Loading…
Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention
Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Missouri medicine 2012-01, Vol.109 (1), p.79-84 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 84 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Missouri medicine |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Lee, John H Chuu, Kenny Spertus, John Cohen, David J James, A Grantham Tang, Fengming O'Keefe, James H |
description | Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown.
We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI.
Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina.
Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6181674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>929501873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-a9c5eeae547df7a163e0ce9551858ebc7a6f718a2820a942b02e720354a491ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8g3TpH8iBPngoQqXlIlOMCJQ7RxN9QojYPtROq_x1ULgtMevtkZzZyQOWOiyIpCsBk5D-GTMVlpKc7ITIhc6FzJOXl_gWixj4G6CT2GaLcQkcYN0sHFBCx0tMEeW7vXtBQ7NNFOCaM3Y4Qe3Riocd714HfU9hH9tP9z_QU5baELeHm8C_J2f_e6fMxWzw9Py9tVNnDNYgaVUYiAKi_XbQm8kMgMVkpxrTQ2poSiLbkGoQWDKhcNE1gKJlUOecUR5YLcHHyHsdni2qR0D109-NTF72oHtv5PerupP9xUF1zzosyTwfXRwLuvMY1Qb20w2HWHdnUlKsW4LmVSXv2N-s34GVR-A9krdM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>929501873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Lee, John H ; Chuu, Kenny ; Spertus, John ; Cohen, David J ; James, A Grantham ; Tang, Fengming ; O'Keefe, James H</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, John H ; Chuu, Kenny ; Spertus, John ; Cohen, David J ; James, A Grantham ; Tang, Fengming ; O'Keefe, James H</creatorcontrib><description>Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown.
We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI.
Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina.
Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-6620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22428453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Patients - psychology ; Science of Medicine</subject><ispartof>Missouri medicine, 2012-01, Vol.109 (1), p.79-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by the Missouri State Medical Association 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181674/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181674/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22428453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuu, Kenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spertus, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A Grantham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fengming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, James H</creatorcontrib><title>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</title><title>Missouri medicine</title><addtitle>Mo Med</addtitle><description>Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown.
We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI.
Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina.
Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Science of Medicine</subject><issn>0026-6620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8g3TpH8iBPngoQqXlIlOMCJQ7RxN9QojYPtROq_x1ULgtMevtkZzZyQOWOiyIpCsBk5D-GTMVlpKc7ITIhc6FzJOXl_gWixj4G6CT2GaLcQkcYN0sHFBCx0tMEeW7vXtBQ7NNFOCaM3Y4Qe3Riocd714HfU9hH9tP9z_QU5baELeHm8C_J2f_e6fMxWzw9Py9tVNnDNYgaVUYiAKi_XbQm8kMgMVkpxrTQ2poSiLbkGoQWDKhcNE1gKJlUOecUR5YLcHHyHsdni2qR0D109-NTF72oHtv5PerupP9xUF1zzosyTwfXRwLuvMY1Qb20w2HWHdnUlKsW4LmVSXv2N-s34GVR-A9krdM4</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Lee, John H</creator><creator>Chuu, Kenny</creator><creator>Spertus, John</creator><creator>Cohen, David J</creator><creator>James, A Grantham</creator><creator>Tang, Fengming</creator><creator>O'Keefe, James H</creator><general>Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</title><author>Lee, John H ; Chuu, Kenny ; Spertus, John ; Cohen, David J ; James, A Grantham ; Tang, Fengming ; O'Keefe, James H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-a9c5eeae547df7a163e0ce9551858ebc7a6f718a2820a942b02e720354a491ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Science of Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuu, Kenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spertus, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A Grantham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fengming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, James H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Missouri medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, John H</au><au>Chuu, Kenny</au><au>Spertus, John</au><au>Cohen, David J</au><au>James, A Grantham</au><au>Tang, Fengming</au><au>O'Keefe, James H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</atitle><jtitle>Missouri medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mo Med</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>79-84</pages><issn>0026-6620</issn><abstract>Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown.
We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI.
Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina.
Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association</pub><pmid>22428453</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-6620 |
ispartof | Missouri medicine, 2012-01, Vol.109 (1), p.79-84 |
issn | 0026-6620 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6181674 |
source | PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Aged Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology Coronary Artery Disease - therapy Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology Female Humans Male Patients - psychology Science of Medicine |
title | Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%20overestimate%20the%20potential%20benefits%20of%20elective%20percutaneous%20coronary%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Missouri%20medicine&rft.au=Lee,%20John%20H&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=79-84&rft.issn=0026-6620&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E929501873%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-a9c5eeae547df7a163e0ce9551858ebc7a6f718a2820a942b02e720354a491ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=929501873&rft_id=info:pmid/22428453&rfr_iscdi=true |