Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Is it truly less invasive?

• Published in: Annals of gastroenterological surgery 2019-03, Vol.3 (2), p.138-145
• Main Authors: Oshikiri, Taro, Takiguchi, Gosuke, Miura, Susumu, Takase, Nobuhisa, Hasegawa, Hiroshi, Yamamoto, Masashi, Kanaji, Shingo, Yamashita, Kimihiro, Matsuda, Yoshiko, Matsuda, Takeru, Nakamura, Tetsu, Suzuki, Satoshi, Kakeji, Yoshihiro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen; Esophageal cancer; Esophagus; Gastrointestinal surgery; Hospitals; Laparoscopy; Lymphatic system; minimally invasive esophagectomy; Morbidity; Mortality; Ostomy; Pneumonia; Review; Robotic surgery; Surgery; thoracoscopic surgery; well‐experienced facilities
• ISSN: 2475-0328; 2475-0328
• DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12224

Esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy remains the mainstay of treatment for localized esophageal cancer. However, it is one of the most invasive procedures with high morbidity. To reduce invasiveness, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), which includes thoracoscopic, laparoscopic, mediastinoscopic, and robotic surgery, is becoming popular worldwide. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position is ergonomic for the surgeon and has better perioperative arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left decubitus position is easy to introduce because it is similar to standard right posterolateral open esophagectomy (OE) in position. It has a relatively short operative time. Laparoscopic approach could potentially have a substantial effect on pneumonia prevention under the condition of thoracotomy. Mediastinoscopic surgery has the potential to reduce pulmonary complications because it can avoid a transthoracic procedure. In robotic surgery, in the future, less recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy will be expected as a result of polyarticular fine maneuvering without human tremors. In studies comparing MIE with OE, mediastinoscopic surgery and robotic surgery are usually not included; these studies show that MIE has a longer operative time and less blood loss than OE. MIE is particularly beneficial in reducing postoperative respiratory complications such as atelectasis, despite no dramatic decrease in pneumonia. Reoperation might occur more frequently with MIE. There is no significant difference in mortality rate between MIE and OE. It is important to recognize that the advantages of MIE, particularly “less invasiveness”, can be of benefit at facilities with experienced medical personnel. We showed that minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is particularly beneficial in reducing postoperative respiratory complications such as atelectasis, despite no dramatic decrease in pneumonia. Re‐operation might occur more frequently with MIE. There is no significant difference in mortality rate between MIE and open esophagectomy. It is important to recognize that the advantages of MIE, particularly “less invasiveness”, can be availed at facilities with experienced medical personnel.