Loading…
PROMIS Peer Relationships Short Form: How Well Does Self-Report Correlate With Data From Peers?
To examine the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) peer relationships short form (PR-SF), including association with peer-reported friendships, likeability, and social reputation. 203 children (Mage = 10.12 years, SD = 2.37, range = 6-14)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of pediatric psychology 2018-10, Vol.43 (9), p.1059-1067 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fc0a909fbcebe36e5cb7017db8126bdb0261d3c8945a353edb81bce31d1b739a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fc0a909fbcebe36e5cb7017db8126bdb0261d3c8945a353edb81bce31d1b739a3 |
container_end_page | 1067 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1059 |
container_title | Journal of pediatric psychology |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Devine, Katie A Willard, Victoria W Hocking, Matthew C Stapleton, Jerod L Rotter, David Bukowski, William M Noll, Robert B |
description | To examine the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) peer relationships short form (PR-SF), including association with peer-reported friendships, likeability, and social reputation.
203 children (Mage = 10.12 years, SD = 2.37, range = 6-14) in Grades 1-8 completed the 8-item PR-SF and friendship nominations, like ratings, and social reputation measures about their peers during 2 classroom visits approximately 4 months apart, as part of a larger study. A confirmatory factor analysis, followed by an exploratory factor analysis, was conducted to examine the factor structure of the PR-SF. Spearman correlations between the PR-SF and peer-reported outcomes evaluated construct validity.
For the PR-SF, a 2-factor solution demonstrated better fit than a 1-factor solution. The 2 factors appear to assess friendship quality (3 items) and peer acceptance (5 items). Reliability was marginal for the friendship quality factor (.66) but adequate for the acceptance factor (.85); stability was .34 for the PR-SF over 4 months. The PR-SF (8 items) and acceptance factor (5 items) both had modest but significant correlations with measures of friendship (rs = .25-.27), likeability (rs = .21-.22), and social reputation (rs = .29-.44).
The PR-SF appears to be measuring two distinct aspects of social functioning. The 5-item peer acceptance scale is modestly associated with peer-reported friendship, likeability, and social reputation. Although not a replacement for peer-reported outcomes, the PR-SF is a promising patient-reported outcome for peer relationships in youth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy038 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6147751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2045301987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fc0a909fbcebe36e5cb7017db8126bdb0261d3c8945a353edb81bce31d1b739a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1PwkAQxTdGI4gevZo9eqnMsv30oDEgQoKBgAZvm207tSUtW3eLhv_eYpHoaTJ5v3kzk0fIJYMbBgHvrkoszba7Mlvg_hFpM9t1LI87b8ekDXVj-W7AW-TMmBUA2DZ3T0mrF_gAHNw2EbP59Hm8oDNETeeYyypTa5NmpaGLVOmKDpUubulIfdEl5jkdKKwVzBNrjuVO7yutd2NIl1mV0oGsJB1qVfw4mvtzcpLI3ODFvnbI6_DxpT-yJtOncf9hYkXc9yoriUAGECRhhCFyF50o9IB5ceiznhvGIfRcFvPID2xHcofjTqhZzmIWejyQvEPuGt9yExYYR7iutMxFqbNC6q1QMhP_lXWWinf1KVxme57DaoPrvYFWHxs0lSgyE9UvyzWqjRE9sB0OLPC9GrUaNNLKGI3JYQ0DsQtFNKGIJpSav_p724H-TYF_A2ori8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2045301987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROMIS Peer Relationships Short Form: How Well Does Self-Report Correlate With Data From Peers?</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Devine, Katie A ; Willard, Victoria W ; Hocking, Matthew C ; Stapleton, Jerod L ; Rotter, David ; Bukowski, William M ; Noll, Robert B</creator><creatorcontrib>Devine, Katie A ; Willard, Victoria W ; Hocking, Matthew C ; Stapleton, Jerod L ; Rotter, David ; Bukowski, William M ; Noll, Robert B</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) peer relationships short form (PR-SF), including association with peer-reported friendships, likeability, and social reputation.
