Loading…

Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Certification in New York City: Intra-Agency Guideline Compliance and Variables that May Influence Death Certification

Introduction Differences in certification of similar sudden infant deaths exists among forensic pathologists. This study sought to measure adherence to intra-agency guidelines for infant death certification in one jurisdiction and describe variables that may be associated with the differentiation of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Academic forensic pathology 2017-12, Vol.7 (4), p.536-550
Main Authors: Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A., Regensburg, Margaret, Bao, Ruijun
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3216-39ac6175f01e6ee735731d756fdebccd28dd73e2d6a7de68570045abfe88749b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3216-39ac6175f01e6ee735731d756fdebccd28dd73e2d6a7de68570045abfe88749b3
container_end_page 550
container_issue 4
container_start_page 536
container_title Academic forensic pathology
container_volume 7
creator Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A.
Regensburg, Margaret
Bao, Ruijun
description Introduction Differences in certification of similar sudden infant deaths exists among forensic pathologists. This study sought to measure adherence to intra-agency guidelines for infant death certification in one jurisdiction and describe variables that may be associated with the differentiation of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), asphyxia, and undetermined death certifications. Methods A retrospective study of deaths at the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner identified 427 sudden infant deaths with investigation and autopsy whose cause of death was ruled SIDS, asphyxia, or undetermined. Cases were reviewed for number and types of risk factors for asphyxia, demonstrable evidence of asphyxia, potential competing causes of death, and a doll reenactment. Descriptive and statistical analysis was performed. Results Of 427 deaths, the causes of 100 deaths (23.4%) were ruled asphyxia; 43 (10.0%) SIDS; and 284 (66.5%) undetermined. Forensic pathologists conformed to agency guidelines in 406 deaths (95.1%). Three or more risk factors for asphyxia were found in 328 deaths (76.8%). Demonstrable evidence of asphyxia (40.7%) was most associated with a certification of asphyxia. A potential competing cause of death (20%) was most associated with undetermined. A doll reenactment had little association with certification type. Discussion Guidelines in one agency were effective at limiting incorrect SIDS diagnoses. The interpretation of risk factors can be subjective. Diagnostic overlap occurred in deaths certified differently as SIDS, asphyxia, and undetermined, despite similar findings. Elimination of SIDS as a certification option and better guidelines that help differentiate asphyxia and undetermined deaths are recommended for improved infant death certification.
doi_str_mv 10.23907/2017.046
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6474437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.23907_2017.046</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2250619093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3216-39ac6175f01e6ee735731d756fdebccd28dd73e2d6a7de68570045abfe88749b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1u1DAUhS0EolXpghdAXiFYpPgnsRMWSFUKpVKBBRSJleXYNzMuGXuwncI8SN-3HqZURerd-F750znXPgg9p-SI8Y7IN4xQeURq8Qjt0441FReMPr7X76HDlC5JqZYQ0TVP0R6nrC5zs4-uv87WgscXHv6swWSw-MyP2md8AjovcQ8xu9EZnV3w2Hn8GX7jHyH-xL3Lm7cFzlFXxwvwZoNPZ2dhch5wH1bryWlvAGtv8XcdnR4mSDgvdcaf9GbrMs2wBR4weoaejHpKcHh7HqCLD--_9R-r8y-nZ_3xeWU4o6LinTaCymYkFASA5I3k1MpGjBYGYyxrrZUcmBVaWhBtIwmpGz2M0Lay7gZ-gN7tdNfzsAJrYPuaSa2jW-m4UUE79f-Nd0u1CFdK1LKuuSwCr24FYvg1Q8pq5ZKBadIewpwUYw0RtCMdL-jrHWpiSCnCeGdDifqbpNomqUqShX1xf6878l9uBXi5A5JegLoMc_Tlnx5QugG_xKZT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250619093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Certification in New York City: Intra-Agency Guideline Compliance and Variables that May Influence Death Certification</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A. ; Regensburg, Margaret ; Bao, Ruijun</creator><creatorcontrib>Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A. ; Regensburg, Margaret ; Bao, Ruijun</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Differences in certification of similar sudden infant deaths exists among forensic pathologists. This study sought to measure adherence to intra-agency guidelines for infant death certification in one jurisdiction and describe variables that may be associated with the differentiation of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), asphyxia, and undetermined death certifications. Methods