The blue paradox: Preemptive overfishing in marine reserves

• Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2019-03, Vol.116 (12), p.5319-5325
• Main Authors: McDermott, Grant R., Meng, Kyle C., McDonald, Gavin G., Costello, Christopher J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biological Sciences; COLLOQUIUM PAPERS; Color; Conservation; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence; Environmental policy; Fisheries; Fisheries - legislation & jurisprudence; Fishing; Health Resources - legislation & jurisprudence; Marine Biology - legislation & jurisprudence; Nature reserves; Overfishing; Policy; Preempting; Protected areas; Resource conservation; Sackler on Economics, Environment, and Sustainable Development; Social Sciences; Underwater resources
• ISSN: 0027-8424; 1091-6490
• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802862115

Most large-scale conservation policies are anticipated or announced in advance. This risks the possibility of preemptive resource extraction before the conservation intervention goes into force. We use a high-resolution dataset of satellite-based fishing activity to show that anticipation of an impending no-take marine reserve undermines the policy by triggering an unintended race-to-fish. We study one of the world’s largest marine reserves, the Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA), and find that fishers more than doubled their fishing effort once this area was earmarked for eventual protected status. The additional fishing effort resulted in an impoverished starting point for PIPA equivalent to 1.5 y of banned fishing. Extrapolating this behavior globally, we estimate that if other marine reserve announcements were to trigger similar preemptive fishing, this could temporarily increase the share of overextracted fisheries from 65% to 72%. Our findings have implications for general conservation efforts as well as the methods that scientists use to monitor and evaluate policy efficacy.