Loading…
Measuring Abdominal Adipose Tissue: Comparison of Simpler Methods with MRI
Objective: This cross-sectional study compares the relationship of visceral and total abdominal adipose tissue (VAT and TAAT) measurements obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a range of ‘simpler’ techniques suitable for field or bedside use: BMI, waist circumference (WC), bioelectrica...
Saved in:
Published in: | Obesity facts 2011-02, Vol.4 (1), p.9-15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-a428f76ba6b9cc28e7b68e12b7ab56878d4ee9ab5bb538162cb38893a64edfdb3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 15 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Obesity facts |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Browning, Lucy M. Mugridge, Owen Dixon, Adrian K. Aitken, Sri W. Prentice, Andrew M. Jebb, Susan A. |
description | Objective: This cross-sectional study compares the relationship of visceral and total abdominal adipose tissue (VAT and TAAT) measurements obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a range of ‘simpler’ techniques suitable for field or bedside use: BMI, waist circumference (WC), bioelectrical impedance (BIA) devices and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Method: 120 participants were recruited, stratified by gender and BMI (20 men and 20 women within each group: lean, overweight and obese). Measurements included height, weight, WC (at midpoint), DXA L2-L4 fat, and BIA (two whole-body and one abdominal device). MRI was used as the reference. Results: MRI data showed that men have more VAT than women, (mean 147 vs. 93 cm 2 ) despite less TAAT (362 vs. 405 cm 2 ). Correlations of simpler abdominal fat measures showed significantly higher correlations with TAAT than with VAT in men and women. Similarly, trunk and whole-body fat measures were significantly more strongly correlated with TAAT than with VAT. Conclusion: None of the simpler techniques show strong correlations with VAT measured by MRI, but WC, abdominal BIA ‘visceral fat level’ and DXA L2-L4 fat all show similar and strong correlations with TAAT and may be useful in large scale surveys. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000324546 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6450044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>855204532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-a428f76ba6b9cc28e7b68e12b7ab56878d4ee9ab5bb538162cb38893a64edfdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtr3DAUhUVoaB7tIvsQBF2ULibR25osCsOQyYMMA-1kLST7ekapbTmS3ZB_X5dJTApd3QPnu-deDkInlJxTKqcXhBDOhBRqDx1SpdhEEM4_jJrJA3SU0iMhioqMfkQHjPKMKaIO0d0SbOqjbzZ45opQ-8ZWeFb4NiTAa59SD5d4HurWRp9Cg0OJf_q6rSDiJXTbUCT87LstXv64_YT2S1sl-Pw6j9HD4mo9v5ncr65v57P7SS4Y7yZWMF1mylnlpnnONGROaaDMZdZJpTNdCIDpoJ2TXFPFcse1nnKrBBRl4fgx-r7LbXtXQ5FD00VbmTb62sYXE6w3_zqN35pN-G2UkIQIMQR8fQ2I4amH1JnapxyqyjYQ-mS0lIwIydlAftuReQwpRSjHK5SYv9WbsfqBPXv_1ki-dT0Apzvgl40biCMw7n_5r71azHaEaYuS_wF-qZQf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>855204532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Abdominal Adipose Tissue: Comparison of Simpler Methods with MRI</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Browning, Lucy M. ; Mugridge, Owen ; Dixon, Adrian K. ; Aitken, Sri W. ; Prentice, Andrew M. ; Jebb, Susan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Browning, Lucy M. ; Mugridge, Owen ; Dixon, Adrian K. ; Aitken, Sri W. ; Prentice, Andrew M. ; Jebb, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This cross-sectional study compares the relationship of visceral and total abdominal adipose tissue (VAT and TAAT) measurements obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a range of ‘simpler’ techniques suitable for field or bedside use: BMI, waist circumference (WC), bioelectrical impedance (BIA) devices and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Method: 120 participants were recruited, stratified by gender and BMI (20 men and 20 women within each group: lean, overweight and obese). Measurements included height, weight, WC (at midpoint), DXA L2-L4 fat, and BIA (two whole-body and one abdominal device). MRI was used as the reference. Results: MRI data showed that men have more VAT than women, (mean 147 vs. 93 cm 2 ) despite less TAAT (362 vs. 405 cm 2 ). Correlations of simpler abdominal fat measures showed significantly higher correlations with TAAT than with VAT in men and women. Similarly, trunk and whole-body fat measures were significantly