Loading…

Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact

Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the densit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2018-01, Vol.586, p.11-20
Main Authors: Clements, Cody S., Rasher, Douglas B., Hoey, Andrew S., Bonito, Victor E., Hay, Mark E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3
container_end_page 20
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 586
creator Clements, Cody S.
Rasher, Douglas B.
Hoey, Andrew S.
Bonito, Victor E.
Hay, Mark E.
description Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps12410
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6261525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26403465</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26403465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhS0EouVnwQFAXcIi4IkdJ1mAhCr-pEosgLXl2pPiKolD7CKx4w7ckJPgqqUCzWI0ep_ezDxCjoCeM5bxiwY7DykHukWGIEAkkJXlNhlSyCEpBKMDsuf9nFIQPBe7ZMBoFovnQ3L51KlgVT1SrRkFbDrXx6G2jQ1-5KqRXs7fn1-N0r1T9SyK2jUdBhusaw_ITqVqj4frvk9ebm-ex_fJ5PHuYXw9STQr85Ag5pUBXRVpoSA3VHCRllMFmSmw4NQwYzCrBHAsjTY5r1BVSmmkU1HG0myfXK18u8W0QaOxDfEs2fW2Uf2HdMrK_0prX-XMvUuRCsjSLBqcrg1697ZAH2Rjvca6Vi26hZcp8JICS8s8omcrND7sfY_VZg1QuYxbbuKO7Mnfuzbkb74ROF4Bcx9cv9FTwSnjImM_msmIMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2149013297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Clements, Cody S. ; Rasher, Douglas B. ; Hoey, Andrew S. ; Bonito, Victor E. ; Hay, Mark E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clements, Cody S. ; Rasher, Douglas B. ; Hoey, Andrew S. ; Bonito, Victor E. ; Hay, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><description>Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps12410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30505047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Inter-Research</publisher><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2018-01, Vol.586, p.11-20</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26403465$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26403465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clements, Cody S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasher, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoey, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonito, Victor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><addtitle>Mar Ecol Prog Ser</addtitle><description>Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery.</description><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1OwzAQhS0EouVnwQFAXcIi4IkdJ1mAhCr-pEosgLXl2pPiKolD7CKx4w7ckJPgqqUCzWI0ep_ezDxCjoCeM5bxiwY7DykHukWGIEAkkJXlNhlSyCEpBKMDsuf9nFIQPBe7ZMBoFovnQ3L51KlgVT1SrRkFbDrXx6G2jQ1-5KqRXs7fn1-N0r1T9SyK2jUdBhusaw_ITqVqj4frvk9ebm-ex_fJ5PHuYXw9STQr85Ag5pUBXRVpoSA3VHCRllMFmSmw4NQwYzCrBHAsjTY5r1BVSmmkU1HG0myfXK18u8W0QaOxDfEs2fW2Uf2HdMrK_0prX-XMvUuRCsjSLBqcrg1697ZAH2Rjvca6Vi26hZcp8JICS8s8omcrND7sfY_VZg1QuYxbbuKO7Mnfuzbkb74ROF4Bcx9cv9FTwSnjImM_msmIMw</recordid><startdate>20180111</startdate><enddate>20180111</enddate><creator>Clements, Cody S.</creator><creator>Rasher, Douglas B.</creator><creator>Hoey, Andrew S.</creator><creator>Bonito, Victor E.</creator><creator>Hay, Mark E.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180111</creationdate><title>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition</title><author>Clements, Cody S. ; Rasher, Douglas B. ; Hoey, Andrew S. ; Bonito, Victor E. ; Hay, Mark E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clements, Cody S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasher, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoey, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonito, Victor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clements, Cody S.</au><au>Rasher, Douglas B.</au><au>Hoey, Andrew S.</au><au>Bonito, Victor E.</au><au>Hay, Mark E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Ecol Prog Ser</addtitle><date>2018-01-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>586</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>11-20</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Tropical reefs are commonly transitioning from coral to macroalgal dominance, producing abrupt, and often lasting, shifts in community composition and ecosystem function. Although negative effects of macroalgae on corals are well documented, whether such effects vary with spatial scale or the density of macroalgae remains inadequately understood, as does the legacy of their impact on coral growth. Using adjacent coral- versus macroalgal-dominated areas, we tested effects of macroalgal competition on 2 common Indo-Pacific coral species. When corals were transplanted to areas of: (1) macroalgal dominance, (2) macroalgal dominance but with nearby macroalgae removed, or (3) coral dominance lacking macroalgae, coral growth was equivalently high in plots without macroalgae and low (62–90% less) in plots with macroalgae, regardless of location. In a separate experiment, we exposed corals to differing densities of the dominant macroalga Sargassum polycystum. Coral survivorship was high (≥93% after 3 mo) and did not differ among treatments, whereas the growth of both coral species decreased as a function of Sargassum density. When Sargassum was removed after 3 mo, there was no legacy effect of macroalgal density on coral growth over the next 6 mo; however, there was no compensation for previously depressed growth. In sum, macroalgal impacts were density-dependent, and occurred only if macroalgae were in close contact, and coral growth was resilient to prior macroalgal contact. The temporal and spatial constraints of these interactions suggest that corals may be surprisingly resilient to periodic macroalgal competition, which could have important implications for ecosystem trajectories that lead to reef decline or recovery.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Inter-Research</pub><pmid>30505047</pmid><doi>10.3354/meps12410</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2018-01, Vol.586, p.11-20
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6261525
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
title Spatial and temporal limits of coral–macroalgal competition: the negative impacts of macroalgal density, proximity, and history of contact
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20and%20temporal%20limits%20of%20coral%E2%80%93macroalgal%20competition:%20the%20negative%20impacts%20of%20macroalgal%20density,%20proximity,%20and%20history%20of%20contact&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Clements,%20Cody%20S.&rft.date=2018-01-11&rft.volume=586&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=11-20&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps12410&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26403465%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-ee7fd1cf828a17d064629ba15d8e840d3dde5f614e9dcd74feafaace0b69696c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2149013297&rft_id=info:pmid/30505047&rft_jstor_id=26403465&rfr_iscdi=true