Impact of a home visiting program on sleep problems among young children experiencing adversity

• Published in: Child abuse & neglect 2019-03, Vol.89, p.143-154
• Main Authors: Hash, Jonika B., Oxford, Monica L., Fleming, Charles B., Ward, Teresa M., Spieker, Susan J., Lohr, Mary Jane
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Adversity; Caregivers; Child; Child Protective Services; Child Rearing; Child welfare; Child, Preschool; Childrearing practices; Children; Children & youth; Clinical trials; Domiciliary visits; Female; Health visiting; Home health care; Home visiting; Home Visits; House Calls; Humans; Infant; Intervention; Male; Parent Child Relationship; Parent-Child Relations; Parental sensitivity; Parenting - psychology; Parents & parenting; Parents - psychology; Randomized Controlled Trials; Risk; Sleep; Sleep disorders; Sleep problems; Sleep Wake Disorders - therapy; Visitation; Young Children
• ISSN: 0145-2134; 1873-7757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.016

Adversity may negatively impact young children’s sleep but receiving home visitation services could buffer children from this potential consequence of adversity. This study examined whether young children’s adverse experiences increased their risk for sleep problems and if Promoting First Relationships® (PFR), a home visitation program, reduced children’s risk for sleep problems both directly and indirectly through increased parenting sensitivity. Participants were 247 parents and their 10- to 24-month-old child recruited from Child Protective Services offices. A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing PFR to a resource and referral control condition was conducted. Four time points of data were collected from baseline to 6 months post-intervention. Parenting sensitivity was measured at all time points using a parent-child interaction tool. Children’s adversities were measured at various time points using caregiver report tools and official state records. Children’s sleep problems were reported by parents at 6 months post-intervention. The likelihood of having a sleep problem increased as children’s adversities increased (β = .23, SE = .08, p = .005). There was no effect (direct or indirect) of treatment assignment on children’s sleep problems (ps > .05). Post hoc analyses showed a treatment assignment by adversity interaction such that children’s odds of having a sleep problem increased as their adversities increased, but only among children in the control condition (b = -0.37, SE = 0.17, p = .030). Experiencing more adversities associated with a greater risk for sleep problems, but PFR buffered children from this risk.