more strongly correlated with TAAT than with VAT. Conclusion: None of the simpler techniques show strong correlations with VAT measured by MRI, but WC, abdominal BIA ‘visceral fat level’ and DXA L2-L4 fat all show similar and strong correlations with TAAT and may be useful in large scale surveys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1662-4025</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-4033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-4033</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000324546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21372606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Abdominal Fat - pathology ; Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Body Fat Distribution - methods ; Body Mass Index ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Electric Impedance ; Female ; Humans ; Intra-Abdominal Fat - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity, Abdominal - diagnosis ; Original ; Original Article ; Sex Factors ; Waist Circumference ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Obesity facts, 2011-02, Vol.4 (1), p.9-15</ispartof><rights>2011 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-a428f76ba6b9cc28e7b68e12b7ab56878d4ee9ab5bb538162cb38893a64edfdb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450044/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450044/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21372606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Browning, Lucy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugridge, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Adrian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Sri W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentice, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jebb, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Abdominal Adipose Tissue: Comparison of Simpler Methods with MRI</title><title>Obesity facts</title><addtitle>Obes Facts</addtitle><description>Objective: This cross-sectional study compares the relationship of visceral and total abdominal adipose tissue (VAT and TAAT) measurements obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a range of ‘simpler’ techniques suitable for field or bedside use: BMI, waist circumference (WC), bioelectrical impedance (BIA) devices and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Method: 120 participants were recruited, stratified by gender and BMI (20 men and 20 women within each group: lean, overweight and obese). Measurements included height, weight, WC (at midpoint), DXA L2-L4 fat, and BIA (two whole-body and one abdominal device). MRI was used as the reference. Results: MRI data showed that men have more VAT than women, (mean 147 vs. 93 cm 2 ) despite less TAAT (362 vs. 405 cm 2 ). Correlations of simpler abdominal fat measures showed significantly higher correlations with TAAT than with VAT in men and women. Similarly, trunk and whole-body fat measures were significantly more strongly correlated with TAAT than with VAT. Conclusion: None of the simpler techniques show strong correlations with VAT measured by MRI, but WC, abdominal BIA ‘visceral fat level’ and DXA L2-L4 fat all show similar and strong correlations with TAAT and may be useful in large scale surveys.</description><subject>Abdominal Fat - pathology</subject><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Fat Distribution - methods</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intra-Abdominal Fat - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity, Abdominal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Waist Circumference</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1662-4025</issn><issn>1662-4033</issn><issn>1662-4033</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtr3DAUhUVoaB7tIvsQBF2ULibR25osCsOQyYMMA-1kLST7ekapbTmS3ZB_X5dJTApd3QPnu-deDkInlJxTKqcXhBDOhBRqDx1SpdhEEM4_jJrJA3SU0iMhioqMfkQHjPKMKaIO0d0SbOqjbzZ45opQ-8ZWeFb4NiTAa59SD5d4HurWRp9Cg0OJf_q6rSDiJXTbUCT87LstXv64_YT2S1sl-Pw6j9HD4mo9v5ncr65v57P7SS4Y7yZWMF1mylnlpnnONGROaaDMZdZJpTNdCIDpoJ2TXFPFcse1nnKrBBRl4fgx-r7LbXtXQ5FD00VbmTb62sYXE6w3_zqN35pN-G2UkIQIMQR8fQ2I4amH1JnapxyqyjYQ-mS0lIwIydlAftuReQwpRSjHK5SYv9WbsfqBPXv_1ki-dT0Apzvgl40biCMw7n_5r71azHaEaYuS_wF-qZQf</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Browning, Lucy M.</creator><creator>Mugridge, Owen</creator><creator>Dixon, Adrian K.</creator><creator>Aitken, Sri W.</creator><creator>Prentice, Andrew M.