203 children (Mage = 10.12 years, SD = 2.37, range = 6-14) in Grades 1-8 completed the 8-item PR-SF and friendship nominations, like ratings, and social reputation measures about their peers during 2 classroom visits approximately 4 months apart, as part of a larger study. A confirmatory factor analysis, followed by an exploratory factor analysis, was conducted to examine the factor structure of the PR-SF. Spearman correlations between the PR-SF and peer-reported outcomes evaluated construct validity.
For the PR-SF, a 2-factor solution demonstrated better fit than a 1-factor solution. The 2 factors appear to assess friendship quality (3 items) and peer acceptance (5 items). Reliability was marginal for the friendship quality factor (.66) but adequate for the acceptance factor (.85); stability was .34 for the PR-SF over 4 months. The PR-SF (8 items) and acceptance factor (5 items) both had modest but significant correlations with measures of friendship (rs = .25-.27), likeability (rs = .21-.22), and social reputation (rs = .29-.44).
The PR-SF appears to be measuring two distinct aspects of social functioning. The 5-item peer acceptance scale is modestly associated with peer-reported friendship, likeability, and social reputation. Although not a replacement for peer-reported outcomes, the PR-SF is a promising patient-reported outcome for peer relationships in youth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-8693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-735X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29800306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Regular</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric psychology, 2018-10, Vol.43 (9), p.1059-1067</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fc0a909fbcebe36e5cb7017db8126bdb0261d3c8945a353edb81bce31d1b739a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fc0a909fbcebe36e5cb7017db8126bdb0261d3c8945a353edb81bce31d1b739a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3340-1460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29800306$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devine, Katie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willard, Victoria W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocking, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stapleton, Jerod L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotter, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukowski, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Robert B</creatorcontrib><title>PROMIS Peer Relationships Short Form: How Well Does Self-Report Correlate With Data From Peers?</title><title>Journal of pediatric psychology</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Psychol</addtitle><description>To examine the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) peer relationships short form (PR-SF), including association with peer-reported friendships, likeability, and social reputation.
203 children (Mage = 10.12 years, SD = 2.37, range = 6-14) in Grades 1-8 completed the 8-item PR-SF and friendship nominations, like ratings, and social reputation measures about their peers during 2 classroom visits approximately 4 months apart, as part of a larger study. A confirmatory factor analysis, followed by an exploratory factor analysis, was conducted to examine the factor structure of the PR-SF. Spearman correlations between the PR-SF and peer-reported outcomes evaluated construct validity.
For the PR-SF, a 2-factor solution demonstrated better fit than a 1-factor solution. The 2 factors appear to assess friendship quality (3 items) and peer acceptance (5 items). Reliability was marginal for the friendship quality factor (.66) but adequate for the acceptance factor (.85); stability was .34 for the PR-SF over 4 months. The PR-SF (8 items) and acceptance factor (5 items) both had modest but significant correlations with measures of friendship (rs = .25-.27), likeability (rs = .21-.22), and social reputation (rs = .29-.44).