A retrospective study of deaths at the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner identified 427 sudden infant deaths with investigation and autopsy whose cause of death was ruled SIDS, asphyxia, or undetermined. Cases were reviewed for number and types of risk factors for asphyxia, demonstrable evidence of asphyxia, potential competing causes of death, and a doll reenactment. Descriptive and statistical analysis was performed. Results Of 427 deaths, the causes of 100 deaths (23.4%) were ruled asphyxia; 43 (10.0%) SIDS; and 284 (66.5%) undetermined. Forensic pathologists conformed to agency guidelines in 406 deaths (95.1%). Three or more risk factors for asphyxia were found in 328 deaths (76.8%). Demonstrable evidence of asphyxia (40.7%) was most associated with a certification of asphyxia. A potential competing cause of death (20%) was most associated with undetermined. A doll reenactment had little association with certification type. Discussion Guidelines in one agency were effective at limiting incorrect SIDS diagnoses. The interpretation of risk factors can be subjective. Diagnostic overlap occurred in deaths certified differently as SIDS, asphyxia, and undetermined, despite similar findings. Elimination of SIDS as a certification option and better guidelines that help differentiate asphyxia and undetermined deaths are recommended for improved infant death certification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1925-3621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-3621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23907/2017.046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31240005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Academic forensic pathology, 2017-12, Vol.7 (4), p.536-550</ispartof><rights>2017 Academic Forensic Pathology International</rights><rights>2017 Academic Forensic Pathology International 2017 Academic Forensic Pathology International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3216-39ac6175f01e6ee735731d756fdebccd28dd73e2d6a7de68570045abfe88749b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3216-39ac6175f01e6ee735731d756fdebccd28dd73e2d6a7de68570045abfe88749b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474437/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474437/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,79135</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31240005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regensburg, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Ruijun</creatorcontrib><title>Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Certification in New York City: Intra-Agency Guideline Compliance and Variables that May Influence Death Certification</title><title>Academic forensic pathology</title><addtitle>Acad Forensic Pathol</addtitle><description>Introduction Differences in certification of similar sudden infant deaths exists among forensic pathologists. This study sought to measure adherence to intra-agency guidelines for infant death certification in one jurisdiction and describe variables that may be associated with the differentiation of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), asphyxia, and undetermined death certifications. Methods A retrospective study of deaths at the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner identified 427 sudden infant deaths with investigation and autopsy whose cause of death was ruled SIDS, asphyxia, or undetermined. Cases were reviewed for number and types of risk factors for asphyxia, demonstrable evidence of asphyxia, potential competing causes of death, and a doll reenactment. Descriptive and statistical analysis was performed. Results Of 427 deaths, the causes of 100 deaths (23.4%) were ruled asphyxia; 43 (10.0%) SIDS; and 284 (66.5%) undetermined. Forensic pathologists conformed to agency guidelines in 406 deaths (95.1%). Three or more risk factors for asphyxia were found in 328 deaths (76.8%). Demonstrable evidence of asphyxia (40.7%) was most associated with a certification of asphyxia. A potential competing cause of death (20%) was most associated with undetermined. A doll reenactment had little association with certification type. Discussion Guidelines in one agency were effective at limiting incorrect SIDS diagnoses. The interpretation of risk factors can be subjective. Diagnostic overlap occurred in deaths certified differently as SIDS, asphyxia, and undetermined, despite similar findings. Elimination of SIDS as a certification option and better guidelines that help differentiate asphyxia and undetermined deaths are recommended for improved infant death certification.