Loading…

Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs

Abstract Reliance on anthelmintic drugs to control internal parasites in sheep is no longer sustainable because of the development of resistance to these drugs in parasite populations. Genetic selection may offer an alternative long-term solution, as differences in parasite resistance exist both wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2018-05, Vol.96 (5), p.1590-1599
Main Authors: Ngere, L, Burke, J M, Morgan, J L M, Miller, J E, Notter, D R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a36cdaee11569775e12534b0aade512a2d93abb1383395e705c4d58197b9ea693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a36cdaee11569775e12534b0aade512a2d93abb1383395e705c4d58197b9ea693
container_end_page 1599
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1590
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 96
creator Ngere, L
Burke, J M
Morgan, J L M
Miller, J E
Notter, D R
description Abstract Reliance on anthelmintic drugs to control internal parasites in sheep is no longer sustainable because of the development of resistance to these drugs in parasite populations. Genetic selection may offer an alternative long-term solution, as differences in parasite resistance exist both within and among sheep breeds. However, selection for parasite resistance may have correlated effects on other production traits. The objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters for weaning (WFEC) and postweaning (PWFEC) fecal egg counts (FEC) and assess their relationship with birth (BWT), weaning (WWT), and postweaning (PWWT) BW in Katahdin lambs. The study used WFEC (n = 2,537), PWFEC (n = 3.421), BWT (n = 12,869), WWT (n = 10,961), and PWWT (n = 7,812) from 12,869 lambs measured between 2003 and 2015 in 13 flocks enrolled in the U.S. National Sheep Improvement Program. Animal and sire models were fitted to the data using the ASReml statistical package. Records were corrected for fixed effects of dam age, joint effect of type of birth and rearing, and management group (defined by joint effects of flock, sex, and birth year and season); lamb age in days at each measurement time was fitted as a covariate. Maternal additive and maternal permanent environmental effects were not significant (P > 0.05), but litter effects influenced (P < 0.01) both WFEC and PWFEC. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.18 to 0.26 for WFEC and 0.23 to 0.46 for PWFEC, depending on the model used. Heritability estimates from sire models were higher than estimates from animal models. Direct additive, litter, residual, and phenotypic correlations between WFEC and PWFEC were 0.82, 0.25, 0.15, and 0.29, respectively. Bivariate analyses revealed low to moderate correlations between BW and FEC. Moderate heritabilities for FEC in this study indicated that genetic progress for this trait can be achieved in Katahdin lambs and that selection for low FEC should have little or no effect on BW.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/sky064
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6140914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/sky064</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2024019028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a36cdaee11569775e12534b0aade512a2d93abb1383395e705c4d58197b9ea693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U9rFDEYBvAgFrtWL34ACYggwtj8n8lFkKK1WPCi5_DOzLs7WWcmY5Kx7LdvZGvRHjwlkB8PT3gIecHZO86sPN9DOk8_DsyoR2TDtdCV5EY-JhvGBK-ahotT8jSlPWNcaKufkFNhjdRGyg1pL3HG7Du6QIQJM8ZEtyHSLXYwUtztaBfWOScKc0_zgD7SiCNkH-Y0-IXe-DzQNvQHeoN-NxToZ_oFMgx9uYwwtekZOdnCmPD53XlGvn_6-O3ic3X99fLq4sN11SlpcgXSdD0gcq6NrWuNpaxULQPoUXMBorcS2pbLRkqrsWa6U71uuK1bi2CsPCPvj7nL2k7YdzjnCKNbop8gHlwA7_59mf3gduGXM1wxy1UJeHMXEMPPFVN2k08djiPMGNbkBBOKcctEU-irB3Qf1jiX7xWleG2MVHVRb4-qiyGliNv7Mpy539O5Mp07Tlfwy7_r39M_WxXw-gjCuvwv6Ba2IaM_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2041766347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs</title><source>PubMed</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Ngere, L ; Burke, J M ; Morgan, J L M ; Miller, J E ; Notter, D R</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngere, L ; Burke, J M ; Morgan, J L M ; Miller, J E ; Notter, D R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Reliance on anthelmintic drugs to control internal parasites in sheep is no longer sustainable because of the development of resistance to these drugs in parasite populations. Genetic selection may offer an alternative long-term solution, as differences in parasite resistance exist both within and among sheep breeds. However, selection for parasite resistance may have correlated effects on other production traits. The objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters for weaning (WFEC) and postweaning (PWFEC) fecal egg counts (FEC) and assess their relationship with birth (BWT), weaning (WWT), and postweaning (PWWT) BW in Katahdin lambs. The study used WFEC (n = 2,537), PWFEC (n = 3.421), BWT (n = 12,869), WWT (n = 10,961), and PWWT (n = 7,812) from 12,869 lambs measured between 2003 and 2015 in 13 flocks enrolled in the U.S. National Sheep Improvement Program. Animal and sire models were fitted to the data using the ASReml statistical package. Records were corrected for fixed effects of dam age, joint effect of type of birth and rearing, and management group (defined by joint effects of flock, sex, and birth year and season); lamb age in days at each measurement time was fitted as a covariate. Maternal additive and maternal permanent environmental effects were not significant (P &gt; 0.05), but litter effects influenced (P &lt; 0.01) both WFEC and PWFEC. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.18 to 0.26 for WFEC and 0.23 to 0.46 for PWFEC, depending on the model used. Heritability estimates from sire models were higher than estimates from animal models. Direct additive, litter, residual, and phenotypic correlations between WFEC and PWFEC were 0.82, 0.25, 0.15, and 0.29, respectively. Bivariate analyses revealed low to moderate correlations between BW and FEC. Moderate heritabilities for FEC in this study indicated that genetic progress for this trait can be achieved in Katahdin lambs and that selection for low FEC should have little or no effect on BW.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29635633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal models ; Animals ; Anthelmintic agents ; Anthelmintics - therapeutic use ; Birth ; Bivariate analysis ; Body Weight - genetics ; Breeding ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Climate ; Correlation analysis ; Drug development ; Drug resistance ; Drugs ; Environmental effects ; Estimates ; Feces ; Feces - parasitology ; Female ; Genetics ; Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology ; Helminths - isolation &amp; purification ; Heritability ; Litter ; Litter size ; Male ; Ovis aries ; Parameter estimation ; Parasite Egg Count - veterinary ; Parasite resistance ; Parasites ; Phenotype ; Population genetics ; Seasons ; Sheep ; Sheep Diseases - parasitology ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainable development ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-05, Vol.96 (5), p.1590-1599</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a36cdaee11569775e12534b0aade512a2d93abb1383395e705c4d58197b9ea693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a36cdaee11569775e12534b0aade512a2d93abb1383395e705c4d58197b9ea693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140914/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140914/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29635633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngere, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, J L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notter, D R</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract Reliance on anthelmintic drugs to control internal parasites in sheep is no longer sustainable because of the development of resistance to these drugs in parasite populations. Genetic selection may offer an alternative long-term solution, as differences in parasite resistance exist both within and among sheep breeds. However, selection for parasite resistance may have correlated effects on other production traits. The objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters for weaning (WFEC) and postweaning (PWFEC) fecal egg counts (FEC) and assess their relationship with birth (BWT), weaning (WWT), and postweaning (PWWT) BW in Katahdin lambs. The study used WFEC (n = 2,537), PWFEC (n = 3.421), BWT (n = 12,869), WWT (n = 10,961), and PWWT (n = 7,812) from 12,869 lambs measured between 2003 and 2015 in 13 flocks enrolled in the U.S. National Sheep Improvement Program. Animal and sire models were fitted to the data using the ASReml statistical package. Records were corrected for fixed effects of dam age, joint effect of type of birth and rearing, and management group (defined by joint effects of flock, sex, and birth year and season); lamb age in days at each measurement time was fitted as a covariate. Maternal additive and maternal permanent environmental effects were not significant (P &gt; 0.05), but litter effects influenced (P &lt; 0.01) both WFEC and PWFEC. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.18 to 0.26 for WFEC and 0.23 to 0.46 for PWFEC, depending on the model used. Heritability estimates from sire models were higher than estimates from animal models. Direct additive, litter, residual, and phenotypic correlations between WFEC and PWFEC were 0.82, 0.25, 0.15, and 0.29, respectively. Bivariate analyses revealed low to moderate correlations between BW and FEC. Moderate heritabilities for FEC in this study indicated that genetic progress for this trait can be achieved in Katahdin lambs and that selection for low FEC should have little or no effect on BW.</description><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthelmintic agents</subject><subject>Anthelmintics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Body Weight - genetics</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology</subject><subject>Helminths - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Heritability</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Litter size</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Ovis aries</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Parasite Egg Count - veterinary</subject><subject>Parasite resistance</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U9rFDEYBvAgFrtWL34ACYggwtj8n8lFkKK1WPCi5_DOzLs7WWcmY5Kx7LdvZGvRHjwlkB8PT3gIecHZO86sPN9DOk8_DsyoR2TDtdCV5EY-JhvGBK-ahotT8jSlPWNcaKufkFNhjdRGyg1pL3HG7Du6QIQJM8ZEtyHSLXYwUtztaBfWOScKc0_zgD7SiCNkH-Y0-IXe-DzQNvQHeoN-NxToZ_oFMgx9uYwwtekZOdnCmPD53XlGvn_6-O3ic3X99fLq4sN11SlpcgXSdD0gcq6NrWuNpaxULQPoUXMBorcS2pbLRkqrsWa6U71uuK1bi2CsPCPvj7nL2k7YdzjnCKNbop8gHlwA7_59mf3gduGXM1wxy1UJeHMXEMPPFVN2k08djiPMGNbkBBOKcctEU-irB3Qf1jiX7xWleG2MVHVRb4-qiyGliNv7Mpy539O5Mp07Tlfwy7_r39M_WxXw-gjCuvwv6Ba2IaM_</recordid><startdate>20180504</startdate><enddate>20180504</enddate><creator>Ngere, L</creator><creator>Burke, J