Loading…

Similar polyethylene wear between cemented and cementless Oxford medial UKA: a 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trial on 79 patients using radiostereometry

Background and purpose - Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants have been associated with high polyethylene wear in hip arthroplasties. HA coating as a promoter of wear in knee arthroplasties has not been investigated. We compared the wear-rate of the polyethylene bearing for cemented and cementless HA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta orthopaedica 2019-01, Vol.90 (1), p.67-73
Main Authors: Horsager, Kristian, Madsen, Frank, Odgaard, Anders, Fink Jepsen, Claus, Rømer, Lone, Kristensen, Per Wagner, Kaptein, Bart L, Søballe, Kjeld, Stilling, Maiken
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-bb63443fdc3ca513564a5256c1191cffc75459cf8df3eeaa6c494db53ca8a08f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-bb63443fdc3ca513564a5256c1191cffc75459cf8df3eeaa6c494db53ca8a08f3
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Acta orthopaedica
container_volume 90
creator Horsager, Kristian
Madsen, Frank
Odgaard, Anders
Fink Jepsen, Claus
Rømer, Lone
Kristensen, Per Wagner
Kaptein, Bart L
Søballe, Kjeld
Stilling, Maiken
description Background and purpose - Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants have been associated with high polyethylene wear in hip arthroplasties. HA coating as a promoter of wear in knee arthroplasties has not been investigated. We compared the wear-rate of the polyethylene bearing for cemented and cementless HA-coated Oxford medial unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKA). Secondarily, we investigated whether wear-rates were influenced by overhang or impingement of the bearing. Patients and methods - 80 patients (mean age 64 years), treatment-blinded, were randomized to 1 of 3 Oxford medial UKA versions: cemented with double-pegged or single-pegged femoral component or cementless HA-coated with double-pegged femoral component (ratios 1:1:1). We compared wear between the cemented (n = 55) and cementless group (n = 25) (ratio 2:1). Wear, impingement, and overhang were quantified between surgery and 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Oxford Knee Score. Results - The mean wear-rate for patients without bearing overhang was 0.04 mm/year (95% CI 0.02-0.07) for the cemented group and 0.05 mm/year (CI 0.02-0.08) for the cementless group. The mean difference in wear was 0.008 mm/year (CI -0.04 to 0.03). No impingement was identified. Half of the patients had medial bearing overhang, mean 2.5 mm (1-5). Wear increased by 0.014 mm/year for each mm increment in overhang. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 39 for the cementless group and 38 for the cemented group at the 5-year follow-up. Interpretation - The wear-rates were similar for the 2 fixation methods, which supports further use of the cementless Oxford medial UKA. However, a caveat is a relatively large 95% CI of the mean difference in wear-rate. Component size and position is important as half of the patients presented with an additional increase in wear-rate due to medial bearing overhang. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00679120.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17453674.2018.1543757
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6366473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_90edee76c0eb478f9b9bb6648222cef3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2155156544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-bb63443fdc3ca513564a5256c1191cffc75459cf8df3eeaa6c494db53ca8a08f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIloWfAPKRSxY7_kjCAVFVfFRU6gF6thx7vHXlxIvtZQn_hn-Kw24reuHk8cx7bzyeV1UvCV4T3OE3pGWcipatG0y6NeGMtrx9VJ0u-ZqKrnl8H7fspHqW0i3GtGM9flqdUMwbQTp6Wv3-6kbnVUTb4GfIN7OHCdAeSmaAvAeYkIYRpgwGqckcLx5SQlc_bYgGjWCc8uj6y9lbpBCv54Vrg_dhX--2KBZWGN2vwtdhyrEUSpjjwgkTanu0VdkVzYR2yU2bQjAupAwRwgg5zs-rJ1b5BC-O56q6_vjh2_nn-vLq08X52WWtOWW5HgZBGaPWaKoVJ5QLpnjDhSakJ9pa3XLGe207YymAUkKznpmBF3SncGfpqro46JqgbuU2ulHFWQbl5N9EiBupYnbag-wxGIBWaAwDazvbD31pL1jXNI0GS4vWu4PWdjeU_9FlvKj8A9GHlcndyE34IQUtMu0i8PooEMP3HaQsR5c0eK8mCLskG8I54YKXiVcVP0B1DClFsPdtCJaLVeSdVeRiFXm0SuG9-veN96w7bxTA-wPATWXRo9qH6I3MavYh2rJW7ZKk_-_xByyX0wI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155156544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Similar polyethylene wear between cemented and cementless Oxford medial UKA: a 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trial on 79 patients using