Loading…

Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases

In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia) and vis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Translational vision science & technology 2018-09, Vol.7 (5), p.28-28
Main Authors: Thurman, Steven M, Maniglia, Marcello, Davey, Pinakin G, Biles, Mandy K, Visscher, Kristina M, Seitz, Aaron R
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9d301d86fb64e524e5397934e428f5fd67b732529c3ea838dc8656c0acd902c13
container_end_page 28
container_issue 5
container_start_page 28
container_title Translational vision science & technology
container_volume 7
creator Thurman, Steven M
Maniglia, Marcello
Davey, Pinakin G
Biles, Mandy K
Visscher, Kristina M
Seitz, Aaron R
description In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia) and visual sensitivity loss (scotoma). We first ran simulations of MAP with a computerized model of a human observer to determine optimal test design characteristics. In experiment 1, predictions of the model were assessed by simulating metamorphopsia with an eye-tracking device with 20 healthy vision participants. In experiment 2, eight patients (16 eyes) with macular disease completed two MAP assessments separated by about 12 weeks, while a subset (10 eyes) also completed repeated Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry and Amsler grid exams. Results revealed strong repeatability of MAP and high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (0.89, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively) in classifying patient eyes with severe visual impairment. We also found a significant relationship in terms of the spatial patterns of performance across visual field loci derived from MAP and MAIA microperimetry. However, there was a lack of correspondence between MAP and subjective Amsler grid reports in isolating perceptually distorted regions. These results highlight the validity and efficacy of MAP in producing quantitative maps of visual field disturbances, including simultaneous mapping of metamorphopsia and sensitivity impairment. Future work will be needed to assess applicability of this examination for potential early detection of MD symptoms and/or portable assessment on a home device or computer.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/tvst.7.5.28
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6192464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2125295611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9d301d86fb64e524e5397934e428f5fd67b732529c3ea838dc8656c0acd902c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LHEEQbUJCFPWUe-ijQWad_pzpHAKDiR_gmk1Icm16u2vWlt6ZtbtnZe_-cGfViBYUVVCP917xEPpEygkhsjrO65Qn1URMaP0O7VIieUGFIu9f7TvoIKWbcixZC87lR7TDSiak4nwX3U-HkH0RfAe4cWaV_RrwDKJfQo4bfDhtZl--4gZfwR2exd6CGyLgto_412C67NuN7xb4n0-DCfjUQ3D4osuwiD5vHmG_zco73KQEKS2hy7hv8dTYIZiIv_sEZjzsow-tCQkOnuce-nv648_JeXH58-zipLksLGMqF8qxkrhatnPJQdCxmaoU48Bp3YrWyWpeMSqosgxMzWpnaymkLY11qqSWsD307Yl3NcyX4OxoJ5qgV-O3Jm50b7x-e-n8tV70ay2JolzykeDwmSD2twOkrJc-WQjBdNAPSVOylReSbLWOnqA29ilFaF9kSKm30eltdLrSQtN6RH9-7ewF-z8o9gCELZaV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125295611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Thurman, Steven M ; Maniglia, Marcello ; Davey, Pinakin G ; Biles, Mandy K ; Visscher, Kristina M ; Seitz, Aaron R</creator><creatorcontrib>Thurman, Steven M ; Maniglia, Marcello ; Davey, Pinakin G ; Biles, Mandy K ; Visscher, Kristina M ; Seitz, Aaron R</creatorcontrib><description>In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia) and visual sensitivity loss (scotoma). We first ran simulations of MAP with a computerized model of a human observer to determine optimal test design characteristics. In experiment 1, predictions of the model were assessed by simulating metamorphopsia with an eye-tracking device with 20 healthy vision participants. In experiment 2, eight patients (16 eyes) with macular disease completed two MAP assessments separated by about 12 weeks, while a subset (10 eyes) also completed repeated Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry and Amsler grid exams. Results revealed strong repeatability of MAP and high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (0.89, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively) in classifying patient eyes with severe visual impairment. We also found a significant relationship in terms of the spatial patterns of performance across visual field loci derived from MAP and MAIA microperimetry. However, there was a lack of correspondence between MAP and subjective Amsler grid reports in isolating perceptually distorted regions. These results highlight the validity and efficacy of MAP in producing quantitative maps of visual field disturbances, including simultaneous mapping of metamorphopsia and sensitivity impairment. Future work will be needed to assess applicability of this examination for potential early detection of MD symptoms and/or portable assessment on a home device or computer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/tvst.7.5.28</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30356944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><ispartof>Translational vision science &amp; technology, 2018-09, Vol.7 (5), p.28-28</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2018 The Authors 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9d301d86fb64e524e5397934e428f5fd67b732529c3ea838dc8656c0acd902c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192464/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6192464/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356944$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thurman, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maniglia, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Pinakin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biles, Mandy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visscher, Kristina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Aaron R</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases</title><title>Translational vision science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><description>In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia) and visual sensitivity loss (scotoma). We first ran simulations of MAP with a computerized model of a human observer to determine