Loading…
Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies
Introduction and hypothesis There is increased demand for an international overview of cost estimates and insight into the variation affecting these estimates. Understanding of these costs is useful for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) research into new treatment modalities and for clinical guideli...
Saved in:
Published in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2019-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1045-1059 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-dadbd3a43a420e91268aecdc6cdadcca6103d77fc894bb8006695c48a3976faa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-dadbd3a43a420e91268aecdc6cdadcca6103d77fc894bb8006695c48a3976faa3 |
container_end_page | 1059 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1045 |
container_title | International Urogynecology Journal |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Zwolsman, Sandra Kastelein, Arnoud Daams, Joost Roovers, Jan-Paul Opmeer, B. C. |
description | Introduction and hypothesis
There is increased demand for an international overview of cost estimates and insight into the variation affecting these estimates. Understanding of these costs is useful for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) research into new treatment modalities and for clinical guideline development.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE & other non-indexed materials and Ovid Embase for articles published between 1995 and 2017. The National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS-EED) filter and the McMaster sensitive therapy filter were combined with a bespoke search strategy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We extracted unit cost estimates, assessed variability and methodology, and determined transferability.
Results
We included 37 studies in this review. Four hundred and eighty-two cost estimates from 13 countries worldwide were extracted. Descriptive analysis shows that hospital stay in gynecology ranged between €82 and €1,292 per day. Costs of gynecological consultation range from €30 in France to €158 in Sweden. In the UK, costs are estimated at €228 per hour. Costs of a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) device range from €431 in Finland to €994 in Canada. TVT surgery per minute costs €25 in France and €82 in Sweden. Total costs of TVT range from €1,224 in Ireland to €5,809 for inpatient care in France. Variation was explored.
Conclusions
Heterogeneity was observed in cost estimates for all units at all levels of health care. CEAs of SUI interventions cannot be interpreted without bias when the base of these analyses—namely costs—cannot be compared and generalized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00192-018-3814-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6586692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2175712143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-dadbd3a43a420e91268aecdc6cdadcca6103d77fc894bb8006695c48a3976faa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EosvCD-CCLHHpJWVsJ3FyQaoqSpEqcYGz5XUmu66ydvE4i_bKL8fRlvIhIVnK4X3msScvY68FXAgA_Y4ARC8rEF2lOlFX8IStRK1UpUCqp2wFvdKVqlt5xl4Q3QFADQ08Z2cKtGga3azYjxvMmOIWA_p85HHkLlLmSNnvbUbiPvAd2invOLoY4t47jgc7zTb7GHhCQpvc7oJfcjpSxjJUiIQHj98XG-WCEJ-TDzYdi61Isg8YHJZsHjzSS_ZstBPhq4fvmn29_vDl6qa6_fzx09XlbeVqDbka7LAZlK3LkYC9kG1n0Q2udSVxzrYC1KD16Lq-3mw6gLbtG1d3VvW6Ha1Va_b-5L2fN3scHIac7GTuU9k0HU203vydBL8z23gwbdMVlyyC8wdBit_m8ovM3pPDabIB40xGCt03olfNgr79B72LcwplvYVqtJBLT2smTpRLkSjh-PgYAWZp2JwaNqVhszRsoMy8-XOLx4lflRZAngAqUdhi-n31_60_AZLAtag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2175712143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Zwolsman, Sandra ; Kastelein, Arnoud ; Daams, Joost ; Roovers, Jan-Paul ; Opmeer, B. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zwolsman, Sandra ; Kastelein, Arnoud ; Daams, Joost ; Roovers, Jan-Paul ; Opmeer, B. C. ; WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium ; On behalf of the WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and hypothesis
There is increased demand for an international overview of cost estimates and insight into the variation affecting these estimates. Understanding of these costs is useful for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) research into new treatment modalities and for clinical guideline development.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE & other non-indexed materials and Ovid Embase for articles published between 1995 and 2017. The National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS-EED) filter and the McMaster sensitive therapy filter were combined with a bespoke search strategy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We extracted unit cost estimates, assessed variability and methodology, and determined transferability.
Results
We included 37 studies in this review. Four hundred and eighty-two cost estimates from 13 countries worldwide were extracted. Descriptive analysis shows that hospital stay in gynecology ranged between €82 and €1,292 per day. Costs of gynecological consultation range from €30 in France to €158 in Sweden. In the UK, costs are estimated at €228 per hour. Costs of a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) device range from €431 in Finland to €994 in Canada. TVT surgery per minute costs €25 in France and €82 in Sweden. Total costs of TVT range from €1,224 in Ireland to €5,809 for inpatient care in France. Variation was explored.
Conclusions
Heterogeneity was observed in cost estimates for all units at all levels of health care. CEAs of SUI interventions cannot be interpreted without bias when the base of these analyses—namely costs—cannot be compared and generalized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3814-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30715575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Cost estimates ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Gynecology ; Gynecology - economics ; Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Health Services Research ; Hospital Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Review ; Review Article ; Suburethral Slings - economics ; Systematic review ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - economics ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2019-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1045-1059</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>International Urogynecology Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-dadbd3a43a420e91268aecdc6cdadcca6103d77fc894bb8006695c48a3976faa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-dadbd3a43a420e91268aecdc6cdadcca6103d77fc894bb8006695c48a3976faa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5863-5629</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30715575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zwolsman, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kastelein, Arnoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daams, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roovers, Jan-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opmeer, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Introduction and hypothesis
There is increased demand for an international overview of cost estimates and insight into the variation affecting these estimates. Understanding of these costs is useful for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) research into new treatment modalities and for clinical guideline development.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE & other non-indexed materials and Ovid Embase for articles published between 1995 and 2017. The National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS-EED) filter and the McMaster sensitive therapy filter were combined with a bespoke search strategy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We extracted unit cost estimates, assessed variability and methodology, and determined transferability.
