Loading…

Results of a fast-track knee arthroplasty according to the experience of a multidisciplinary team

AbstractIntroductionFast-Track is a multidisciplinary system that has changed the perception of total knee arthroplasty surgery. It's based on the education of the patient, an increased autonomy, adequate pain control and early mobilization. In the bibliography, there are no articles that refer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedics 2019-05, Vol.16 (3), p.201-205
Main Authors: Pujol, Oriol, García, Borja, Faura, Teresa, Nuevo, Montse, Maculé, Francisco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4f81d64940c4183c85877f8ec6c3cb2b730b3c0328c28bf598c0319dec8cfc123
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4f81d64940c4183c85877f8ec6c3cb2b730b3c0328c28bf598c0319dec8cfc123
container_end_page 205
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
container_title Journal of orthopaedics
container_volume 16
creator Pujol, Oriol
García, Borja
Faura, Teresa
Nuevo, Montse
Maculé, Francisco
description AbstractIntroductionFast-Track is a multidisciplinary system that has changed the perception of total knee arthroplasty surgery. It's based on the education of the patient, an increased autonomy, adequate pain control and early mobilization. In the bibliography, there are no articles that refer to the evolution of the protocol once established, and most of them are comparatives with the previously existing conventional system. For this reason, the objective of our work is to study the evolution of the clinical results obtained through a Fast-Track system according to the experience acquired by the multidisciplinary team in this protocol.Material and methodsIt's a prospective observational study. We have analyzed the results obtained in our center from its implementation in 2013 (n = 65) to the end of the study in 2016 (n = 60). We evaluated the pain at 24 and 48 h after surgery, the time until the first ambulation, the range of flexion and extension at discharge, and length of hospital stay.ResultsThe results obtained at the beginning of the implantation of the Fast-Track protocol in our center and the present ones do not present statistically significant differences. Mean pain at 24 h was 1,65/10 in 2013 and 1,5/10 in 2016, and at 48 h 1,61/10 and 1,58/10 respectively. Most of the patients in both years scored a pain below 4/10 at 24 h and 48 h. Mean time of the first ambulation was 260 min in 2013 and 254 min in 2016 (most of the patients started walking in ≤5 h). Mean flexion at discharge was 90,3° in 2013 and 87,92° in 2016 (most of the patients presented a flexion between 80 and 100°). Mean extension at discharge was 6,95° in 2013 and 8,1° in 2016 (most of the patients presented an extension between 0 and 10°). Mean length of stay was 2,46 days in 2013 and 2,43 days in 2016 (most of the patients had a stay of fewer than 4 days).ConclusionsWhen applying the Fast-Track protocol by a multidisciplinary team in primary knee prosthetic surgery, the clinical results obtained are independent of the experience of this team in the protocol. So, from our experience, we can affirm that the protocol has enough solidity since its beginning and it maintains similar results despite the years of execution.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.020
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6411603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0972978X18303763</els_id><sourcerecordid>2197324137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4f81d64940c4183c85877f8ec6c3cb2b730b3c0328c28bf598c0319dec8cfc123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ul1r1UAQDaLYWv0Bvsg--pLrfuQmG4SClFqFguAH-LZsJpPezU2ycXdTvP--E24t1QdhYL_mnJ05Z7LsteAbwUX5rt_0PmwkF_WGSwr-JDvldSXzutI_nz7an2QvYuw5V3JbqufZieI1L4VUp5n9inEZUmS-Y5Z1NqY8BQt7tp8QmQ1pF_w80PWBWQAfWjfdsORZ2iHD3zMGhxPgET0SkWtdBDcPbrLhwBLa8WX2rLNDxFf361n24-Pl94tP-fWXq88XH65z2PIy5UWnRVsWdcGhEFqB3uqq6jRCCQoa2VSKNwqoAw1SN9221nQQdYugoQPq5Sw7P_LOSzNiCzhRI4OZgxupFOOtM3-_TG5nbvytKQshSq6I4O09QfC_FozJjNQLDoOd0C_RSFFXShZCVZQqjqkQfIwBu4dvBDerNaY3ZI1ZrTFcUnDCvHlc3wPijxeU8P6YgKTSrcNgSMlV3dYFhGRa7_5Lf_4PGsgEB3bY4wFj75cwkfxGmEgA822djXU0SGuuqlKpOyKWtn0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2197324137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of a fast-track knee arthroplasty according to the experience of a multidisciplinary team</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pujol, Oriol ; García, Borja ; Faura, Teresa ; Nuevo, Montse ; Maculé, Francisco</creator><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Oriol ; García, Borja ; Faura, Teresa ; Nuevo, Montse ; Maculé, Francisco</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractIntroductionFast-Track is a multidisciplinary system that has changed the perception of total knee arthroplasty surgery. It's based on the education of the patient, an increased autonomy, adequate pain control and early mobilization. In the bibliography, there are no articles that refer to the evolution of the protocol once established, and most of them are comparatives with the previously existing conventional system. For this reason, the objective of our work is to study the evolution of the clinical results obtained through a Fast-Track system according to the experience acquired by the multidisciplinary team in this protocol.Material and methodsIt's a prospective observational study. We have analyzed the results obtained in our center from its implementation in 2013 (n = 