radiostereometry</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>SPORTDiscus</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Horsager, Kristian ; Madsen, Frank ; Odgaard, Anders ; Fink Jepsen, Claus ; Rømer, Lone ; Kristensen, Per Wagner ; Kaptein, Bart L ; Søballe, Kjeld ; Stilling, Maiken</creator><creatorcontrib>Horsager, Kristian ; Madsen, Frank ; Odgaard, Anders ; Fink Jepsen, Claus ; Rømer, Lone ; Kristensen, Per Wagner ; Kaptein, Bart L ; Søballe, Kjeld ; Stilling, Maiken</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose - Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants have been associated with high polyethylene wear in hip arthroplasties. HA coating as a promoter of wear in knee arthroplasties has not been investigated. We compared the wear-rate of the polyethylene bearing for cemented and cementless HA-coated Oxford medial unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKA). Secondarily, we investigated whether wear-rates were influenced by overhang or impingement of the bearing. Patients and methods - 80 patients (mean age 64 years), treatment-blinded, were randomized to 1 of 3 Oxford medial UKA versions: cemented with double-pegged or single-pegged femoral component or cementless HA-coated with double-pegged femoral component (ratios 1:1:1). We compared wear between the cemented (n = 55) and cementless group (n = 25) (ratio 2:1). Wear, impingement, and overhang were quantified between surgery and 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Oxford Knee Score. Results - The mean wear-rate for patients without bearing overhang was 0.04 mm/year (95% CI 0.02-0.07) for the cemented group and 0.05 mm/year (CI 0.02-0.08) for the cementless group. The mean difference in wear was 0.008 mm/year (CI -0.04 to 0.03). No impingement was identified. Half of the patients had medial bearing overhang, mean 2.5 mm (1-5). Wear increased by 0.014 mm/year for each mm increment in overhang. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 39 for the cementless group and 38 for the cemented group at the 5-year follow-up. Interpretation - The wear-rates were similar for the 2 fixation methods, which supports further use of the cementless Oxford medial UKA. However, a caveat is a relatively large 95% CI of the mean difference in wear-rate. Component size and position is important as half of the patients presented with an additional increase in wear-rate due to medial bearing overhang. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00679120.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-3674</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1745-3682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1543757</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30526183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sweden: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Bone Cements - therapeutic use ; Cementation - methods ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible - therapeutic use ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Polyethylene - therapeutic use ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Radiostereometric Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Acta orthopaedica, 2019-01, Vol.90 (1), p.67-73</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Taylor &amp; Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by Taylor &amp; Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. 2018 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-bb63443fdc3ca513564a5256c1191cffc75459cf8df3eeaa6c494db53ca8a08f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-bb63443fdc3ca513564a5256c1191cffc75459cf8df3eeaa6c494db53ca8a08f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366473/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366473/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27479,27901,27902,53766,53768,59116,59117</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horsager, Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odgaard, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink Jepsen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rømer, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Per Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaptein, Bart L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søballe, Kjeld</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stilling, Maiken</creatorcontrib><title>Similar polyethylene wear between cemented and cementless Oxford medial UKA: a 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trial on 79 patients using radiostereometry</title><title>Acta orthopaedica</title><addtitle>Acta Orthop</addtitle><description>Background