</creator><creator>Jebb, Susan A.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Measuring Abdominal Adipose Tissue: Comparison of Simpler Methods with MRI</title><author>Browning, Lucy M. ; Mugridge, Owen ; Dixon, Adrian K. ; Aitken, Sri W. ; Prentice, Andrew M. ; Jebb, Susan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-a428f76ba6b9cc28e7b68e12b7ab56878d4ee9ab5bb538162cb38893a64edfdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Fat - pathology</topic><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Fat Distribution - methods</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intra-Abdominal Fat - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity, Abdominal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Waist Circumference</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Browning, Lucy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugridge, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Adrian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aitken, Sri W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentice, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jebb, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Obesity facts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Browning, Lucy M.</au><au>Mugridge, Owen</au><au>Dixon, Adrian K.</au><au>Aitken, Sri W.</au><au>Prentice, Andrew M.</au><au>Jebb, Susan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Abdominal Adipose Tissue: Comparison of Simpler Methods with MRI</atitle><jtitle>Obesity facts</jtitle><addtitle>Obes Facts</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>9-15</pages><issn>1662-4025</issn><issn>1662-4033</issn><eissn>1662-4033</eissn><abstract>Objective: This cross-sectional study compares the relationship of visceral and total abdominal adipose tissue (VAT and TAAT) measurements obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a range of ‘simpler’ techniques suitable for field or bedside use: BMI, waist circumference (WC), bioelectrical impedance (BIA) devices and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Method: 120 participants were recruited, stratified by gender and BMI (20 men and 20 women within each group: lean, overweight and obese). Measurements included height, weight, WC (at midpoint), DXA L2-L4 fat, and BIA (two whole-body and one abdominal device). MRI was used as the reference. Results: MRI data showed that men have more VAT than women, (mean 147 vs. 93 cm 2 ) despite less TAAT (362 vs. 405 cm 2 ). Correlations of simpler abdominal fat measures showed significantly higher correlations with TAAT than with VAT in men and women. Similarly, trunk and whole-body fat measures were significantly more strongly correlated with TAAT than with VAT. Conclusion: None of the simpler techniques show strong correlations with VAT measured by MRI, but WC, abdominal BIA ‘visceral fat level’ and DXA L2-L4 fat all show similar and strong correlations with TAAT and may be useful in large scale surveys.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>21372606</pmid><doi>10.1159/000324546</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1662-4025 |
ispartof | Obesity facts, 2011-02, Vol.4 (1), p.9-15 |
issn | 1662-4025 1662-4033 1662-4033 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6450044 |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess) |
subjects | Abdominal Fat - pathology Absorptiometry, Photon Adolescent Adult Aged Body Fat Distribution - methods Body Mass Index Cross-Sectional Studies Electric Impedance Female Humans Intra-Abdominal Fat - pathology Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Obesity, Abdominal - diagnosis Original Original Article Sex Factors Waist Circumference Young Adult |
title | Measuring Abdominal Adipose Tissue: Comparison of Simpler Methods with MRI |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Abdominal%20Adipose%20Tissue:%20Comparison%20of%20Simpler%20Methods%20with%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20facts&rft.au=Browning,%20Lucy%20M.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=9-15&rft.issn=1662-4025&rft.eissn=1662-4033&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000324546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E855204532%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-a428f76ba6b9cc28e7b68e12b7ab56878d4ee9ab5bb538162cb38893a64edfdb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=855204532&rft_id=info:pmid/21372606&rfr_iscdi=true |