Loading…

Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Missouri medicine 2012-01, Vol.109 (1), p.79-84
Main Authors: Lee, John H, Chuu, Kenny, Spertus, John, Cohen, David J, James, A Grantham, Tang, Fengming, O'Keefe, James H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Missouri medicine
container_volume 109
creator Lee, John H
Chuu, Kenny
Spertus, John
Cohen, David J
James, A Grantham
Tang, Fengming
O'Keefe, James H
description Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown. We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI. Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina. Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6181674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>929501873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-a9c5eeae547df7a163e0ce9551858ebc7a6f718a2820a942b02e720354a491ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8g3TpH8iBPngoQqXlIlOMCJQ7RxN9QojYPtROq_x1ULgtMevtkZzZyQOWOiyIpCsBk5D-GTMVlpKc7ITIhc6FzJOXl_gWixj4G6CT2GaLcQkcYN0sHFBCx0tMEeW7vXtBQ7NNFOCaM3Y4Qe3Riocd714HfU9hH9tP9z_QU5baELeHm8C_J2f_e6fMxWzw9Py9tVNnDNYgaVUYiAKi_XbQm8kMgMVkpxrTQ2poSiLbkGoQWDKhcNE1gKJlUOecUR5YLcHHyHsdni2qR0D109-NTF72oHtv5PerupP9xUF1zzosyTwfXRwLuvMY1Qb20w2HWHdnUlKsW4LmVSXv2N-s34GVR-A9krdM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>929501873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Lee, John H ; Chuu, Kenny ; Spertus, John ; Cohen, David J ; James, A Grantham ; Tang, Fengming ; O'Keefe, James H</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, John H ; Chuu, Kenny ; Spertus, John ; Cohen, David J ; James, A Grantham ; Tang, Fengming ; O'Keefe, James H</creatorcontrib><description>Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown. We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI. Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina. Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-6620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22428453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Patients - psychology ; Science of Medicine</subject><ispartof>Missouri medicine, 2012-01, Vol.109 (1), p.79-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2012 by the Missouri State Medical Association 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181674/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181674/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22428453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuu, Kenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spertus, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A Grantham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fengming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, James H</creatorcontrib><title>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</title><title>Missouri medicine</title><addtitle>Mo Med</addtitle><description>Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown. We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI. Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina. Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Science of Medicine</subject><issn>0026-6620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8g3TpH8iBPngoQqXlIlOMCJQ7RxN9QojYPtROq_x1ULgtMevtkZzZyQOWOiyIpCsBk5D-GTMVlpKc7ITIhc6FzJOXl_gWixj4G6CT2GaLcQkcYN0sHFBCx0tMEeW7vXtBQ7NNFOCaM3Y4Qe3Riocd714HfU9hH9tP9z_QU5baELeHm8C_J2f_e6fMxWzw9Py9tVNnDNYgaVUYiAKi_XbQm8kMgMVkpxrTQ2poSiLbkGoQWDKhcNE1gKJlUOecUR5YLcHHyHsdni2qR0D109-NTF72oHtv5PerupP9xUF1zzosyTwfXRwLuvMY1Qb20w2HWHdnUlKsW4LmVSXv2N-s34GVR-A9krdM4</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Lee, John H</creator><creator>Chuu, Kenny</creator><creator>Spertus, John</creator><creator>Cohen, David J</creator><creator>James, A Grantham</creator><creator>Tang, Fengming</creator><creator>O'Keefe, James H</creator><general>Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</title><author>Lee, John H ; Chuu, Kenny ; Spertus, John ; Cohen, David J ; James, A Grantham ; Tang, Fengming ; O'Keefe, James H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-a9c5eeae547df7a163e0ce9551858ebc7a6f718a2820a942b02e720354a491ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Science of Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuu, Kenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spertus, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, A Grantham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fengming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Keefe, James H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Missouri medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, John H</au><au>Chuu, Kenny</au><au>Spertus, John</au><au>Cohen, David J</au><au>James, A Grantham</au><au>Tang, Fengming</au><au>O'Keefe, James H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention</atitle><jtitle>Missouri medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mo Med</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>79-84</pages><issn>0026-6620</issn><abstract>Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), recent studies suggest that the benefits of PCI for chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are predominantly related to angina relief and improved quality of life. Whether patients in the current era understand these benefits of elective PCI, or perceive that they also derive protection against death and MI is unknown. We surveyed 498 consecutive elective PCI patients a mean of 13.7 months after being treated between 1/06-10/07, 2007, at two hospitals. We used a one-page questionnaire quantifying their perceptions of the benefits from PCI. Of 498 eligible subjects, 350 responded (70%). The mean age was 67.8 +/- 10.9 years, and 76% were male. One-third believed that their PCI was emergent (despite the fact that all were elective), 71% believed the procedure would prevent future heart attacks, 66% thought it would extend their life, 42% reported that it saved their life, 42% stated that it would improve abnormalities on their stress test, and only 31'% believed it would decrease their angina. Although considerable attention is given to facilitating informed consent at our center, patients' perceived benefits of elective PCI do not match existing evidence, as they overestimated both the benefits and urgency of their procedures. These findings suggest that an even greater effort at patient education is needed prior to elective PCI to facilitate fully informed decision-making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association</pub><pmid>22428453</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-6620
ispartof Missouri medicine, 2012-01, Vol.109 (1), p.79-84
issn 0026-6620
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6181674
source PubMed Central Free
subjects Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - psychology
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
Elective Surgical Procedures - psychology
Female
Humans
Male
Patients - psychology
Science of Medicine
title Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%20overestimate%20the%20potential%20benefits%20of%20elective%20percutaneous%20coronary%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Missouri%20medicine&rft.au=Lee,%20John%20H&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=79-84&rft.issn=0026-6620&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E929501873%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-a9c5eeae547df7a163e0ce9551858ebc7a6f718a2820a942b02e720354a491ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=929501873&rft_id=info:pmid/22428453&rfr_iscdi=true