Loading…
Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage
Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified prote...
Saved in:
Published in: | DNA repair 2018-11, Vol.71, p.183-189 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3 |
container_end_page | 189 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | DNA repair |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Bellani, Marina A. Huang, Jing Paramasivam, Manikandan Pokharel, Durga Gichimu, Julia Zhang, Jing Seidman, Michael M. |
description | Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6340790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1568786418301885</els_id><sourcerecordid>30166246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1LAzEQDKJYrf4DkfsDdyaXXHL3IpT6VSj6os9hm9s7U665klwL_ntTqlVfhIFd2J3ZnSHkitGMUSZvllntwOM6yykrMxqR8yNyxgpZpqos5PGhl2JEzkNYUsoKJeUpGfEoIHMhz4iaraC1rk0Mdt2mA594DOveBQzJ0CfgBtuiSwZoW6yTu-dJUkNk4AU5aaALePlVx-Tt4f51-pTOXx5n08k8NULyIQXOBBVGKSpzVjYAFApWlrwSC8MruVBQ1UJVcVcZrA3wRqIxeS2MNAyV4WNyu9ddbxaruIFu8NDptbcr8B-6B6v_Tpx9122_1ZILqioaBcRewPg-BI_Ngcuo3gWpl3ofpN4FqWlEziPt-vfdA-k7uZ_HMLrfWvQ6GIsuurAezaDr3v5_4RPa9ocv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Bellani, Marina A. ; Huang, Jing ; Paramasivam, Manikandan ; Pokharel, Durga ; Gichimu, Julia ; Zhang, Jing ; Seidman, Michael M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellani, Marina A. ; Huang, Jing ; Paramasivam, Manikandan ; Pokharel, Durga ; Gichimu, Julia ; Zhang, Jing ; Seidman, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><description>Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-7864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-7856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30166246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antigen tag ; Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology ; Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity ; DNA - drug effects ; DNA Adducts - metabolism ; DNA damage response ; DNA Repair ; DNA Replication ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry - methods ; Interstrand crosslink ; Mutagenicity Tests - methods ; Replication independent repair ; Replication stress</subject><ispartof>DNA repair, 2018-11, Vol.71, p.183-189</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellani, Marina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paramasivam, Manikandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokharel, Durga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gichimu, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</title><title>DNA repair</title><addtitle>DNA Repair (Amst)</addtitle><description>Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.</description><subject>Antigen tag</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity</subject><subject>DNA - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA Adducts - metabolism</subject><subject>DNA damage response</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>DNA Replication</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Interstrand crosslink</subject><subject>Mutagenicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Replication independent repair</subject><subject>Replication stress</subject><issn>1568-7864</issn><issn>1568-7856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UF1LAzEQDKJYrf4DkfsDdyaXXHL3IpT6VSj6os9hm9s7U665klwL_ntTqlVfhIFd2J3ZnSHkitGMUSZvllntwOM6yykrMxqR8yNyxgpZpqos5PGhl2JEzkNYUsoKJeUpGfEoIHMhz4iaraC1rk0Mdt2mA594DOveBQzJ0CfgBtuiSwZoW6yTu-dJUkNk4AU5aaALePlVx-Tt4f51-pTOXx5n08k8NULyIQXOBBVGKSpzVjYAFApWlrwSC8MruVBQ1UJVcVcZrA3wRqIxeS2MNAyV4WNyu9ddbxaruIFu8NDptbcr8B-6B6v_Tpx9122_1ZILqioaBcRewPg-BI_Ngcuo3gWpl3ofpN4FqWlEziPt-vfdA-k7uZ_HMLrfWvQ6GIsuurAezaDr3v5_4RPa9ocv</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Bellani, Marina A.</creator><creator>Huang, Jing</creator><creator>Paramasivam, Manikandan</creator><creator>Pokharel, Durga</creator><creator>Gichimu, Julia</creator><creator>Zhang, Jing</creator><creator>Seidman, Michael M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</title><author>Bellani, Marina A. ; Huang, Jing ; Paramasivam, Manikandan ; Pokharel, Durga ; Gichimu, Julia ; Zhang, Jing ; Seidman, Michael M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antigen tag</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity</topic><topic>DNA - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA Adducts - metabolism</topic><topic>DNA damage response</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>DNA Replication</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Interstrand crosslink</topic><topic>Mutagenicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Replication independent repair</topic><topic>Replication stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellani, Marina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paramasivam, Manikandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokharel, Durga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gichimu, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>DNA repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellani, Marina A.</au><au>Huang, Jing</au><au>Paramasivam, Manikandan</au><au>Pokharel, Durga</au><au>Gichimu, Julia</au><au>Zhang, Jing</au><au>Seidman, Michael M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</atitle><jtitle>DNA repair</jtitle><addtitle>DNA Repair (Amst)</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>183</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>183-189</pages><issn>1568-7864</issn><eissn>1568-7856</eissn><abstract>Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30166246</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1568-7864 |
ispartof | DNA repair, 2018-11, Vol.71, p.183-189 |
issn | 1568-7864 1568-7856 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6340790 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Antigen tag Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity DNA - drug effects DNA Adducts - metabolism DNA damage response DNA Repair DNA Replication Humans Immunohistochemistry - methods Interstrand crosslink Mutagenicity Tests - methods Replication independent repair Replication stress |
title | Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A40%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20cellular%20responses%20to%20antigen%20tagged%20DNA%20damage&rft.jtitle=DNA%20repair&rft.au=Bellani,%20Marina%20A.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=183-189&rft.issn=1568-7864&rft.eissn=1568-7856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E30166246%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30166246&rfr_iscdi=true |