Loading…
Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact
Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the densit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2018-01, Vol.586, p.11-20 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3 |
container_end_page | 20 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) |
container_volume | 586 |
creator | Clements, Cody S. Rasher, Douglas B. Hoey, Andrew S. Bonito, Victor E. Hay, Mark E. |
description | Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3354/meps12410 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6261525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26403465</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26403465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhS0EouVnwQFAXcIi4IkdJ1mAhCr-pEosgLXl2pPiKolD7CKx4w7ckJPgqqUCzWI0ep_ezDxCjoCeM5bxiwY7DykHukWGIEAkkJXlNhlSyCEpBKMDsuf9nFIQPBe7ZMBoFovnQ3L51KlgVT1SrRkFbDrXx6G2jQ1-5KqRXs7fn1-N0r1T9SyK2jUdBhusaw_ITqVqj4frvk9ebm-ex_fJ5PHuYXw9STQr85Ag5pUBXRVpoSA3VHCRllMFmSmw4NQwYzCrBHAsjTY5r1BVSmmkU1HG0myfXK18u8W0QaOxDfEs2fW2Uf2HdMrK_0prX-XMvUuRCsjSLBqcrg1697ZAH2Rjvca6Vi26hZcp8JICS8s8omcrND7sfY_VZg1QuYxbbuKO7Mnfuzbkb74ROF4Bcx9cv9FTwSnjImM_msmIMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2149013297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Clements, Cody S. ; Rasher, Douglas B. ; Hoey, Andrew S. ; Bonito, Victor E. ; Hay, Mark E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clements, Cody S. ; Rasher, Douglas B. ; Hoey, Andrew S. ; Bonito, Victor E. ; Hay, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><description>Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps12410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30505047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Inter-Research</publisher><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2018-01, Vol.586, p.11-20</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26403465$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26403465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clements, Cody S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasher, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoey, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonito, Victor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><addtitle>Mar Ecol Prog Ser</addtitle><description>Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery.</description><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhS0EouVnwQFAXcIi4IkdJ1mAhCr-pEosgLXl2pPiKolD7CKx4w7ckJPgqqUCzWI0ep_ezDxCjoCeM5bxiwY7DykHukWGIEAkkJXlNhlSyCEpBKMDsuf9nFIQPBe7ZMBoFovnQ3L51KlgVT1SrRkFbDrXx6G2jQ1-5KqRXs7fn1-N0r1T9SyK2jUdBhusaw_ITqVqj4frvk9ebm-ex_fJ5PHuYXw9STQr85Ag5pUBXRVpoSA3VHCRllMFmSmw4NQwYzCrBHAsjTY5r1BVSmmkU1HG0myfXK18u8W0QaOxDfEs2fW2Uf2HdMrK_0prX-XMvUuRCsjSLBqcrg1697ZAH2Rjvca6Vi26hZcp8JICS8s8omcrND7sfY_VZg1QuYxbbuKO7Mnfuzbkb74ROF4Bcx9cv9FTwSnjImM_msmIMw</recordid><startdate>20180111</startdate><enddate>20180111</enddate><creator>Clements, Cody S.</creator><creator>Rasher, Douglas B.</creator><creator>Hoey, Andrew S.</creator><creator>Bonito, Victor E.</creator><creator>Hay, Mark E.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180111</creationdate><title>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition</title><author>Clements, Cody S. ; Rasher, Douglas B. ; Hoey, Andrew S. ; Bonito, Victor E. ; Hay, Mark E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clements, Cody S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasher, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoey, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonito, Victor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clements, Cody S.</au><au>Rasher, Douglas B.</au><au>Hoey, Andrew S.</au><au>Bonito, Victor E.</au><au>Hay, Mark E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Ecol Prog Ser</addtitle><date>2018-01-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>586</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>11-20</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Inter-Research</pub><pmid>30505047</pmid><doi>10.3354/meps12410</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-8630 |
ispartof | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2018-01, Vol.586, p.11-20 |
issn | 0171-8630 1616-1599 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6261525 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
title | Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20and%20temporal%20limits%20of%20coral%E2%80%93macroalgal%20competition:%20the%20negative%20impacts%20of%20macroalgal%20density,%20proximity,%20and%20history%20of%20contact&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Clements,%20Cody%20S.&rft.date=2018-01-11&rft.volume=586&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=11-20&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps12410&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26403465%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2149013297&rft_id=info:pmid/30505047&rft_jstor_id=26403465&rfr_iscdi=true |