Loading…

Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage

Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified prote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:DNA repair 2018-11, Vol.71, p.183-189
Main Authors: Bellani, Marina A., Huang, Jing, Paramasivam, Manikandan, Pokharel, Durga, Gichimu, Julia, Zhang, Jing, Seidman, Michael M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3
container_end_page 189
container_issue
container_start_page 183
container_title DNA repair
container_volume 71
creator Bellani, Marina A.
Huang, Jing
Paramasivam, Manikandan
Pokharel, Durga
Gichimu, Julia
Zhang, Jing
Seidman, Michael M.
description Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6340790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1568786418301885</els_id><sourcerecordid>30166246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1LAzEQDKJYrf4DkfsDdyaXXHL3IpT6VSj6os9hm9s7U665klwL_ntTqlVfhIFd2J3ZnSHkitGMUSZvllntwOM6yykrMxqR8yNyxgpZpqos5PGhl2JEzkNYUsoKJeUpGfEoIHMhz4iaraC1rk0Mdt2mA594DOveBQzJ0CfgBtuiSwZoW6yTu-dJUkNk4AU5aaALePlVx-Tt4f51-pTOXx5n08k8NULyIQXOBBVGKSpzVjYAFApWlrwSC8MruVBQ1UJVcVcZrA3wRqIxeS2MNAyV4WNyu9ddbxaruIFu8NDptbcr8B-6B6v_Tpx9122_1ZILqioaBcRewPg-BI_Ngcuo3gWpl3ofpN4FqWlEziPt-vfdA-k7uZ_HMLrfWvQ6GIsuurAezaDr3v5_4RPa9ocv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Bellani, Marina A. ; Huang, Jing ; Paramasivam, Manikandan ; Pokharel, Durga ; Gichimu, Julia ; Zhang, Jing ; Seidman, Michael M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellani, Marina A. ; Huang, Jing ; Paramasivam, Manikandan ; Pokharel, Durga ; Gichimu, Julia ; Zhang, Jing ; Seidman, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><description>Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-7864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-7856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30166246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antigen tag ; Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology ; Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity ; DNA - drug effects ; DNA Adducts - metabolism ; DNA damage response ; DNA Repair ; DNA Replication ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry - methods ; Interstrand crosslink ; Mutagenicity Tests - methods ; Replication independent repair ; Replication stress</subject><ispartof>DNA repair, 2018-11, Vol.71, p.183-189</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellani, Marina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paramasivam, Manikandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokharel, Durga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gichimu, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</title><title>DNA repair</title><addtitle>DNA Repair (Amst)</addtitle><description>Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.</description><subject>Antigen tag</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity</subject><subject>DNA - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA Adducts - metabolism</subject><subject>DNA damage response</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>DNA Replication</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Interstrand crosslink</subject><subject>Mutagenicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Replication independent repair</subject><subject>Replication stress</subject><issn>1568-7864</issn><issn>1568-7856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UF1LAzEQDKJYrf4DkfsDdyaXXHL3IpT6VSj6os9hm9s7U665klwL_ntTqlVfhIFd2J3ZnSHkitGMUSZvllntwOM6yykrMxqR8yNyxgpZpqos5PGhl2JEzkNYUsoKJeUpGfEoIHMhz4iaraC1rk0Mdt2mA594DOveBQzJ0CfgBtuiSwZoW6yTu-dJUkNk4AU5aaALePlVx-Tt4f51-pTOXx5n08k8NULyIQXOBBVGKSpzVjYAFApWlrwSC8MruVBQ1UJVcVcZrA3wRqIxeS2MNAyV4WNyu9ddbxaruIFu8NDptbcr8B-6B6v_Tpx9122_1ZILqioaBcRewPg-BI_Ngcuo3gWpl3ofpN4FqWlEziPt-vfdA-k7uZ_HMLrfWvQ6GIsuurAezaDr3v5_4RPa9ocv</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Bellani, Marina A.</creator><creator>Huang, Jing</creator><creator>Paramasivam, Manikandan</creator><creator>Pokharel, Durga</creator><creator>Gichimu, Julia</creator><creator>Zhang, Jing</creator><creator>Seidman, Michael M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</title><author>Bellani, Marina A. ; Huang, Jing ; Paramasivam, Manikandan ; Pokharel, Durga ; Gichimu, Julia ; Zhang, Jing ; Seidman, Michael M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antigen tag</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity</topic><topic>DNA - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA Adducts - metabolism</topic><topic>DNA damage response</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>DNA Replication</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Interstrand crosslink</topic><topic>Mutagenicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Replication independent repair</topic><topic>Replication stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellani, Marina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paramasivam, Manikandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokharel, Durga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gichimu, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidman, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>DNA repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellani, Marina A.</au><au>Huang, Jing</au><au>Paramasivam, Manikandan</au><au>Pokharel, Durga</au><au>Gichimu, Julia</au><au>Zhang, Jing</au><au>Seidman, Michael M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage</atitle><jtitle>DNA repair</jtitle><addtitle>DNA Repair (Amst)</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>183</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>183-189</pages><issn>1568-7864</issn><eissn>1568-7856</eissn><abstract>Repair pathways of covalent DNA damage are understood in considerable detail due to decades of brilliant biochemical studies by many investigators. An important feature of these experiments is the defined adduct location on oligonucleotide or plasmid substrates that are incubated with purified proteins or cell free extracts. With some exceptions, this certainty is lost when the inquiry shifts to the response of living mammalian cells to the same adducts in genomic DNA. This reflects the limitation of assays, such as those based on immunofluorescence, that are widely used to follow responding proteins in cells exposed to a DNA reactive compound. The lack of effective reagents for adduct detection means that the proximity between responding proteins and an adduct must be assumed. Since these assumptions can be incorrect, models based on in vitro systems may fail to account for observations made in vivo. Here we discuss the use of a detection tag to address the problem of lesion location, as illustrated by our recent work on replication dependent and independent responses to interstrand crosslinks.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30166246</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1568-7864
ispartof DNA repair, 2018-11, Vol.71, p.183-189
issn 1568-7864
1568-7856
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6340790
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Antigen tag
Cross-Linking Reagents - pharmacology
Cross-Linking Reagents - toxicity
DNA - drug effects
DNA Adducts - metabolism
DNA damage response
DNA Repair
DNA Replication
Humans
Immunohistochemistry - methods
Interstrand crosslink
Mutagenicity Tests - methods
Replication independent repair
Replication stress
title Imaging cellular responses to antigen tagged DNA damage
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A40%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20cellular%20responses%20to%20antigen%20tagged%20DNA%20damage&rft.jtitle=DNA%20repair&rft.au=Bellani,%20Marina%20A.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=183-189&rft.issn=1568-7864&rft.eissn=1568-7856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.08.023&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E30166246%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a31404c7706218faa0a5188394bc396b7a9d4794637cedca3f6ecc2d4c6c1e7c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30166246&rfr_iscdi=true