Magnetic stimulation for female patients with stress urinary incontinence, a meta-analysis of studies with short-term follow-up

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) 2019-05, Vol.98 (19), p.e15572-e15572
• Main Authors: Peng, Liao, Zeng, Xiao, Shen, Hong, Luo, De-yi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Female; Humans; Magnetic Field Therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - therapy
• ISSN: 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015572

To determine the efficacy of magnetic stimulation (MS) in female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by performing a meta-analysis on peer-reviewed randomized controlled trails (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were retrieved for any peer-reviewed original articles in English. Databases were searched up to July 2018. Included studies investigated effects of MS on SUI. The data were analyzed by review manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). A total of 4 studies involving 232 patients were identified and included in present meta-analysis. Compared with the sham stimulation, the MS group had statistically significantly fewer leaks/3 days (MD = -1.42; 95%CI: -2.42 to -0.59; P = .007), less urine loss on pad test (g.)/24 h (MD = -4.99; 95%CI: -8.46 to -1.53; P = .005), higher QoL scores (MD = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.02-0.82; P = .009), and lower ICIQ scores (MD = -4.60; 95%CI: -5.02 to -4.19; P