Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science

In November of 2017, an interdisciplinary panel discussed the complexities of gene drive applications as part of the third Sackler Colloquium on “The Science of Science Communication.” The panel brought together a social scientist, life scientist, and journalist to discuss the issue from each of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2019-04, Vol.116 (16), p.7692-7697
Main Authors: Brossard, Dominique, Belluck, Pam, Gould, Fred, Wirz, Christopher D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arthur M. Sackler on the Science of Science Communication III
Biological Sciences
COLLOQUIUM PAPERS
Communication
Decision Making
Gene Drive Technology
Humans
Pest control
Pests
Public Opinion
Public participation
Risk assessment
Science
Scientists
Social Sciences
Technology assessment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In November of 2017, an interdisciplinary panel discussed the complexities of gene drive applications as part of the third Sackler Colloquium on “The Science of Science Communication.” The panel brought together a social scientist, life scientist, and journalist to discuss the issue from each of their unique perspectives. This paper builds on the ideas and conversations from the session to provide a more nuanced discussion about the context surrounding responsible communication and decision-making for cases of post-normal science. Deciding to use gene drives to control and suppress pests will involve more than a technical assessment of the risks involved, and responsible decision-making regarding their use will require concerted efforts from multiple actors. We provide a review of gene drives and their potential applications, as well as the role of journalists in communicating the extent of uncertainties around specific projects. We also discuss the roles of public opinion and online environments in public engagement with scientific processes. We conclude with specific recommendations about how to address current challenges and foster more effective communication and decision-making for complex, post-normal issues, such as gene drives.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1805874115