65) to the end of the study in 2016 (n = 60). We evaluated the pain at 24 and 48 h after surgery, the time until the first ambulation, the range of flexion and extension at discharge, and length of hospital stay.ResultsThe results obtained at the beginning of the implantation of the Fast-Track protocol in our center and the present ones do not present statistically significant differences. Mean pain at 24 h was 1,65/10 in 2013 and 1,5/10 in 2016, and at 48 h 1,61/10 and 1,58/10 respectively. Most of the patients in both years scored a pain below 4/10 at 24 h and 48 h. Mean time of the first ambulation was 260 min in 2013 and 254 min in 2016 (most of the patients started walking in ≤5 h). Mean flexion at discharge was 90,3° in 2013 and 87,92° in 2016 (most of the patients presented a flexion between 80 and 100°). Mean extension at discharge was 6,95° in 2013 and 8,1° in 2016 (most of the patients presented an extension between 0 and 10°). Mean length of stay was 2,46 days in 2013 and 2,43 days in 2016 (most of the patients had a stay of fewer than 4 days).ConclusionsWhen applying the Fast-Track protocol by a multidisciplinary team in primary knee prosthetic surgery, the clinical results obtained are independent of the experience of this team in the protocol. So, from our experience, we can affirm that the protocol has enough solidity since its beginning and it maintains similar results despite the years of execution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-978X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0972-978X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30906123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Experience ; Fast track ; Knee arthroplasty ; Multidisciplinary team ; Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedics, 2019-05, Vol.16 (3), p.201-205</ispartof><rights>Prof. PK Surendran Memorial Education Foundation</rights><rights>2019 Prof. PK Surendran Memorial Education Foundation</rights><rights>2019 Prof. PK Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. 2019 Prof. PK Surendran Memorial Education Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4f81d64940c4183c85877f8ec6c3cb2b730b3c0328c28bf598c0319dec8cfc123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4f81d64940c4183c85877f8ec6c3cb2b730b3c0328c28bf598c0319dec8cfc123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411603/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411603/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30906123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Oriol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García, Borja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faura, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuevo, Montse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maculé, Francisco</creatorcontrib><title>Results of a fast-track knee arthroplasty according to the experience of a multidisciplinary team</title><title>Journal of orthopaedics</title><addtitle>J Orthop</addtitle><description>AbstractIntroductionFast-Track is a multidisciplinary system that has changed the perception of total knee arthroplasty surgery. It's based on the education of the patient, an increased autonomy, adequate pain control and early mobilization. In the bibliography, there are no articles that refer to the evolution of the protocol once established, and most of them are comparatives with the previously existing conventional system. For this reason, the objective of our work is to study the evolution of the clinical results obtained through a Fast-Track system according to the experience acquired by the multidisciplinary team in this protocol.Material and methodsIt's a prospective observational study. We have analyzed the results obtained in our center from its implementation in 2013 (n = 65) to the end of the study in 2016 (n = 60). We evaluated the pain at 24 and 48 h after surgery, the time until the first ambulation, the range of flexion and extension at discharge, and length of hospital stay.ResultsThe results obtained at the beginning of the implantation of the Fast-Track protocol in our center and the present ones do not present statistically significant differences. Mean pain at 24 h was 1,65/10 in 2013 and 1,5/10 in 2016, and at 48 h 1,61/10 and 1,58/10 respectively. Most of the patients in both years scored a pain below 4/10 at 24 h and 48 h. Mean time of the first ambulation was 260 min in 2013 and 254 min in 2016 (most of the patients started walking in ≤5 h). Mean flexion at discharge was 90,3° in 2013 and 87,92° in 2016 (most of the patients presented a flexion between 80 and 100°). Mean extension at discharge was 6,95° in 2013 and 8,1° in 2016 (most of the patients presented an extension between 0 and 10°). Mean length of stay was 2,46 days in 2013 and 2,43 days in 2016 (most of the patients had a stay of fewer than 4 days).ConclusionsWhen applying the Fast-Track protocol by a multidisciplinary team in primary knee prosthetic surgery, the clinical results obtained are independent of the experience of this team in the protocol. So, from our experience, we can affirm that the protocol has enough solidity since its beginning and it maintains similar results despite the years of execution.