M</creator><creator>Morgan, J L M</creator><creator>Miller, J E</creator><creator>Notter, D R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180504</creationdate><title>Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs</title><author>Ngere, L ; Burke, J M ; Morgan, J L M ; Miller, J E ; Notter, D R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a36cdaee11569775e12534b0aade512a2d93abb1383395e705c4d58197b9ea693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthelmintic agents</topic><topic>Anthelmintics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Body Weight - genetics</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology</topic><topic>Helminths - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Heritability</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Litter size</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Ovis aries</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Parasite Egg Count - veterinary</topic><topic>Parasite resistance</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngere, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, J L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notter, D R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngere, L</au><au>Burke, J M</au><au>Morgan, J L M</au><au>Miller, J E</au><au>Notter, D R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2018-05-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1590</spage><epage>1599</epage><pages>1590-1599</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract Reliance on anthelmintic drugs to control internal parasites in sheep is no longer sustainable because of the development of resistance to these drugs in parasite populations. Genetic selection may offer an alternative long-term solution, as differences in parasite resistance exist both within and among sheep breeds. However, selection for parasite resistance may have correlated effects on other production traits. The objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters for weaning (WFEC) and postweaning (PWFEC) fecal egg counts (FEC) and assess their relationship with birth (BWT), weaning (WWT), and postweaning (PWWT) BW in Katahdin lambs. The study used WFEC (n = 2,537), PWFEC (n = 3.421), BWT (n = 12,869), WWT (n = 10,961), and PWWT (n = 7,812) from 12,869 lambs measured between 2003 and 2015 in 13 flocks enrolled in the U.S. National Sheep Improvement Program. Animal and sire models were fitted to the data using the ASReml statistical package. Records were corrected for fixed effects of dam age, joint effect of type of birth and rearing, and management group (defined by joint effects of flock, sex, and birth year and season); lamb age in days at each measurement time was fitted as a covariate. Maternal additive and maternal permanent environmental effects were not significant (P &gt; 0.05), but litter effects influenced (P &lt; 0.01) both WFEC and PWFEC. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.18 to 0.26 for WFEC and 0.23 to 0.46 for PWFEC, depending on the model used. Heritability estimates from sire models were higher than estimates from animal models. Direct additive, litter, residual, and phenotypic correlations between WFEC and PWFEC were 0.82, 0.25, 0.15, and 0.29, respectively. Bivariate analyses revealed low to moderate correlations between BW and FEC. Moderate heritabilities for FEC in this study indicated that genetic progress for this trait can be achieved in Katahdin lambs and that selection for low FEC should have little or no effect on BW.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29635633</pmid><doi>10.1093/jas/sky064</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2018-05, Vol.96 (5), p.1590-1599
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6140914
source PubMed; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animal Genetics and Genomics
Animal models
Animals
Anthelmintic agents
Anthelmintics - therapeutic use
Birth
Bivariate analysis
Body Weight - genetics
Breeding
Childbirth & labor
Climate
Correlation analysis
Drug development
Drug resistance
Drugs
Environmental effects
Estimates
Feces
Feces - parasitology
Female
Genetics
Helminthiasis, Animal - parasitology
Helminths - isolation & purification
Heritability
Litter
Litter size
Male
Ovis aries
Parameter estimation
Parasite Egg Count - veterinary
Parasite resistance
Parasites
Phenotype
Population genetics
Seasons
Sheep
Sheep Diseases - parasitology
Statistical analysis
Sustainable development
Weaning
title Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A31%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20parameters%20for%20fecal%20egg%20counts%20and%20their%20relationship%20with%20body%20weights%20in%20Katahdin%20lambs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Ngere,%20L&rft.date=2018-05-04&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1590&rft.epage=1599&rft.pages=1590-1599&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/sky064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2024019028%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-a36cdaee11569775e12534b0aade512a2d93abb1383395e705c4d58197b9ea693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2041766347&rft_id=info:pmid/29635633&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/sky064&rfr_iscdi=true