Loading…

Effect of histological subtype and treatment modalities on T1–2 N0–1 small cell lung cancer: A population‐based study

Background Combined small cell lung cancer (C‐SCLC) is rare and its clinical features, appropriate treatment, and prognosis are poorly understood. Reports conflict over the prognosis of C‐SCLCs compared to pure small cell lung cancer. Methods The records of patients diagnosed with primary SCLC from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thoracic cancer 2019-05, Vol.10 (5), p.1229-1240
Main Authors: Moon, Seok‐whan, Seo, Jong‐hee, Jeon, Hyun‐woo, Moon, Mi Hyoung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4673-24b2231bec1003385b1372c3f005b5d4456a37e645697b1995941c0345544ab23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4673-24b2231bec1003385b1372c3f005b5d4456a37e645697b1995941c0345544ab23
container_end_page 1240
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1229
container_title Thoracic cancer
container_volume 10
creator Moon, Seok‐whan
Seo, Jong‐hee
Jeon, Hyun‐woo
Moon, Mi Hyoung
description Background Combined small cell lung cancer (C‐SCLC) is rare and its clinical features, appropriate treatment, and prognosis are poorly understood. Reports conflict over the prognosis of C‐SCLCs compared to pure small cell lung cancer. Methods The records of patients diagnosed with primary SCLC from 1988 to 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The general features of C‐SCLCs were compared to those of SCLCs. T1–2 N0–1 data was extracted and the effects of the histological subtype, treatment modality, and other prognostic factors on lung cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was analyzed in a 3:1 matched dataset. Analysis was performed using the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system and previous staging systems adjunctively. Results C‐SCLCs comprised 1.5% of all SCLCs (1486/98 667); 184 cases of C‐SCLCs and 2681 cases of non‐combined SCLCs (NC‐SCLCs) were included in this study. C‐SCLCs were more likely to be of a higher grade and to occur in the upper lobe than NC‐SCLCs. Before matching, C‐SCLCs showed better CSS (hazard ratio 0.69; P < 0.001). However, stratified Cox proportional hazards analysis in the matched dataset revealed that only treatment modality and age at diagnosis were associated with CSS; the histological subtype had no effect on survival. Of all treatment modalities, surgery with chemoradiation showed the best CSS in T1–2 N0–1 SCLC. Conclusion In early SCLC, surgery with chemoradiation shows the best CSS. C‐SCLC patients might benefit more from multimodal treatments, including surgery, than SCLC patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1759-7714.13073
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6501031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210956322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4673-24b2231bec1003385b1372c3f005b5d4456a37e645697b1995941c0345544ab23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFDEYxgdRbKk9e5OAFy_b5u9k40FYllqFopf1HJJMZpuSScYkU1m89CMI_Yb9JGbcuqgX30PekPzeJ3l4muYlgmeo1jniTCw4R_QMEcjJk-b4cPL0sIftUXOa8w2sRZYCYva8OSJQCCIgOm6-X_S9NQXEHly7XKKPW2eUB3nSZTdaoEIHSrKqDDYUMMROeVeczSAGsEEPd_cYfIK1IZAH5T0wti5-CltgVDA2vQUrMMZx8qq4GB7ufmiVbQdymbrdi-ZZr3y2p4_9pPny_mKz_rC4-nz5cb26WhjacrLAVGNMkLYGVQtkyTQiHBvSQ8g06yhlrSLctrULrpEQTFBkIKGMUao0JifNu73uOOnBdqY6ScrLMblBpZ2Mysm_b4K7ltt4K1sGESSoCrx5FEjx62RzkYPLs1MVbJyyxBhBwVqC57de_4PexCmFaq9SAnJKl4hX6nxPmRRzTrY_fAZBOWcr5_TknKT8lW2dePWnhwP_O8kKsD3wzXm7-5-e3KxXe-GfQ-6vWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290744817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of histological subtype and treatment modalities on T1–2 N0–1 small cell lung cancer: A population‐based study</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Moon, Seok‐whan ; Seo, Jong‐hee ; Jeon, Hyun‐woo ; Moon, Mi Hyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Moon, Seok‐whan ; Seo, Jong‐hee ; Jeon, Hyun‐woo ; Moon, Mi Hyoung</creatorcontrib><description>Background Combined small cell lung cancer (C‐SCLC) is rare and its clinical features, appropriate treatment, and prognosis are poorly understood. Reports conflict over the prognosis of C‐SCLCs compared to pure small cell lung cancer. Methods The records of patients diagnosed with primary SCLC from 1988 to 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The general features of C‐SCLCs were compared to those of SCLCs. T1–2 N0–1 data was extracted and the effects of the histological subtype, treatment modality, and other prognostic factors on lung cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was analyzed in a 3:1 matched dataset. Analysis was performed using the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system and previous staging systems adjunctively. Results C‐SCLCs comprised 1.5% of all SCLCs (1486/98 667); 184 cases of