and purpose - Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants have been associated with high polyethylene wear in hip arthroplasties. HA coating as a promoter of wear in knee arthroplasties has not been investigated. We compared the wear-rate of the polyethylene bearing for cemented and cementless HA-coated Oxford medial unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKA). Secondarily, we investigated whether wear-rates were influenced by overhang or impingement of the bearing. Patients and methods - 80 patients (mean age 64 years), treatment-blinded, were randomized to 1 of 3 Oxford medial UKA versions: cemented with double-pegged or single-pegged femoral component or cementless HA-coated with double-pegged femoral component (ratios 1:1:1). We compared wear between the cemented (n = 55) and cementless group (n = 25) (ratio 2:1). Wear, impingement, and overhang were quantified between surgery and 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Oxford Knee Score. Results - The mean wear-rate for patients without bearing overhang was 0.04 mm/year (95% CI 0.02-0.07) for the cemented group and 0.05 mm/year (CI 0.02-0.08) for the cementless group. The mean difference in wear was 0.008 mm/year (CI -0.04 to 0.03). No impingement was identified. Half of the patients had medial bearing overhang, mean 2.5 mm (1-5). Wear increased by 0.014 mm/year for each mm increment in overhang. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 39 for the cementless group and 38 for the cemented group at the 5-year follow-up. Interpretation - The wear-rates were similar for the 2 fixation methods, which supports further use of the cementless Oxford medial UKA. However, a caveat is a relatively large 95% CI of the mean difference in wear-rate. Component size and position is important as half of the patients presented with an additional increase in wear-rate due to medial bearing overhang. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00679120.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cementation - methods</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Polyethylene - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Radiostereometric Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1745-3674</issn><issn>1745-3682</issn><issn>1745-3682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIloWfAPKRSxY7_kjCAVFVfFRU6gF6thx7vHXlxIvtZQn_hn-Kw24reuHk8cx7bzyeV1UvCV4T3OE3pGWcipatG0y6NeGMtrx9VJ0u-ZqKrnl8H7fspHqW0i3GtGM9flqdUMwbQTp6Wv3-6kbnVUTb4GfIN7OHCdAeSmaAvAeYkIYRpgwGqckcLx5SQlc_bYgGjWCc8uj6y9lbpBCv54Vrg_dhX--2KBZWGN2vwtdhyrEUSpjjwgkTanu0VdkVzYR2yU2bQjAupAwRwgg5zs-rJ1b5BC-O56q6_vjh2_nn-vLq08X52WWtOWW5HgZBGaPWaKoVJ5QLpnjDhSakJ9pa3XLGe207YymAUkKznpmBF3SncGfpqro46JqgbuU2ulHFWQbl5N9EiBupYnbag-wxGIBWaAwDazvbD31pL1jXNI0GS4vWu4PWdjeU_9FlvKj8A9GHlcndyE34IQUtMu0i8PooEMP3HaQsR5c0eK8mCLskG8I54YKXiVcVP0B1DClFsPdtCJaLVeSdVeRiFXm0SuG9-veN96w7bxTA-wPATWXRo9qH6I3MavYh2rJW7ZKk_-_xByyX0wI</recordid><startdate>20190102</startdate><enddate>20190102</enddate><creator>Horsager, Kristian</creator><creator>Madsen, Frank</creator><creator>Odgaard, Anders</creator><creator>Fink Jepsen, Claus</creator><creator>Rømer, Lone</creator><creator>Kristensen, Per Wagner</creator><creator>Kaptein, Bart L</creator><creator>Søballe, Kjeld</creator><creator>Stilling, Maiken</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Medical Journals Sweden</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190102</creationdate><title>Similar polyethylene wear between cemented and cementless Oxford medial UKA: a 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trial on 79 patients using radiostereometry</title><author>Horsager, Kristian ; Madsen, Frank ; Odgaard, Anders ; Fink Jepsen, Claus ; Rømer, Lone ; Kristensen, Per Wagner ; Kaptein, Bart L ; Søballe, Kjeld ; Stilling, Maiken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-bb63443fdc3ca513564a5256c1191cffc75459cf8df3eeaa6c494db53ca8a08f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cementation - methods</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Polyethylene - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Radiostereometric Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horsager, Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odgaard, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink Jepsen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rømer, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Per Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaptein, Bart L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søballe, Kjeld</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stilling, Maiken</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta