Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes following Combined Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Instrumentation for the Treatment of Degenerative Spine Deformity: A Preliminary Retrospective Study

• Published in: BioMed research international 2019-01, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8
• Main Authors: Jian, Fengzeng, Cheng, Cheng, Zhang, Can, Wang, Kai, Wu, Hao
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Back pain; Back Pain - physiopathology; Clinical Study; Complications; Deformation; Degenerative disc disease; Disability Evaluation; Electromyography; Feasibility studies; Female; Humans; Instrumentation; Instruments; Joint surgery; Lordosis - diagnostic imaging; Lordosis - physiopathology; Lordosis - surgery; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiopathology; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods; Neurosurgery; Pain; Patients; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology; Postoperative Complications - surgery; Quality of Life; Radiography; Retrospective Studies; Sacrum; Scoliosis; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging; Scoliosis - physiopathology; Scoliosis - surgery; Spinal Fusion - methods; Spine; Spine (lumbar); Statistical analysis; Surgery; Technology, Radiologic; Treatment Outcome; Vertebrae
• ISSN: 2314-6133; 2314-6141
• DOI: 10.1155/2019/5672162

Objective. The authors recently used a combination of minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral fixation for the treatment of degenerative spine deformity. The early results were promising. Radiographic and clinical results as well as complications were retrospectively assessed in the current study. Methods. Eleven patients with degenerative spine deformity underwent combined OLIF and lateral instrumentation without real-time electromyography (EMG) monitoring. Radiographic measurements including coronal Cobb angle, central sacral vertebral line (CSVL), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertebral axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), and LL-PI (pelvic incidence) mismatch were taken preoperatively and at last follow-up postoperatively in all patients. Concurrently, the visual analog score (VAS) for back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were used to assess clinical outcomes. The fusion rate of OLIF cage, total blood loss, operation time, hospital stay, and complications were also evaluated. Results. At last follow-up, all patients who underwent combined OLIF and lateral instrumentation achieved statistically significant improvement in coronal Cobb angle (from 15.3±4.7° to 5.9±3.1°, p < 0.01), LL (from 34.3±9.0° to 48.2±8.5°, p < 0.01), PT (from 24.2±9.6° to 16.2±6.0°, p < 0.01), LL-PI mismatch (from 15.4±8.7° to 7.0±3.7°, p < 0.01), CSVL (from 2.1±2.2cm to 0.7±0.9cm, p = 0.01), and SVA (from 7.0±3.9cm to 2.9±1.8cm, p < 0.01). VAS for back pain (from 6.9±1.4 to 2.0±0.9, p < 0.05) and ODI (from 39.5±3.1 to 21.9±3.6, p < 0.01) improved significantly after surgery. Conclusions. A combination of OLIF and lateral instrumentation is an effective and safety means of achieving correction of both coronal and sagittal deformity, resulting in improvement of quality of life in patients with degenerative spine deformity. It is a promising way to treat patients with moderate degenerative spine deformity.