C‐SCLCs and 2681 cases of non‐combined SCLCs (NC‐SCLCs) were included in this study. C‐SCLCs were more likely to be of a higher grade and to occur in the upper lobe than NC‐SCLCs. Before matching, C‐SCLCs showed better CSS (hazard ratio 0.69; P &lt; 0.001). However, stratified Cox proportional hazards analysis in the matched dataset revealed that only treatment modality and age at diagnosis were associated with CSS; the histological subtype had no effect on survival. Of all treatment modalities, surgery with chemoradiation showed the best CSS in T1–2 N0–1 SCLC. Conclusion In early SCLC, surgery with chemoradiation shows the best CSS. C‐SCLC patients might benefit more from multimodal treatments, including surgery, than SCLC patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-7706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13073</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30993901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Combined small cell lung cancer ; Datasets ; Disease ; Epidemiology ; Lung cancer ; Medical prognosis ; Medical screening ; Original ; Patients ; Population-based studies ; SEER ; small cell lung cancer ; Surgery ; Surveillance ; survival analysis ; Thoracic surgery ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Thoracic cancer, 2019-05, Vol.10 (5), p.1229-1240</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4673-24b2231bec1003385b1372c3f005b5d4456a37e645697b1995941c0345544ab23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4673-24b2231bec1003385b1372c3f005b5d4456a37e645697b1995941c0345544ab23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2799-4570</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290744817/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2290744817?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11561,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,46051,46475,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moon, Seok‐whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jong‐hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Hyun‐woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Mi Hyoung</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of histological subtype and treatment modalities on T1–2 N0–1 small cell lung cancer: A population‐based study</title><title>Thoracic cancer</title><addtitle>Thorac Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Combined small cell lung cancer (C‐SCLC) is rare and its clinical features, appropriate treatment, and prognosis are poorly understood. Reports conflict over the prognosis of C‐SCLCs compared to pure small cell lung cancer. Methods The records of patients diagnosed with primary SCLC from 1988 to 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The general features of C‐SCLCs were compared to those of SCLCs. T1–2 N0–1 data was extracted and the effects of the histological subtype, treatment modality, and other prognostic factors on lung cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was analyzed in a 3:1 matched dataset. Analysis was performed using the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system and previous staging systems adjunctively. Results C‐SCLCs comprised 1.5% of all SCLCs (1486/98 667); 184 cases of C‐SCLCs and 2681 cases of non‐combined SCLCs (NC‐SCLCs) were included in this study. C‐SCLCs were more likely to be of a higher grade and to occur in the upper lobe than NC‐SCLCs. Before matching, C‐SCLCs showed better CSS (hazard ratio 0.69; P &lt; 0.001). However, stratified Cox proportional hazards analysis in the matched dataset revealed that only treatment modality and age at diagnosis were associated with CSS; the histological subtype had no effect on survival. Of all treatment modalities, surgery with chemoradiation showed the best CSS in T1–2 N0–1 SCLC. Conclusion In early SCLC, surgery with chemoradiation shows the best CSS. C‐SCLC patients might benefit more from multimodal treatments, including surgery, than SCLC patients.</description><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Combined small cell lung cancer</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>SEER</subject><subject>small cell lung cancer</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>survival analysis</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1759-7706</issn><issn>1759-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFDEYxgdRbKk9e5OAFy_b5u9k40FYllqFopf1HJJMZpuSScYkU1m89CMI_Yb9JGbcuqgX30PekPzeJ3l4muYlgmeo1jniTCw4R_QMEcjJk-b4cPL0sIftUXOa8w2sRZYCYva8OSJQCCIgOm6-X_S9NQXEHly7XKKPW2eUB3nSZTdaoEIHSrKqDDYUMMROeVeczSAGsEEPd_cYfIK1IZAH5T0wti5-CltgVDA2vQUrMMZx8qq4GB7ufmiVbQdymbrdi-ZZr3y2p4_9pPny_mKz_rC4-nz5cb26WhjacrLAVGNMkLYGVQtkyTQiHBvSQ8g06yhlrSLctrULrpEQTFBkIKGMUao0JifNu73uOOnBdqY6ScrLMblBpZ2Mysm_b4K7ltt4K1sGESSoCrx5FEjx62RzkYPLs1MVbJyyxBhBwVqC57de_4PexCmFaq9SAnJKl4hX6nxPmRRzTrY_fAZBOWcr5_TknKT8lW2dePWnhwP_O8kKsD3wzXm7-5-e3KxXe-GfQ-6vWw</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Moon, Seok‐whan</creator><creator>Seo, Jong‐hee</creator><creator>Jeon, Hyun‐woo</creator><creator>Moon, Mi