Loading…

Transport and Loss of Ring Current Electrons Inside Geosynchronous Orbit During the 17 March 2013 Storm

Ring current electrons (1–100 keV) have received significant attention in recent decades, but many questions regarding their major transport and loss mechanisms remain open. In this study, we use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model the enhancement of phase space dens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2019-02, Vol.124 (2), p.915-933
Main Authors: Aseev, N. A., Shprits, Y. Y., Wang, D., Wygant, J., Drozdov, A. Y., Kellerman, A. C., Reeves, G. D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4838-432316d54c7c60261f5f67335c7e359e2f5f0fe6e0d3a6fe9ab70addcc0a81cd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4838-432316d54c7c60261f5f67335c7e359e2f5f0fe6e0d3a6fe9ab70addcc0a81cd3
container_end_page 933
container_issue 2
container_start_page 915
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 124
creator Aseev, N. A.
Shprits, Y. Y.
Wang, D.
Wygant, J.
Drozdov, A. Y.
Kellerman, A. C.
Reeves, G. D.
description Ring current electrons (1–100 keV) have received significant attention in recent decades, but many questions regarding their major transport and loss mechanisms remain open. In this study, we use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model the enhancement of phase space density that occurred during the 17 March 2013 storm. Our model includes global convection, radial diffusion, and scattering into the Earth's atmosphere driven by whistler‐mode hiss and chorus waves. We study the sensitivity of the model to the boundary conditions, global electric field, the electric field associated with subauroral polarization streams, electron loss rates, and radial diffusion coefficients. The results of the code are almost insensitive to the model parameters above 4.5 RERE, which indicates that the general dynamics of the electrons between 4.5 RE and the geostationary orbit can be explained by global convection. We found that the major discrepancies between the model and data can stem from the inaccurate electric field model and uncertainties in lifetimes. We show that additional mechanisms that are responsible for radial transport are required to explain the dynamics of ≥40‐keV electrons, and the inclusion of the radial diffusion rates that are typically assumed in radiation belt studies leads to a better agreement with the data. The overall effect of subauroral polarization streams on the electron phase space density profiles seems to be smaller than the uncertainties in other input parameters. This study is an initial step toward understanding the dynamics of these particles inside the geostationary orbit. Plain Language Summary The dynamics of the ring current electrons is a competition between loss and transport processes in the Earth's inner magnetosphere. These processes remain poorly understood due to difficulties of in situ particle measurements. Given the scarcity of satellite data, numerical modeling is a powerful approach that allows us to gain a deeper insight into the behavior of the ring current electrons. In this work, we investigate which processes dominate the dynamics of these particles within the geostationary orbit. We use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model electron loss and transport processes during 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm. To understand the significance of the model uncertainty, we run an ensemble of simulations with different model parameters and compare results with the Van Alle
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018JA026031
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6472511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2212722772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4838-432316d54c7c60261f5f67335c7e359e2f5f0fe6e0d3a6fe9ab70addcc0a81cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpjTOy4MKBgD_WH3tBikIJrYIqlXK2HO9s1tXGTm0vKP8eV2mrwgFf7Bk_fj0zL0KvKflICWs_MUL1xZwwSTh9ho4Zle2sbQh7_nDmmhyh05xvSF26pqh4iY44rQEh8hhtrpMNeRdTwTZ0eBVzxrHHVz5s8GJKCULBZyO4kmLI-Dxk3wFeQsz74Iaai1PGl2ntC_4ypbtHZQBMFf5ukxtwLY_jHyWm7Sv0ordjhtP7_QT9_Hp2vfg2W10uzxfz1cw1mutZwxmnshONU07Wtmgveqk4F04BFy2wGpMeJJCOW9lDa9eK2K5zjlhNXcdP0OeD7m5ab6Fztf5kR7NLfmvT3kTrzd83wQ9mE38Z2SgmKK0Cbw8CMRdvsvMF3OBiCHUGhkpOtJIVen__S4q3E-Ritj47GEcboE7EMEaZYkwpVtF3_6A3cUqhzsAw2gqhFddNpT4cKJeqAwn6x4opMXdOm6dOV_zN0y4f4QdfK8APwG8_wv6_YuZieTUXjRKa_wGOPrCX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195587384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transport and Loss of Ring Current Electrons Inside Geosynchronous Orbit During the 17 March 2013 Storm</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Aseev, N. A. ; Shprits, Y. Y. ; Wang, D. ; Wygant, J. ; Drozdov, A. Y. ; Kellerman, A. C. ; Reeves, G. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aseev, N. A. ; Shprits, Y. Y. ; Wang, D. ; Wygant, J. ; Drozdov, A. Y. ; Kellerman, A. C. ; Reeves, G. D. ; Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Ring current electrons (1–100 keV) have received significant attention in recent decades, but many questions regarding their major transport and loss mechanisms remain open. In this study, we use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model the enhancement of phase space density that occurred during the 17 March 2013 storm. Our model includes global convection, radial diffusion, and scattering into the Earth's atmosphere driven by whistler‐mode hiss and chorus waves. We study the sensitivity of the model to the boundary conditions, global electric field, the electric field associated with subauroral polarization streams, electron loss rates, and radial diffusion coefficients. The results of the code are almost insensitive to the model parameters above 4.5 RERE, which indicates that the general dynamics of the electrons between 4.5 RE and the geostationary orbit can be explained by global convection. We found that the major discrepancies between the model and data can stem from the inaccurate electric field model and uncertainties in lifetimes. We show that additional mechanisms that are responsible for radial transport are required to explain the dynamics of ≥40‐keV electrons, and the inclusion of the radial diffusion rates that are typically assumed in radiation belt studies leads to a better agreement with the data. The overall effect of subauroral polarization streams on the electron phase space density profiles seems to be smaller than the uncertainties in other input parameters. This study is an initial step toward understanding the dynamics of these particles inside the geostationary orbit. Plain Language Summary The dynamics of the ring current electrons is a competition between loss and transport processes in the Earth's inner magnetosphere. These processes remain poorly understood due to difficulties of in situ particle measurements. Given the scarcity of satellite data, numerical modeling is a powerful approach that allows us to gain a deeper insight into the behavior of the ring current electrons. In this work, we investigate which processes dominate the dynamics of these particles within the geostationary orbit. We use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model electron loss and transport processes during 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm. To understand the significance of the model uncertainty, we run an ensemble of simulations with different model parameters and compare results with the Van Allen Probe satellite observations. We show that the global convective electric and magnetic fields control the transport of the ring current electrons inside the geostationary orbit. This work is a basis for future studies, which will be extended further away from the Earth and include more comprehensive plasma wave models. Key Points Ring current electron dynamics within geostationary orbit is modeled and the sensitivity of the model to the input parameters is explored Global convective electron transport from geostationary orbit to 4.5 RE can explain Van Allen Probe observations Model results below 4.5 RE are most sensitive to the electric field and electron lifetimes</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JA026031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31008006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS ; Atmospheric models ; Boundary conditions ; Chorus waves ; Computer simulation ; Convection ; Diffusion ; Diffusion coefficient ; Diffusion rate ; Dynamics ; Earth ; Earth atmosphere ; Earth magnetosphere ; Electric fields ; Electron radiation ; electron transport ; ensemble modeling ; Geomagnetic storms ; Geomagnetism ; Geosynchronous orbits ; heliospheric and magnetospheric physics ; inner magnetosphere ; Ionosphere ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic Storms ; Magnetic Storms and Substorms ; Magnetosphere ; Magnetosphere: Inner ; magnetospheric convection ; Magnetospheric Physics ; Mathematical models ; Natural Hazards ; Numerical Modeling ; Orbital mechanics ; Parameter uncertainty ; Particle physics ; Plasma Convection ; Plasma waves ; Polarization ; Radiation ; Ring Current ; ring current electrons ; Ring currents ; Satellite data ; Satellite observation ; Space density ; Space Weather ; Storms ; Streams ; Transport processes ; Wave models ; wave-particle interactions</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2019-02, Vol.124 (2), p.915-933</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4838-432316d54c7c60261f5f67335c7e359e2f5f0fe6e0d3a6fe9ab70addcc0a81cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4838-432316d54c7c60261f5f67335c7e359e2f5f0fe6e0d3a6fe9ab70addcc0a81cd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0564-0440 ; 0000-0002-7985-8098 ; 0000-0002-4213-4037 ; 0000-0002-5334-2026 ; 0000-0002-9625-0834 ; 0000-0002-7112-2780 ; 0000-0002-2315-936X ; 0000000242134037 ; 0000000205640440 ; 0000000279858098 ; 0000000271122780 ; 000000022315936X ; 0000000253342026 ; 0000000296250834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1630876$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aseev, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shprits, Y. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wygant, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdov, A. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellerman, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Transport and Loss of Ring Current Electrons Inside Geosynchronous Orbit During the 17 March 2013 Storm</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><addtitle>J Geophys Res Space Phys</addtitle><description>Ring current electrons (1–100 keV) have received significant attention in recent decades, but many questions regarding their major transport and loss mechanisms remain open. In this study, we use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model the enhancement of phase space density that occurred during the 17 March 2013 storm. Our model includes global convection, radial diffusion, and scattering into the Earth's atmosphere driven by whistler‐mode hiss and chorus waves. We study the sensitivity of the model to the boundary conditions, global electric field, the electric field associated with subauroral polarization streams, electron loss rates, and radial diffusion coefficients. The results of the code are almost insensitive to the model parameters above 4.5 RERE, which indicates that the general dynamics of the electrons between 4.5 RE and the geostationary orbit can be explained by global convection. We found that the major discrepancies between the model and data can stem from the inaccurate electric field model and uncertainties in lifetimes. We show that additional mechanisms that are responsible for radial transport are required to explain the dynamics of ≥40‐keV electrons, and the inclusion of the radial diffusion rates that are typically assumed in radiation belt studies leads to a better agreement with the data. The overall effect of subauroral polarization streams on the electron phase space density profiles seems to be smaller than the uncertainties in other input parameters. This study is an initial step toward understanding the dynamics of these particles inside the geostationary orbit. Plain Language Summary The dynamics of the ring current electrons is a competition between loss and transport processes in the Earth's inner magnetosphere. These processes remain poorly understood due to difficulties of in situ particle measurements. Given the scarcity of satellite data, numerical modeling is a powerful approach that allows us to gain a deeper insight into the behavior of the ring current electrons. In this work, we investigate which processes dominate the dynamics of these particles within the geostationary orbit. We use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model electron loss and transport processes during 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm. To understand the significance of the model uncertainty, we run an ensemble of simulations with different model parameters and compare results with the Van Allen Probe satellite observations. We show that the global convective electric and magnetic fields control the transport of the ring current electrons inside the geostationary orbit. This work is a basis for future studies, which will be extended further away from the Earth and include more comprehensive plasma wave models. Key Points Ring current electron dynamics within geostationary orbit is modeled and the sensitivity of the model to the input parameters is explored Global convective electron transport from geostationary orbit to 4.5 RE can explain Van Allen Probe observations Model results below 4.5 RE are most sensitive to the electric field and electron lifetimes</description><subject>ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Chorus waves</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diffusion rate</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth atmosphere</subject><subject>Earth magnetosphere</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electron radiation</subject><subject>electron transport</subject><subject>ensemble modeling</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Geosynchronous orbits</subject><subject>heliospheric and magnetospheric physics</subject><subject>inner magnetosphere</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic Storms</subject><subject>Magnetic Storms and Substorms</subject><subject>Magnetosphere</subject><subject>Magnetosphere: Inner</subject><subject>magnetospheric convection</subject><subject>Magnetospheric Physics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Numerical Modeling</subject><subject>Orbital mechanics</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Particle physics</subject><subject>Plasma Convection</subject><subject>Plasma waves</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Ring Current</subject><subject>ring current electrons</subject><subject>Ring currents</subject><subject>Satellite data</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Space density</subject><subject>Space Weather</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Transport processes</subject><subject>Wave models</subject><subject>wave-particle interactions</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EolXpjTOy4MKBgD_WH3tBikIJrYIqlXK2HO9s1tXGTm0vKP8eV2mrwgFf7Bk_fj0zL0KvKflICWs_MUL1xZwwSTh9ho4Zle2sbQh7_nDmmhyh05xvSF26pqh4iY44rQEh8hhtrpMNeRdTwTZ0eBVzxrHHVz5s8GJKCULBZyO4kmLI-Dxk3wFeQsz74Iaai1PGl2ntC_4ypbtHZQBMFf5ukxtwLY_jHyWm7Sv0ordjhtP7_QT9_Hp2vfg2W10uzxfz1cw1mutZwxmnshONU07Wtmgveqk4F04BFy2wGpMeJJCOW9lDa9eK2K5zjlhNXcdP0OeD7m5ab6Fztf5kR7NLfmvT3kTrzd83wQ9mE38Z2SgmKK0Cbw8CMRdvsvMF3OBiCHUGhkpOtJIVen__S4q3E-Ritj47GEcboE7EMEaZYkwpVtF3_6A3cUqhzsAw2gqhFddNpT4cKJeqAwn6x4opMXdOm6dOV_zN0y4f4QdfK8APwG8_wv6_YuZieTUXjRKa_wGOPrCX</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Aseev, N. A.