the clinical utility of the Periodontal Profile Classes and Tooth Profile Classes (PPC/TPC) taxonomy for risk assessment, specifically for predicting periodontal disease progression and incident tooth loss. Methods The analytic sample comprised 4,682 adult participants of two prospective cohort studies (Dental Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study and Piedmont Dental Study) with information on periodontal disease progression and incident tooth loss. The PPC/TPC taxonomy includes seven distinct PPCs (person‐level disease pattern and severity) and seven TPCs (tooth‐level disease). Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of these latent classes with disease progression and incident tooth loss, adjusting for examination center, race, sex, age, diabetes, and smoking. To obtain personalized outcome propensities, risk estimates associated with each participant's PPC and TPC were combined into person‐level composite risk scores (Index of Periodontal Risk [IPR]). Results Individuals in two PPCs (PPC‐G: Severe Disease and PPC‐D: Tooth Loss) had the highest tooth loss risk (RR = 3.6; 95% CI = 2.6 to 5.0 and RR = 3.8; 95% CI = 2.9 to 5.1, respectively). PPC‐G also had the highest risk for periodontitis progression (RR = 5.7; 95% CI = 2.2 to 14.7). Personalized IPR scores were positively associated with both periodontitis progression and tooth loss. Conclusions These findings, upon additional validation, suggest that the periodontal/tooth profile classes and the derived personalized propensity scores provide clinical periodontal definitions that reflect disease patterns in the population and offer a useful system for patient stratification that is predictive for disease progression and tooth loss.