</description><subject>Experience</subject><subject>Fast track</subject><subject>Knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary team</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>0972-978X</issn><issn>0972-978X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Ul1r1UAQDaLYWv0Bvsg--pLrfuQmG4SClFqFguAH-LZsJpPezU2ycXdTvP--E24t1QdhYL_mnJ05Z7LsteAbwUX5rt_0PmwkF_WGSwr-JDvldSXzutI_nz7an2QvYuw5V3JbqufZieI1L4VUp5n9inEZUmS-Y5Z1NqY8BQt7tp8QmQ1pF_w80PWBWQAfWjfdsORZ2iHD3zMGhxPgET0SkWtdBDcPbrLhwBLa8WX2rLNDxFf361n24-Pl94tP-fWXq88XH65z2PIy5UWnRVsWdcGhEFqB3uqq6jRCCQoa2VSKNwqoAw1SN9221nQQdYugoQPq5Sw7P_LOSzNiCzhRI4OZgxupFOOtM3-_TG5nbvytKQshSq6I4O09QfC_FozJjNQLDoOd0C_RSFFXShZCVZQqjqkQfIwBu4dvBDerNaY3ZI1ZrTFcUnDCvHlc3wPijxeU8P6YgKTSrcNgSMlV3dYFhGRa7_5Lf_4PGsgEB3bY4wFj75cwkfxGmEgA822djXU0SGuuqlKpOyKWtn0</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Pujol, Oriol</creator><creator>García, Borja</creator><creator>Faura, Teresa</creator><creator>Nuevo, Montse</creator><creator>Maculé, Francisco</creator><general>Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Results of a fast-track knee arthroplasty according to the experience of a multidisciplinary team</title><author>Pujol, Oriol ; García, Borja ; Faura, Teresa ; Nuevo, Montse ; Maculé, Francisco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4f81d64940c4183c85877f8ec6c3cb2b730b3c0328c28bf598c0319dec8cfc123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Experience</topic><topic>Fast track</topic><topic>Knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary team</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Oriol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García, Borja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faura, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuevo, Montse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maculé, Francisco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pujol, Oriol</au><au>García, Borja</au><au>Faura, Teresa</au><au>Nuevo, Montse</au><au>Maculé, Francisco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of a fast-track knee arthroplasty according to the experience of a multidisciplinary team</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>201-205</pages><issn>0972-978X</issn><eissn>0972-978X</eissn><abstract>AbstractIntroductionFast-Track is a multidisciplinary system that has changed the perception of total knee arthroplasty surgery. It's based on the education of the patient, an increased autonomy, adequate pain control and early mobilization. In the bibliography, there are no articles that refer to the evolution of the protocol once established, and most of them are comparatives with the previously existing conventional system. For this reason, the objective of our work is to study the evolution of the clinical results obtained through a Fast-Track system according to the experience acquired by the multidisciplinary team in this protocol.Material and methodsIt's a prospective observational study. We have analyzed the results obtained in our center from its implementation in 2013 (n = 65) to the end of the study in 2016 (n = 60). We evaluated the pain at 24 and 48 h after surgery, the time until the first ambulation, the range of flexion and extension at discharge, and length of hospital stay.ResultsThe results obtained at the beginning of the implantation of the Fast-Track protocol in our center and the present ones do not present statistically significant differences. Mean pain at 24 h was 1,65/10 in 2013 and 1,5/10 in 2016, and at 48 h 1,61/10 and 1,58/10 respectively. Most of the patients in both years scored a pain below 4/10 at 24 h and 48 h. Mean time of the first ambulation was 260 min in 2013 and 254 min in 2016 (most of the patients started walking in ≤5 h). Mean flexion at discharge was 90,3° in 2013 and 87,92° in 2016 (most of the patients presented a flexion between 80 and 100°). Mean extension at discharge was 6,95° in 2013 and 8,1° in 2016 (most of the patients presented an extension between 0 and 10°). Mean length of stay was 2,46 days in 2013 and 2,43 days in 2016 (most of the patients had a stay of fewer than 4 days).ConclusionsWhen applying the Fast-Track protocol by a multidisciplinary team in primary knee prosthetic surgery, the clinical results obtained are independent of the experience of this team in the protocol. So, from our experience, we can affirm that the protocol has enough solidity since its beginning and it maintains similar results despite the years of execution.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>30906123</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.020</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-978X
ispartof Journal of orthopaedics, 2019-05, Vol.16 (3), p.201-205
issn 0972-978X
0972-978X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6411603
source Elsevier; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Experience
Fast track
Knee arthroplasty
Multidisciplinary team
Orthopedics
title Results of a fast-track knee arthroplasty according to the experience of a multidisciplinary team
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A09%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20a%20fast-track%20knee%20arthroplasty%20according%20to%20the%20experience%20of%20a%20multidisciplinary%20team&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Pujol,%20Oriol&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=201-205&rft.issn=0972-978X&rft.eissn=0972-978X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2197324137%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4f81d64940c4183c85877f8ec6c3cb2b730b3c0328c28bf598c0319dec8cfc123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2197324137&rft_id=info:pmid/30906123&rfr_iscdi=true