Loading…

Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Brazilian Journal of Urology 2018-09, Vol.44 (5), p.987-995
Main Authors: Altunkol, Adem, Abat, Deniz, Sener, Nevzat Can, Gulum, Mehmet, Ciftci, Halil, Savas, Murat, Yeni, Ercan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c39285cf5d9a7807a780452f3b0e3e8da376edd4ae63e4b84a5511a4d01d2283
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c39285cf5d9a7807a780452f3b0e3e8da376edd4ae63e4b84a5511a4d01d2283
container_end_page 995
container_issue 5
container_start_page 987
container_title International Brazilian Journal of Urology
container_volume 44
creator Altunkol, Adem
Abat, Deniz
Sener, Nevzat Can
Gulum, Mehmet
Ciftci, Halil
Savas, Murat
Yeni, Ercan
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6237517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_91351464480f4dc2abd1e192ebb78141</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6237517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c39285cf5d9a7807a780452f3b0e3e8da376edd4ae63e4b84a5511a4d01d2283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcuOEzEQRVsIxAwD_2A-IMHlR7d7A0IjHpFGYgNrq2yXE4eOHbk7GeXvSScjpGxcrsc9m9M0H4EvQff80wht1y20lmaZ3PawFBzMkkOvXjX3l1UL0L9--c9nd827cdxyLnrewdvmTnKQ547fN8-rkR1qmTZUcX9iOJRMDEdGMZKf0vHSIPNl51LGKZXMSrxJ5MBcKpEoOPR_WcrMb9IQKmX2nKYNC6cxHrKfoziwY0kh5fWX982biMNIH17qQ_Pn-7ffjz8XT79-rB6_Pi28FmZatF72wmgfdeixM7ybH6VFlI6TJBNQdi2FoJBaScoZhVoDoAocghBGPjSrKzcU3Np9TTusJ1sw2cug1LXFOiU_kO1BalCtUoZHFbxAF4CgF-RcZ0DBmfX5ytof3I6CpzxVHG6gt5ucNnZdjrYVstPQnQH9FeBrGcdK8X8WuJ3N2otZOyuzs1k7m7WzWfkPQRCaPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Altunkol, Adem ; Abat, Deniz ; Sener, Nevzat Can ; Gulum, Mehmet ; Ciftci, Halil ; Savas, Murat ; Yeni, Ercan</creator><creatorcontrib>Altunkol, Adem ; Abat, Deniz ; Sener, Nevzat Can ; Gulum, Mehmet ; Ciftci, Halil ; Savas, Murat ; Yeni, Ercan</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p &lt; 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1677-5538</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1677-6119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1677-6119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30130020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</publisher><subject>Biofeedback ; Child ; Original ; Psychology ; Urinary Tract Infections</subject><ispartof>International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 2018-09, Vol.44 (5), p.987-995</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c39285cf5d9a7807a780452f3b0e3e8da376edd4ae63e4b84a5511a4d01d2283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c39285cf5d9a7807a780452f3b0e3e8da376edd4ae63e4b84a5511a4d01d2283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237517/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6237517/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altunkol, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abat, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sener, Nevzat Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulum, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciftci, Halil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savas, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeni, Ercan</creatorcontrib><title>Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?</title><title>International Brazilian Journal of Urology</title><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p &lt; 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.</description><subject>Biofeedback</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections</subject><issn>1677-5538</issn><issn>1677-6119</issn><issn>1677-6119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcuOEzEQRVsIxAwD_2A-IMHlR7d7A0IjHpFGYgNrq2yXE4eOHbk7GeXvSScjpGxcrsc9m9M0H4EvQff80wht1y20lmaZ3PawFBzMkkOvXjX3l1UL0L9--c9nd827cdxyLnrewdvmTnKQ547fN8-rkR1qmTZUcX9iOJRMDEdGMZKf0vHSIPNl51LGKZXMSrxJ5MBcKpEoOPR_WcrMb9IQKmX2nKYNC6cxHrKfoziwY0kh5fWX982biMNIH17qQ_Pn-7ffjz8XT79-rB6_Pi28FmZatF72wmgfdeixM7ybH6VFlI6TJBNQdi2FoJBaScoZhVoDoAocghBGPjSrKzcU3Np9TTusJ1sw2cug1LXFOiU_kO1BalCtUoZHFbxAF4CgF-RcZ0DBmfX5ytof3I6CpzxVHG6gt5ucNnZdjrYVstPQnQH9FeBrGcdK8X8WuJ3N2otZOyuzs1k7m7WzWfkPQRCaPw</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Altunkol, Adem</creator><creator>Abat, Deniz</creator><creator>Sener, Nevzat Can</creator><creator>Gulum, Mehmet</creator><creator>Ciftci, Halil</creator><creator>Savas, Murat</creator><creator>Yeni, Ercan</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?</title><author>Altunkol, Adem ; Abat, Deniz ; Sener, Nevzat Can ; Gulum, Mehmet ; Ciftci, Halil ; Savas, Murat ; Yeni, Ercan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c39285cf5d9a7807a780452f3b0e3e8da376edd4ae63e4b84a5511a4d01d2283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biofeedback</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altunkol, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abat, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sener, Nevzat Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulum, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciftci, Halil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savas, Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeni, Ercan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International Brazilian Journal of Urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altunkol, Adem</au><au>Abat, Deniz</au><au>Sener, Nevzat Can</au><au>Gulum, Mehmet</au><au>Ciftci, Halil</au><au>Savas, Murat</au><au>Yeni, Ercan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?</atitle><jtitle>International Brazilian Journal of Urology</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>987</spage><epage>995</epage><pages>987-995</pages><issn>1677-5538</issn><issn>1677-6119</issn><eissn>1677-6119</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p &lt; 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.</abstract><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</pub><pmid>30130020</pmid><doi>10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1677-5538
ispartof International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 2018-09, Vol.44 (5), p.987-995
issn 1677-5538
1677-6119
1677-6119
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6237517
source SciELO Brazil; PubMed Central
subjects Biofeedback
Child
Original
Psychology
Urinary Tract Infections
title Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A14%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20urotherapy%20alone%20as%20effective%20as%20a%20combination%20of%20urotherapy%20and%20biofeedback%20in%20children%20with%20dysfunctional%20voiding?&rft.jtitle=International%20Brazilian%20Journal%20of%20Urology&rft.au=Altunkol,%20Adem&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=987&rft.epage=995&rft.pages=987-995&rft.issn=1677-5538&rft.eissn=1677-6119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_doaj_%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6237517%3C/pubmedcentral_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-6c39285cf5d9a7807a780452f3b0e3e8da376edd4ae63e4b84a5511a4d01d2283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30130020&rfr_iscdi=true