optimal test design characteristics. In experiment 1, predictions of the model were assessed by simulating metamorphopsia with an eye-tracking device with 20 healthy vision participants. In experiment 2, eight patients (16 eyes) with macular disease completed two MAP assessments separated by about 12 weeks, while a subset (10 eyes) also completed repeated Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry and Amsler grid exams. Results revealed strong repeatability of MAP and high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (0.89, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively) in classifying patient eyes with severe visual impairment. We also found a significant relationship in terms of the spatial patterns of performance across visual field loci derived from MAP and MAIA microperimetry. However, there was a lack of correspondence between MAP and subjective Amsler grid reports in isolating perceptually distorted regions. These results highlight the validity and efficacy of MAP in producing quantitative maps of visual field disturbances, including simultaneous mapping of metamorphopsia and sensitivity impairment. Future work will be needed to assess applicability of this examination for potential early detection of MD symptoms and/or portable assessment on a home device or computer.</description><issn>2164-2591</issn><issn>2164-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LHEEQbUJCFPWUe-ijQWad_pzpHAKDiR_gmk1Icm16u2vWlt6ZtbtnZe_-cGfViBYUVVCP917xEPpEygkhsjrO65Qn1URMaP0O7VIieUGFIu9f7TvoIKWbcixZC87lR7TDSiak4nwX3U-HkH0RfAe4cWaV_RrwDKJfQo4bfDhtZl--4gZfwR2exd6CGyLgto_412C67NuN7xb4n0-DCfjUQ3D4osuwiD5vHmG_zco73KQEKS2hy7hv8dTYIZiIv_sEZjzsow-tCQkOnuce-nv648_JeXH58-zipLksLGMqF8qxkrhatnPJQdCxmaoU48Bp3YrWyWpeMSqosgxMzWpnaymkLY11qqSWsD307Yl3NcyX4OxoJ5qgV-O3Jm50b7x-e-n8tV70ay2JolzykeDwmSD2twOkrJc-WQjBdNAPSVOylReSbLWOnqA29ilFaF9kSKm30eltdLrSQtN6RH9-7ewF-z8o9gCELZaV</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Thurman, Steven M</creator><creator>Maniglia, Marcello</creator><creator>Davey, Pinakin G</creator><creator>Biles, Mandy K</creator><creator>Visscher, Kristina M</creator><creator>Seitz, Aaron R</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases</title><author>Thurman, Steven M ; Maniglia, Marcello ; Davey, Pinakin G ; Biles, Mandy K ; Visscher, Kristina M ; Seitz, Aaron R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9d301d86fb64e524e5397934e428f5fd67b732529c3ea838dc8656c0acd902c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thurman, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maniglia, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Pinakin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biles, Mandy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visscher, Kristina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Aaron R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational vision science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thurman, Steven M</au><au>Maniglia, Marcello</au><au>Davey, Pinakin G</au><au>Biles, Mandy K</au><au>Visscher, Kristina M</au><au>Seitz, Aaron R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases</atitle><jtitle>Translational vision science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>28-28</pages><issn>2164-2591</issn><eissn>2164-2591</eissn><abstract>In order to monitor visual defects associated with macular degeneration (MD), we present a new psychophysical assessment called multiline adaptive perimetry (MAP) that measures visual field integrity by simultaneously estimating regions associated with perceptual distortions (metamorphopsia) and visual sensitivity loss (scotoma). We first ran simulations of MAP with a computerized model of a human observer to determine optimal test design characteristics. In experiment 1, predictions of the model were assessed by simulating metamorphopsia with an eye-tracking device with 20 healthy vision participants. In experiment 2, eight patients (16 eyes) with macular disease completed two MAP assessments separated by about 12 weeks, while a subset (10 eyes) also completed repeated Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) microperimetry and Amsler grid exams. Results revealed strong repeatability of MAP and high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (0.89, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively) in classifying patient eyes with severe visual impairment. We also found a significant relationship in terms of the spatial patterns of performance across visual field loci derived from MAP and MAIA microperimetry. However, there was a lack of correspondence between MAP and subjective Amsler grid reports in isolating perceptually distorted regions. These results highlight the validity and efficacy of MAP in producing quantitative maps of visual field disturbances, including simultaneous mapping of metamorphopsia and sensitivity impairment. Future work will be needed to assess applicability of this examination for potential early detection of MD symptoms and/or portable assessment on a home device or computer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>30356944</pmid><doi>10.1167/tvst.7.5.28</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2164-2591
ispartof Translational vision science & technology, 2018-09, Vol.7 (5), p.28-28
issn 2164-2591
2164-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6192464
source PubMed Central
title Multi-line Adaptive Perimetry (MAP): A New Procedure for Quantifying Visual Field Integrity for Rapid Assessment of Macular Diseases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T11%3A19%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-line%20Adaptive%20Perimetry%20(MAP):%20A%20New%20Procedure%20for%20Quantifying%20Visual%20Field%20Integrity%20for%20Rapid%20Assessment%20of%20Macular%20Diseases&rft.jtitle=Translational%20vision%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Thurman,%20Steven%20M&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=28-28&rft.issn=2164-2591&rft.eissn=2164-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/tvst.7.5.28&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2125295611%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-9d301d86fb64e524e5397934e428f5fd67b732529c3ea838dc8656c0acd902c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125295611&rft_id=info:pmid/30356944&rfr_iscdi=true