Loading…

Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control

Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2018-11, Vol.8 (1), p.16769-8, Article 16769
Main Authors: Boyer, Sebastien, Pothin, Emilie, Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha, Rogier, Christophe, Kesteman, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113
container_end_page 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16769
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 8
creator Boyer, Sebastien
Pothin, Emilie
Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha
Rogier, Christophe
Kesteman, Thomas
description Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6233220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2133430728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU9vFSEcJEZjm2e_gAdD4sULyr_dhYtJ06g1eYmXeiYs-9v3aHbhFdg2_fby3FprD3KBwPxmhhmE3jL6kVGhPmXJGq0IZYoIqTtNxAt0yqlsCBecv3xyPkFnOV_TuhquJdOv0YmgkjdciVPkriAXH3a495HAOHpn3T2OI_Yhgyve-QFISWALDDhAyfjOlz0e4Q4SnmO-WXyJkPEYE4awt8FV3Gwnm7zFLoaS4vQGvRrtlOHsYd-gn1-_XF1cku2Pb98vzrfENR0tBGTPxpZpV931g2ZKahBskNWrUm1TLzo-UDtoZzUHMYLooQKallvRc8bEBn1eeQ9LP8PgoKrbyRySn226N9F68-9L8Huzi7em5aLmRCsBWQn2z8Yuz7fmYHOBJRnKdKsYa26Pgh8eBFO8WWqQZvbZwTTZAHHJhjMhpKBdTXqD3j-DXsclhRrHEcW7yqqOhHxFuRRzTjA-umDUHGs3a-3VhDK_azeiDr17-u3HkT8lV4BYAbk-hR2kv9r_of0FItm4pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2132701981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Boyer, Sebastien ; Pothin, Emilie ; Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha ; Rogier, Christophe ; Kesteman, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Sebastien ; Pothin, Emilie ; Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha ; Rogier, Christophe ; Kesteman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30425283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/601/1466 ; 692/699/255/1629 ; Aquatic insects ; Bayesian analysis ; Control programs ; Culicidae ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Insecticides ; Laboratory methods ; Life Sciences ; Malaria ; Mortality ; Mosquitoes ; multidisciplinary ; Nets ; Other ; Public health ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2018-11, Vol.8 (1), p.16769-8, Article 16769</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7951-8261 ; 0000-0002-2946-586X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2132701981/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2132701981?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://riip.hal.science/pasteur-01968115$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pothin, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogier, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesteman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes.</description><subject>631/601/1466</subject><subject>692/699/255/1629</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Control programs</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nets</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU9vFSEcJEZjm2e_gAdD4sULyr_dhYtJ06g1eYmXeiYs-9v3aHbhFdg2_fby3FprD3KBwPxmhhmE3jL6kVGhPmXJGq0IZYoIqTtNxAt0yqlsCBecv3xyPkFnOV_TuhquJdOv0YmgkjdciVPkriAXH3a495HAOHpn3T2OI_Yhgyve-QFISWALDDhAyfjOlz0e4Q4SnmO-WXyJkPEYE4awt8FV3Gwnm7zFLoaS4vQGvRrtlOHsYd-gn1-_XF1cku2Pb98vzrfENR0tBGTPxpZpV931g2ZKahBskNWrUm1TLzo-UDtoZzUHMYLooQKallvRc8bEBn1eeQ9LP8PgoKrbyRySn226N9F68-9L8Huzi7em5aLmRCsBWQn2z8Yuz7fmYHOBJRnKdKsYa26Pgh8eBFO8WWqQZvbZwTTZAHHJhjMhpKBdTXqD3j-DXsclhRrHEcW7yqqOhHxFuRRzTjA-umDUHGs3a-3VhDK_azeiDr17-u3HkT8lV4BYAbk-hR2kv9r_of0FItm4pw</recordid><startdate>20181113</startdate><enddate>20181113</enddate><creator>Boyer, Sebastien</creator><creator>Pothin, Emilie</creator><creator>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</creator><creator>Rogier, Christophe</creator><creator>Kesteman, Thomas</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-8261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-586X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181113</creationdate><title>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</title><author>Boyer, Sebastien ; Pothin, Emilie ; Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha ; Rogier, Christophe ; Kesteman, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>631/601/1466</topic><topic>692/699/255/1629</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Control programs</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nets</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pothin, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogier, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesteman, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyer, Sebastien</au><au>Pothin, Emilie</au><au>Randriamaherijaona, Sanjiarizaha</au><au>Rogier, Christophe</au><au>Kesteman, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2018-11-13</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16769</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>16769-8</pages><artnum>16769</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Malaria control programs implementing Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) are encouraged to conduct field monitoring of nets’ survival, fabric integrity and insecticidal bio-efficacy. The reference method for testing the insecticide activity of LLINs needs 100 two-to-five-day-old female mosquitoes per net, which is highly resource-intensive. We aimed at identifying an alternative protocol, using fewer mosquitos, while ensuring a precision in the main indicator of ±5 percentage points (pp). We compared different laboratory methods against the probability of the LLIN to fail the test as determined by a hierarchical Bayesian model. When using 50 mosquitoes per LLIN and considering mortality only instead of mortality or knock-down as validity criteria, the average error in the measure of the proportion of nets considered as valid was 0.40 pp. The 95% confidence interval of this value never exceed 5 pp when the number of LLIN tested was ≥40. This method slightly outperforms the current recommendations. As a conclusion, testing the bio-efficacy of LLINs with half as many mosquitoes provides a valid evaluation of the proportion of valid LLINs. This approach could increase entomology labs’ testing capacity and decrease costs, with no impact in the decision process for public health purposes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30425283</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-8261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-586X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2018-11, Vol.8 (1), p.16769-8, Article 16769
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6233220
source Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); PubMed Central; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 631/601/1466
692/699/255/1629
Aquatic insects
Bayesian analysis
Control programs
Culicidae
Humanities and Social Sciences
Insecticides
Laboratory methods
Life Sciences
Malaria
Mortality
Mosquitoes
multidisciplinary
Nets
Other
Public health
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Vector-borne diseases
title Testing bio-efficacy of insecticide-treated nets with fewer mosquitoes for enhanced malaria control
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20bio-efficacy%20of%20insecticide-treated%20nets%20with%20fewer%20mosquitoes%20for%20enhanced%20malaria%20control&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Boyer,%20Sebastien&rft.date=2018-11-13&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16769&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=16769-8&rft.artnum=16769&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-018-34979-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2133430728%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-e4b1f619c304bd91849e31d4042886591872d0ad9ca92e3fe3bee31562a3b2113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132701981&rft_id=info:pmid/30425283&rfr_iscdi=true