</description><issn>1925-3621</issn><issn>1925-3621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1u1DAUhS0EolXpghdAXiFYpPgnsRMWSFUKpVKBBRSJleXYNzMuGXuwncI8SN-3HqZURerd-F750znXPgg9p-SI8Y7IN4xQeURq8Qjt0441FReMPr7X76HDlC5JqZYQ0TVP0R6nrC5zs4-uv87WgscXHv6swWSw-MyP2md8AjovcQ8xu9EZnV3w2Hn8GX7jHyH-xL3Lm7cFzlFXxwvwZoNPZ2dhch5wH1bryWlvAGtv8XcdnR4mSDgvdcaf9GbrMs2wBR4weoaejHpKcHh7HqCLD--_9R-r8y-nZ_3xeWU4o6LinTaCymYkFASA5I3k1MpGjBYGYyxrrZUcmBVaWhBtIwmpGz2M0Lay7gZ-gN7tdNfzsAJrYPuaSa2jW-m4UUE79f-Nd0u1CFdK1LKuuSwCr24FYvg1Q8pq5ZKBadIewpwUYw0RtCMdL-jrHWpiSCnCeGdDifqbpNomqUqShX1xf6878l9uBXi5A5JegLoMc_Tlnx5QugG_xKZT</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A.</creator><creator>Regensburg, Margaret</creator><creator>Bao, Ruijun</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Certification in New York City: Intra-Agency Guideline Compliance and Variables that May Influence Death Certification</title><author>Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A. ; Regensburg, Margaret ; Bao, Ruijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3216-39ac6175f01e6ee735731d756fdebccd28dd73e2d6a7de68570045abfe88749b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regensburg, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Ruijun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic forensic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pasquale-Styles, Melissa A.</au><au>Regensburg, Margaret</au><au>Bao, Ruijun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Certification in New York City: Intra-Agency Guideline Compliance and Variables that May Influence Death Certification</atitle><jtitle>Academic forensic pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Forensic Pathol</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>536-550</pages><issn>1925-3621</issn><eissn>1925-3621</eissn><abstract>Introduction Differences in certification of similar sudden infant deaths exists among forensic pathologists. This study sought to measure adherence to intra-agency guidelines for infant death certification in one jurisdiction and describe variables that may be associated with the differentiation of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), asphyxia, and undetermined death certifications. Methods A retrospective study of deaths at the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner identified 427 sudden infant deaths with investigation and autopsy whose cause of death was ruled SIDS, asphyxia, or undetermined. Cases were reviewed for number and types of risk factors for asphyxia, demonstrable evidence of asphyxia, potential competing causes of death, and a doll reenactment. Descriptive and statistical analysis was performed. Results Of 427 deaths, the causes of 100 deaths (23.4%) were ruled asphyxia; 43 (10.0%) SIDS; and 284 (66.5%) undetermined. Forensic pathologists conformed to agency guidelines in 406 deaths (95.1%). Three or more risk factors for asphyxia were found in 328 deaths (76.8%). Demonstrable evidence of asphyxia (40.7%) was most associated with a certification of asphyxia. A potential competing cause of death (20%) was most associated with undetermined. A doll reenactment had little association with certification type. Discussion Guidelines in one agency were effective at limiting incorrect SIDS diagnoses. The interpretation of risk factors can be subjective. Diagnostic overlap occurred in deaths certified differently as SIDS, asphyxia, and undetermined, despite similar findings. Elimination of SIDS as a certification option and better guidelines that help differentiate asphyxia and undetermined deaths are recommended for improved infant death certification.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31240005</pmid><doi>10.23907/2017.046</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1925-3621
ispartof Academic forensic pathology, 2017-12, Vol.7 (4), p.536-550
issn 1925-3621
1925-3621
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6474437
source PubMed Central; SAGE
title Sudden Unexpected Infant Death Certification in New York City: Intra-Agency Guideline Compliance and Variables that May Influence Death Certification
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sudden%20Unexpected%20Infant%20Death%20Certification%20in%20New%20York%20City:%20Intra-Agency%20Guideline%20Compliance%20and%20Variables%20that%20May%20Influence%20Death%20Certification&rft.jtitle=Academic%20forensic%20pathology&rft.au=Pasquale-Styles,%20Melissa%20A.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=536-550&rft.issn=1925-3621&rft.eissn=1925-3621&rft_id=info:doi/10.23907/2017.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2250619093%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3216-39ac6175f01e6ee735731d756fdebccd28dd73e2d6a7de68570045abfe88749b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250619093&rft_id=info:pmid/31240005&rft_sage_id=10.23907_2017.046&rfr_iscdi=true