Management patterns of gastric polyps in the United States

• Published in: Frontline gastroenterology 2019-01, Vol.10 (1), p.16-23
• Main Authors: Corral, Juan E, Keihanian, Tara, Diaz, Liege I, Morgan, Douglas R, Sussman, Daniel A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Colon; Endoscopy; Gastroenterology; Mutation; Studies; Variables
• ISSN: 2041-4137; 2041-4145
• DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100941

ObjectiveRecent guidelines on endoscopic sampling recommend complete gastric polyp removal for solitary fundic polyps >10 mm, hyperplastic polyps >5 mm and all adenomatous polyps. We aim to describe endoscopic approach to polyps in the time period prior to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines and to identify opportunities for clinical practice improvements.DesignRetrospective review of the Clinical Outcome Research Initiative (CORI) database, including all oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs). Reviewers grouped interventions during procedures based on instruments used for polyp sampling by forceps or snare polypectomy. Logistic regression estimated the effect of variables of interest on method of polypectomy.ResultsOf 783 037 OGDs reported in the CORI database, 25 670 (3.3%) described gastric polyps and met the inclusion criteria. Mean gastric polyp size was 6.5±4.9 mm, and 46.2% and 14.5% were located in the corpus and antrum, respectively. Polyps in the forceps group were smaller than polyps in the snare group (5.7±4.0 mm vs 9.3±6.4 mm, respectively, p10 mm that only underwent forceps biopsy. Forceps were used more frequently in the gastric fundus.ConclusionsSnare polypectomy was underused in gastric polyps, per current ASGE guidelines. Anatomical location and endoscopic features of polyps were important predictors of the approach to gastric polypectomy.