orthopaedica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horsager, Kristian</au><au>Madsen, Frank</au><au>Odgaard, Anders</au><au>Fink Jepsen, Claus</au><au>Rømer, Lone</au><au>Kristensen, Per Wagner</au><au>Kaptein, Bart L</au><au>Søballe, Kjeld</au><au>Stilling, Maiken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Similar polyethylene wear between cemented and cementless Oxford medial UKA: a 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trial on 79 patients using radiostereometry</atitle><jtitle>Acta orthopaedica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Orthop</addtitle><date>2019-01-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>67-73</pages><issn>1745-3674</issn><issn>1745-3682</issn><eissn>1745-3682</eissn><abstract>Background and purpose - Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants have been associated with high polyethylene wear in hip arthroplasties. HA coating as a promoter of wear in knee arthroplasties has not been investigated. We compared the wear-rate of the polyethylene bearing for cemented and cementless HA-coated Oxford medial unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKA). Secondarily, we investigated whether wear-rates were influenced by overhang or impingement of the bearing. Patients and methods - 80 patients (mean age 64 years), treatment-blinded, were randomized to 1 of 3 Oxford medial UKA versions: cemented with double-pegged or single-pegged femoral component or cementless HA-coated with double-pegged femoral component (ratios 1:1:1). We compared wear between the cemented (n = 55) and cementless group (n = 25) (ratio 2:1). Wear, impingement, and overhang were quantified between surgery and 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Oxford Knee Score. Results - The mean wear-rate for patients without bearing overhang was 0.04 mm/year (95% CI 0.02-0.07) for the cemented group and 0.05 mm/year (CI 0.02-0.08) for the cementless group. The mean difference in wear was 0.008 mm/year (CI -0.04 to 0.03). No impingement was identified. Half of the patients had medial bearing overhang, mean 2.5 mm (1-5). Wear increased by 0.014 mm/year for each mm increment in overhang. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 39 for the cementless group and 38 for the cemented group at the 5-year follow-up. Interpretation - The wear-rates were similar for the 2 fixation methods, which supports further use of the cementless Oxford medial UKA. However, a caveat is a relatively large 95% CI of the mean difference in wear-rate. Component size and position is important as half of the patients presented with an additional increase in wear-rate due to medial bearing overhang. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00679120.</abstract><cop>Sweden</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>30526183</pmid><doi>10.1080/17453674.2018.1543757</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1745-3674
ispartof Acta orthopaedica, 2019-01, Vol.90 (1), p.67-73
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
1745-3682
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6366473
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; SPORTDiscus; PubMed Central
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Bone Cements - therapeutic use
Cementation - methods
Coated Materials, Biocompatible - therapeutic use
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Polyethylene - therapeutic use
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Radiostereometric Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Similar polyethylene wear between cemented and cementless Oxford medial UKA: a 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trial on 79 patients using radiostereometry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Similar%20polyethylene%20wear%20between%20cemented%20and%20cementless%20Oxford%20medial%20UKA:%20a%205-year%20follow-up%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%20on%2079%20patients%20using%20radiostereometry&rft.jtitle=Acta%20orthopaedica&rft.au=Horsager,%20Kristian&rft.date=2019-01-02&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=67-73&rft.issn=1745-3674&rft.eissn=1745-3682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17453674.2018.1543757&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2155156544%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-bb63443fdc3ca513564a5256c1191cffc75459cf8df3eeaa6c494db53ca8a08f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155156544&rft_id=info:pmid/30526183&rfr_iscdi=true