Political priorities and public health services in English local authorities: the case of tobacco control and smoking cessation services

• Published in: Journal of public health (Oxford, England) England), 2018-09, Vol.40 (3), p.e269-e274
• Main Authors: Anderson, W.J., Cheeseman, H., Butterworth, G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original; Wider determinants (online only)
• ISSN: 1741-3842; 1741-3850
• DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx143

Since 2013, local authorities in England have been responsible for public health including smoking cessation services. Online surveys of tobacco control leads in English local authorities were conducted in 2014 (76% response rate, n = 116), 2015 (82% response rate, n = 124) and 2016 (85% response rate, n = 129). A high priority for tobacco control was reported in 17% of local authorities in 2014, rising to 27% in 2016. A low priority for tobacco control was reported in 4% of local authorities in 2014, rising to 11% in 2016. Budgets for smoking cessation services were cut in 16% of local authorities in 2014, 39% in 2015 and 59% in 2016. In 2016, budgets were cut in all local authorities where the priority given to tobacco control was perceived to be low and in 40% of the local authorities where it was perceived to be high. Cuts in smoking cessation budgets were principally due to cuts to the public health grant and wider cuts to local authority budgets. At a time of significant cost pressure, political support for tobacco control in English local authorities mitigates but does not remove the risk of cuts to budgets for smoking cessation services.