Results
We included 37 studies in this review. Four hundred and eighty-two cost estimates from 13 countries worldwide were extracted. Descriptive analysis shows that hospital stay in gynecology ranged between €82 and €1,292 per day. Costs of gynecological consultation range from €30 in France to €158 in Sweden. In the UK, costs are estimated at €228 per hour. Costs of a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) device range from €431 in Finland to €994 in Canada. TVT surgery per minute costs €25 in France and €82 in Sweden. Total costs of TVT range from €1,224 in Ireland to €5,809 for inpatient care in France. Variation was explored.
Conclusions
Heterogeneity was observed in cost estimates for all units at all levels of health care. CEAs of SUI interventions cannot be interpreted without bias when the base of these analyses—namely costs—cannot be compared and generalized.</description><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology - economics</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospital Costs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Suburethral Slings - economics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - economics</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EosvCD-CCLHHpJWVsJ3FyQaoqSpEqcYGz5XUmu66ydvE4i_bKL8fRlvIhIVnK4X3msScvY68FXAgA_Y4ARC8rEF2lOlFX8IStRK1UpUCqp2wFvdKVqlt5xl4Q3QFADQ08Z2cKtGga3azYjxvMmOIWA_p85HHkLlLmSNnvbUbiPvAd2invOLoY4t47jgc7zTb7GHhCQpvc7oJfcjpSxjJUiIQHj98XG-WCEJ-TDzYdi61Isg8YHJZsHjzSS_ZstBPhq4fvmn29_vDl6qa6_fzx09XlbeVqDbka7LAZlK3LkYC9kG1n0Q2udSVxzrYC1KD16Lq-3mw6gLbtG1d3VvW6Ha1Va_b-5L2fN3scHIac7GTuU9k0HU203vydBL8z23gwbdMVlyyC8wdBit_m8ovM3pPDabIB40xGCt03olfNgr79B72LcwplvYVqtJBLT2smTpRLkSjh-PgYAWZp2JwaNqVhszRsoMy8-XOLx4lflRZAngAqUdhi-n31_60_AZLAtag</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Zwolsman, Sandra</creator><creator>Kastelein, Arnoud</creator><creator>Daams, Joost</creator><creator>Roovers, Jan-Paul</creator><creator>Opmeer, B. C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-5629</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies</title><author>Zwolsman, Sandra ; Kastelein, Arnoud ; Daams, Joost ; Roovers, Jan-Paul ; Opmeer, B. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-dadbd3a43a420e91268aecdc6cdadcca6103d77fc894bb8006695c48a3976faa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology - economics</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospital Costs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Suburethral Slings - economics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - economics</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zwolsman, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kastelein, Arnoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daams, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roovers, Jan-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opmeer, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On behalf of the WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zwolsman, Sandra</au><au>Kastelein, Arnoud</au><au>Daams, Joost</au><au>Roovers, Jan-Paul</au><au>Opmeer, B. C.</au><aucorp>WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium</aucorp><aucorp>On behalf of the WOMEN-UP Consortium: http://www.women-up.eu/consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1059</epage><pages>1045-1059</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Introduction and hypothesis
There is increased demand for an international overview of cost estimates and insight into the variation affecting these estimates. Understanding of these costs is useful for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) research into new treatment modalities and for clinical guideline development.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE & other non-indexed materials and Ovid Embase for articles published between 1995 and 2017. The National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS-EED) filter and the McMaster sensitive therapy filter were combined with a bespoke search strategy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We extracted unit cost estimates, assessed variability and methodology, and determined transferability.
Results
We included 37 studies in this review. Four hundred and eighty-two cost estimates from 13 countries worldwide were extracted. Descriptive analysis shows that hospital stay in gynecology ranged between €82 and €1,292 per day. Costs of gynecological consultation range from €30 in France to €158 in Sweden. In the UK, costs are estimated at €228 per hour. Costs of a tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) device range from €431 in Finland to €994 in Canada. TVT surgery per minute costs €25 in France and €82 in Sweden. Total costs of TVT range from €1,224 in Ireland to €5,809 for inpatient care in France. Variation was explored.
Conclusions
Heterogeneity was observed in cost estimates for all units at all levels of health care. CEAs of SUI interventions cannot be interpreted without bias when the base of these analyses—namely costs—cannot be compared and generalized.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>30715575</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00192-018-3814-0</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-5629</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-3462 |
ispartof | International Urogynecology Journal, 2019-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1045-1059 |
issn | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6586692 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Cost estimates Cost-Benefit Analysis Female Gynecology Gynecology - economics Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data Health Services Research Hospital Costs - statistics & numerical data Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Review Review Article Suburethral Slings - economics Systematic review Urinary incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress - economics Urology |
title | Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A18%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogeneity%20of%20cost%20estimates%20in%20health%20economic%20evaluation%20research.%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20stress%20urinary%20incontinence%20studies&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Zwolsman,%20Sandra&rft.aucorp=WOMEN-UP%20Consortium:%20http://www.women-up.eu/consortium&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1059&rft.pages=1045-1059&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-018-3814-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2175712143%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-dadbd3a43a420e91268aecdc6cdadcca6103d77fc894bb8006695c48a3976faa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2175712143&rft_id=info:pmid/30715575&rfr_iscdi=true |