Loading…
Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control
Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2018-11, Vol.8 (1), p.16769-8, Article 16769 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113 |
container_end_page | 8 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16769 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Boyer, Sebastien Pothin, Emilie Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha Rogier, Christophe Kesteman, Thomas |
description | Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6233220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2133430728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU9vFSEcJEZjm2e_gAdD4sULyr_dhYtJ06g1eYmXeiYs-9v3aHbhFdg2_fby3FprD3KBwPxmhhmE3jL6kVGhPmXJGq0IZYoIqTtNxAt0yqlsCBecv3xyPkFnOV_TuhquJdOv0YmgkjdciVPkriAXH3a495HAOHpn3T2OI_Yhgyve-QFISWALDDhAyfjOlz0e4Q4SnmO-WXyJkPEYE4awt8FV3Gwnm7zFLoaS4vQGvRrtlOHsYd-gn1-_XF1cku2Pb98vzrfENR0tBGTPxpZpV931g2ZKahBskNWrUm1TLzo-UDtoZzUHMYLooQKallvRc8bEBn1eeQ9LP8PgoKrbyRySn226N9F68-9L8Huzi7em5aLmRCsBWQn2z8Yuz7fmYHOBJRnKdKsYa26Pgh8eBFO8WWqQZvbZwTTZAHHJhjMhpKBdTXqD3j-DXsclhRrHEcW7yqqOhHxFuRRzTjA-umDUHGs3a-3VhDK_azeiDr17-u3HkT8lV4BYAbk-hR2kv9r_of0FItm4pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2132701981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Boyer, Sebastien ; Pothin, Emilie ; Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha ; Rogier, Christophe ; Kesteman, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Sebastien ; Pothin, Emilie ; Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha ; Rogier, Christophe ; Kesteman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30425283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/601/1466 ; 692/699/255/1629 ; Aquatic insects ; Bayesian analysis ; Control programs ; Culicidae ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Insecticides ; Laboratory methods ; Life Sciences ; Malaria ; Mortality ; Mosquitoes ; multidisciplinary ; Nets ; Other ; Public health ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2018-11, Vol.8 (1), p.16769-8, Article 16769</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7951-8261 ; 0000-0002-2946-586X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2132701981/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2132701981?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://riip.hal.science/pasteur-01968115$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pothin, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogier, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesteman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes.</description><subject>631/601/1466</subject><subject>692/699/255/1629</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Control programs</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nets</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU9vFSEcJEZjm2e_gAdD4sULyr_dhYtJ06g1eYmXeiYs-9v3aHbhFdg2_fby3FprD3KBwPxmhhmE3jL6kVGhPmXJGq0IZYoIqTtNxAt0yqlsCBecv3xyPkFnOV_TuhquJdOv0YmgkjdciVPkriAXH3a495HAOHpn3T2OI_Yhgyve-QFISWALDDhAyfjOlz0e4Q4SnmO-WXyJkPEYE4awt8FV3Gwnm7zFLoaS4vQGvRrtlOHsYd-gn1-_XF1cku2Pb98vzrfENR0tBGTPxpZpV931g2ZKahBskNWrUm1TLzo-UDtoZzUHMYLooQKallvRc8bEBn1eeQ9LP8PgoKrbyRySn226N9F68-9L8Huzi7em5aLmRCsBWQn2z8Yuz7fmYHOBJRnKdKsYa26Pgh8eBFO8WWqQZvbZwTTZAHHJhjMhpKBdTXqD3j-DXsclhRrHEcW7yqqOhHxFuRRzTjA-umDUHGs3a-3VhDK_azeiDr17-u3HkT8lV4BYAbk-hR2kv9r_of0FItm4pw</recordid><startdate>20181113</startdate><enddate>20181113</enddate><creator>Boyer, Sebastien</creator><creator>Pothin, Emilie</creator><creator>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</creator><creator>Rogier, Christophe</creator><creator>Kesteman, Thomas</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-8261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-586X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181113</creationdate><title>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</title><author>Boyer, Sebastien ; Pothin, Emilie ; Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha ; Rogier, Christophe ; Kesteman, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>631/601/1466</topic><topic>692/699/255/1629</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Control programs</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nets</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pothin, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogier, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesteman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyer, Sebastien</au><au>Pothin, Emilie</au><au>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</au><au>Rogier, Christophe</au><au>Kesteman, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2018-11-13</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16769</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>16769-8</pages><artnum>16769</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30425283</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-8261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-586X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2018-11, Vol.8 (1), p.16769-8, Article 16769 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6233220 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); PubMed Central; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 631/601/1466 692/699/255/1629 Aquatic insects Bayesian analysis Control programs Culicidae Humanities and Social Sciences Insecticides Laboratory methods Life Sciences Malaria Mortality Mosquitoes multidisciplinary Nets Other Public health Science Science (multidisciplinary) Vector-borne diseases |
title | Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20bio-efficacy%20of%20insecticide-treated%20nets%20with%20fewer%20mosquitoes%20for%20enhanced%20malaria%20control&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Boyer,%20Sebastien&rft.date=2018-11-13&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16769&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=16769-8&rft.artnum=16769&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2133430728%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132701981&rft_id=info:pmid/30425283&rfr_iscdi=true |