The PR-SF appears to be measuring two distinct aspects of social functioning. The 5-item peer acceptance scale is modestly associated with peer-reported friendship, likeability, and social reputation. Although not a replacement for peer-reported outcomes, the PR-SF is a promising patient-reported outcome for peer relationships in youth.</description><subject>Regular</subject><issn>0146-8693</issn><issn>1465-735X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1PwkAQxTdGI4gevZo9eqnMsv30oDEgQoKBgAZvm207tSUtW3eLhv_eYpHoaTJ5v3kzk0fIJYMbBgHvrkoszba7Mlvg_hFpM9t1LI87b8ekDXVj-W7AW-TMmBUA2DZ3T0mrF_gAHNw2EbP59Hm8oDNETeeYyypTa5NmpaGLVOmKDpUubulIfdEl5jkdKKwVzBNrjuVO7yutd2NIl1mV0oGsJB1qVfw4mvtzcpLI3ODFvnbI6_DxpT-yJtOncf9hYkXc9yoriUAGECRhhCFyF50o9IB5ceiznhvGIfRcFvPID2xHcofjTqhZzmIWejyQvEPuGt9yExYYR7iutMxFqbNC6q1QMhP_lXWWinf1KVxme57DaoPrvYFWHxs0lSgyE9UvyzWqjRE9sB0OLPC9GrUaNNLKGI3JYQ0DsQtFNKGIJpSav_p724H-TYF_A2ori8s</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Devine, Katie A</creator><creator>Willard, Victoria W</creator><creator>Hocking, Matthew C</creator><creator>Stapleton, Jerod L</creator><creator>Rotter, David</creator><creator>Bukowski, William M</creator><creator>Noll, Robert B</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-1460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>PROMIS Peer Relationships Short Form: How Well Does Self-Report Correlate With Data From Peers?</title><author>Devine, Katie A ; Willard, Victoria W ; Hocking, Matthew C ; Stapleton, Jerod L ; Rotter, David ; Bukowski, William M ; Noll, Robert B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fc0a909fbcebe36e5cb7017db8126bdb0261d3c8945a353edb81bce31d1b739a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Regular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devine, Katie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willard, Victoria W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocking, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stapleton, Jerod L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotter, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukowski, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Robert B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devine, Katie A</au><au>Willard, Victoria W</au><au>Hocking, Matthew C</au><au>Stapleton, Jerod L</au><au>Rotter, David</au><au>Bukowski, William M</au><au>Noll, Robert B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROMIS Peer Relationships Short Form: How Well Does Self-Report Correlate With Data From Peers?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1059</spage><epage>1067</epage><pages>1059-1067</pages><issn>0146-8693</issn><eissn>1465-735X</eissn><abstract>To examine the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) peer relationships short form (PR-SF), including association with peer-reported friendships, likeability, and social reputation.
203 children (Mage = 10.12 years, SD = 2.37, range = 6-14) in Grades 1-8 completed the 8-item PR-SF and friendship nominations, like ratings, and social reputation measures about their peers during 2 classroom visits approximately 4 months apart, as part of a larger study. A confirmatory factor analysis, followed by an exploratory factor analysis, was conducted to examine the factor structure of the PR-SF. Spearman correlations between the PR-SF and peer-reported outcomes evaluated construct validity.
For the PR-SF, a 2-factor solution demonstrated better fit than a 1-factor solution. The 2 factors appear to assess friendship quality (3 items) and peer acceptance (5 items). Reliability was marginal for the friendship quality factor (.66) but adequate for the acceptance factor (.85); stability was .34 for the PR-SF over 4 months. The PR-SF (8 items) and acceptance factor (5 items) both had modest but significant correlations with measures of friendship (rs = .25-.27), likeability (rs = .21-.22), and social reputation (rs = .29-.44).
The PR-SF appears to be measuring two distinct aspects of social functioning. The 5-item peer acceptance scale is modestly associated with peer-reported friendship, likeability, and social reputation. Although not a replacement for peer-reported outcomes, the PR-SF is a promising patient-reported outcome for peer relationships in youth.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29800306</pmid><doi>10.1093/jpepsy/jsy038</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-1460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-8693 |
ispartof | Journal of pediatric psychology, 2018-10, Vol.43 (9), p.1059-1067 |
issn | 0146-8693 1465-735X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6147751 |
source | Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list) |
subjects | Regular |
title | PROMIS Peer Relationships Short Form: How Well Does Self-Report Correlate With Data From Peers? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A14%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROMIS%20Peer%20Relationships%20Short%20Form:%20How%20Well%20Does%20Self-Report%20Correlate%20With%20Data%20From%20Peers?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20psychology&rft.au=Devine,%20Katie%20A&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1059&rft.epage=1067&rft.pages=1059-1067&rft.issn=0146-8693&rft.eissn=1465-735X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jpepsy/jsy038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2045301987%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fc0a909fbcebe36e5cb7017db8126bdb0261d3c8945a353edb81bce31d1b739a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2045301987&rft_id=info:pmid/29800306&rfr_iscdi=true |