Effect of closed vacuum aspiration technique on lung collapse time in thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy

To investigate the effect of lung expansion and collapse method combined with closed vacuum aspiration technique on lung collapse time, reduce the waiting time of surgery.Forty patients with pulmonary peripheral nodules under thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy were divided into 20 cases of natur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2019-05, Vol.98 (21), p.e15447-e15447
Main Authors: Zhang, Zhenyang, Yang, Chuangcai, Lin, Jiangbo, Hong, Junjie, Zhuang, Yunyang, Kang, Mingqiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Complications - etiology
Intraoperative Complications - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - surgery
Pneumonectomy - adverse effects
Pneumonectomy - methods
Pulmonary Atelectasis - etiology
Pulmonary Atelectasis - therapy
Quality Improvement Study
Retrospective Studies
Thoracentesis - methods
Thoracoscopy - adverse effects
Thoracoscopy - methods
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vacuum
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate the effect of lung expansion and collapse method combined with closed vacuum aspiration technique on lung collapse time, reduce the waiting time of surgery.Forty patients with pulmonary peripheral nodules under thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy were divided into 20 cases of natural collapse group and 20 cases of modified collapse group. The natural collapse group used the traditional natural collapse method, and the modified collapse group used a lung expansion and collapse method combined with closed vacuum aspiration technique to record the lung collapse time and compare them.Thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy was successfully performed in both groups. The lung collapse time in the natural collapse group and the modified collapse group was 17.08 ± 1.35, 8.90 ± 0.39, respectively, P 
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000015447