Hyoung</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-4570</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Effect of histological subtype and treatment modalities on T1–2 N0–1 small cell lung cancer: A population‐based study</title><author>Moon, Seok‐whan ; Seo, Jong‐hee ; Jeon, Hyun‐woo ; Moon, Mi Hyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4673-24b2231bec1003385b1372c3f005b5d4456a37e645697b1995941c0345544ab23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Combined small cell lung cancer</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>SEER</topic><topic>small cell lung cancer</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>survival analysis</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moon, Seok‐whan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jong‐hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Hyun‐woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Mi Hyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Thoracic cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moon, Seok‐whan</au><au>Seo, Jong‐hee</au><au>Jeon, Hyun‐woo</au><au>Moon, Mi Hyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of histological subtype and treatment modalities on T1–2 N0–1 small cell lung cancer: A population‐based study</atitle><jtitle>Thoracic cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Thorac Cancer</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1229</spage><epage>1240</epage><pages>1229-1240</pages><issn>1759-7706</issn><eissn>1759-7714</eissn><abstract>Background Combined small cell lung cancer (C‐SCLC) is rare and its clinical features, appropriate treatment, and prognosis are poorly understood. Reports conflict over the prognosis of C‐SCLCs compared to pure small cell lung cancer. Methods The records of patients diagnosed with primary SCLC from 1988 to 2014 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The general features of C‐SCLCs were compared to those of SCLCs. T1–2 N0–1 data was extracted and the effects of the histological subtype, treatment modality, and other prognostic factors on lung cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was analyzed in a 3:1 matched dataset. Analysis was performed using the 8th edition tumor node metastasis staging system and previous staging systems adjunctively. Results C‐SCLCs comprised 1.5% of all SCLCs (1486/98 667); 184 cases of C‐SCLCs and 2681 cases of non‐combined SCLCs (NC‐SCLCs) were included in this study. C‐SCLCs were more likely to be of a higher grade and to occur in the upper lobe than NC‐SCLCs. Before matching, C‐SCLCs showed better CSS (hazard ratio 0.69; P &lt; 0.001). However, stratified Cox proportional hazards analysis in the matched dataset revealed that only treatment modality and age at diagnosis were associated with CSS; the histological subtype had no effect on survival. Of all treatment modalities, surgery with chemoradiation showed the best CSS in T1–2 N0–1 SCLC. Conclusion In early SCLC, surgery with chemoradiation shows the best CSS. C‐SCLC patients might benefit more from multimodal treatments, including surgery, than SCLC patients.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>30993901</pmid><doi>10.1111/1759-7714.13073</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-4570</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1759-7706
ispartof Thoracic cancer, 2019-05, Vol.10 (5), p.1229-1240
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6501031
source Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
Combined small cell lung cancer
Datasets
Disease
Epidemiology
Lung cancer
Medical prognosis
Medical screening
Original
Patients
Population-based studies
SEER
small cell lung cancer
Surgery
Surveillance
survival analysis
Thoracic surgery
Variables
title Effect of histological subtype and treatment modalities on T1–2 N0–1 small cell lung cancer: A population‐based study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20histological%20subtype%20and%20treatment%20modalities%20on%20T1%E2%80%932%20N0%E2%80%931%20small%20cell%20lung%20cancer:%20A%20population%E2%80%90based%20study&rft.jtitle=Thoracic%20cancer&rft.au=Moon,%20Seok%E2%80%90whan&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1229&rft.epage=1240&rft.pages=1229-1240&rft.issn=1759-7706&rft.eissn=1759-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1759-7714.13073&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2210956322%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4673-24b2231bec1003385b1372c3f005b5d4456a37e645697b1995941c0345544ab23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290744817&rft_id=info:pmid/30993901&rfr_iscdi=true