</creator><creator>Shprits, Y. Y.</creator><creator>Wang, D.</creator><creator>Wygant, J.</creator><creator>Drozdov, A. Y.</creator><creator>Kellerman, A. C.</creator><creator>Reeves, G. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0564-0440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-8098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-4037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5334-2026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-0834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-2780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2315-936X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000242134037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000205640440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000279858098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000271122780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000022315936X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000253342026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000296250834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Transport and Loss of Ring Current Electrons Inside Geosynchronous Orbit During the 17 March 2013 Storm</title><author>Aseev, N. A. ; Shprits, Y. Y. ; Wang, D. ; Wygant, J. ; Drozdov, A. Y. ; Kellerman, A. C. ; Reeves, G. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4838-432316d54c7c60261f5f67335c7e359e2f5f0fe6e0d3a6fe9ab70addcc0a81cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Chorus waves</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diffusion rate</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth atmosphere</topic><topic>Earth magnetosphere</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electron radiation</topic><topic>electron transport</topic><topic>ensemble modeling</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Geosynchronous orbits</topic><topic>heliospheric and magnetospheric physics</topic><topic>inner magnetosphere</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic Storms</topic><topic>Magnetic Storms and Substorms</topic><topic>Magnetosphere</topic><topic>Magnetosphere: Inner</topic><topic>magnetospheric convection</topic><topic>Magnetospheric Physics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Numerical Modeling</topic><topic>Orbital mechanics</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Particle physics</topic><topic>Plasma Convection</topic><topic>Plasma waves</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Ring Current</topic><topic>ring current electrons</topic><topic>Ring currents</topic><topic>Satellite data</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Space density</topic><topic>Space Weather</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Transport processes</topic><topic>Wave models</topic><topic>wave-particle interactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aseev, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shprits, Y. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wygant, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drozdov, A. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellerman, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Free Backfiles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aseev, N. A.</au><au>Shprits, Y. Y.</au><au>Wang, D.</au><au>Wygant, J.</au><au>Drozdov, A. Y.</au><au>Kellerman, A. C.</au><au>Reeves, G. D.</au><aucorp>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transport and Loss of Ring Current Electrons Inside Geosynchronous Orbit During the 17 March 2013 Storm</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Geophys Res Space Phys</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>915</spage><epage>933</epage><pages>915-933</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Ring current electrons (1–100 keV) have received significant attention in recent decades, but many questions regarding their major transport and loss mechanisms remain open. In this study, we use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model the enhancement of phase space density that occurred during the 17 March 2013 storm. Our model includes global convection, radial diffusion, and scattering into the Earth's atmosphere driven by whistler‐mode hiss and chorus waves. We study the sensitivity of the model to the boundary conditions, global electric field, the electric field associated with subauroral polarization streams, electron loss rates, and radial diffusion coefficients. The results of the code are almost insensitive to the model parameters above 4.5 RERE, which indicates that the general dynamics of the electrons between 4.5 RE and the geostationary orbit can be explained by global convection. We found that the major discrepancies