Statistical analysis of timeseries data reveals changes in 3D segmental coordination of balance in response to prosthetic ankle power on ramps

Active ankle-foot prostheses generate mechanical power during the push-off phase of gait, which can offer advantages over passive prostheses. However, these benefits manifest primarily in joint kinetics (e.g., joint work) and energetics (e.g., metabolic cost) rather than balance (whole-body angular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2019-02, Vol.9 (1), p.1272-1272, Article 1272
Main Authors: Pickle, Nathaniel T., Silverman, Anne K., Wilken, Jason M., Fey, Nicholas P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
639/166/985
639/166/988
692/1807/2781
692/308/409
692/308/575
9/10
Amputation
Ankle
Balance
Coordination
Feedback
Gait
Humanities and Social Sciences
Leg
multidisciplinary
Prostheses
Prosthetics
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Statistical analysis
Statistics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Active ankle-foot prostheses generate mechanical power during the push-off phase of gait, which can offer advantages over passive prostheses. However, these benefits manifest primarily in joint kinetics (e.g., joint work) and energetics (e.g., metabolic cost) rather than balance (whole-body angular momentum, H ), and are typically constrained to push-off. The purpose of this study was to analyze differences between active and passive prostheses and non-amputees in coordination of balance throughout gait on ramps. We used Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) to analyze time-series contributions of body segments (arms, legs, trunk) to three-dimensional H on uphill, downhill, and level grades. The trunk and prosthetic-side leg contributions to H at toe-off when using the active prosthesis were more similar to non-amputees compared to using a passive prosthesis. However, using either a passive or active prosthesis was different compared to non-amputees in trunk contributions to sagittal-plane H during mid-stance and transverse-plane H at toe-off. The intact side of the body was unaffected by prosthesis type. In contrast to clinical balance assessments (e.g., single-leg standing, functional reach), our analysis identifies significant changes in the mechanics of segmental coordination of balance during specific portions of the gait cycle, providing valuable biofeedback for targeted gait retraining.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-37581-9