between the model and data can stem from the inaccurate electric field model and uncertainties in lifetimes. We show that additional mechanisms that are responsible for radial transport are required to explain the dynamics of ≥40‐keV electrons, and the inclusion of the radial diffusion rates that are typically assumed in radiation belt studies leads to a better agreement with the data. The overall effect of subauroral polarization streams on the electron phase space density profiles seems to be smaller than the uncertainties in other input parameters. This study is an initial step toward understanding the dynamics of these particles inside the geostationary orbit. Plain Language Summary The dynamics of the ring current electrons is a competition between loss and transport processes in the Earth's inner magnetosphere. These processes remain poorly understood due to difficulties of in situ particle measurements. Given the scarcity of satellite data, numerical modeling is a powerful approach that allows us to gain a deeper insight into the behavior of the ring current electrons. In this work, we investigate which processes dominate the dynamics of these particles within the geostationary orbit. We use the four‐dimensional Versatile Electron Radiation Belt code to model electron loss and transport processes during 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm. To understand the significance of the model uncertainty, we run an ensemble of simulations with different model parameters and compare results with the Van Allen Probe satellite observations. We show that the global convective electric and magnetic fields control the transport of the ring current electrons inside the geostationary orbit. This work is a basis for future studies, which will be extended further away from the Earth and include more comprehensive plasma wave models. Key Points Ring current electron dynamics within geostationary orbit is modeled and the sensitivity of the model to the input parameters is explored Global convective electron transport from geostationary orbit to 4.5 RE can explain Van Allen Probe observations Model results below 4.5 RE are most sensitive to the electric field and electron lifetimes</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31008006</pmid><doi>10.1029/2018JA026031</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0564-0440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-8098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-4037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5334-2026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-0834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-2780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2315-936X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000242134037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000205640440</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000279858098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000271122780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000022315936X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000253342026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000296250834</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2019-02, Vol.124 (2), p.915-933
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6472511
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS
Atmospheric models
Boundary conditions
Chorus waves
Computer simulation
Convection
Diffusion
Diffusion coefficient
Diffusion rate
Dynamics
Earth
Earth atmosphere
Earth magnetosphere
Electric fields
Electron radiation
electron transport
ensemble modeling
Geomagnetic storms
Geomagnetism
Geosynchronous orbits
heliospheric and magnetospheric physics
inner magnetosphere
Ionosphere
Magnetic fields
Magnetic Storms
Magnetic Storms and Substorms
Magnetosphere
Magnetosphere: Inner
magnetospheric convection
Magnetospheric Physics
Mathematical models
Natural Hazards
Numerical Modeling
Orbital mechanics
Parameter uncertainty
Particle physics
Plasma Convection
Plasma waves
Polarization
Radiation
Ring Current
ring current electrons
Ring currents
Satellite data
Satellite observation
Space density
Space Weather
Storms
Streams
Transport processes
Wave models
wave-particle interactions
title Transport and Loss of Ring Current Electrons Inside Geosynchronous Orbit During the 17 March 2013 Storm
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A57%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transport%20and%20Loss%20of%20Ring%20Current%20Electrons%20Inside%20Geosynchronous%20Orbit%20During%20the%2017%20March%202013%20Storm&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Aseev,%20N.%20A.&rft.aucorp=Los%20Alamos%20National%20Lab.%20(LANL),%20Los%20Alamos,%20NM%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=915&rft.epage=933&rft.pages=915-933&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JA026031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2212722772%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4838-432316d54c7c60261f5f67335c7e359e2f5f0fe6e0d3a6fe9ab70addcc0a81cd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195587384&rft_id=info:pmid/31008006&rfr_iscdi=true