Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index

The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users' responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about methodspecific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Studies in family planning 2019-03, Vol.50 (1), p.25-42
Main Authors: Chang, Karen T., Mukanu, Mulenga, Bellows, Ben, Hameed, Waqas, Kalamar, Amanda M., Grépin, Karen A., Gul, Xaher, Chakraborty, Nirali M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Birth control
Cohort Studies
Consistency
Contraception
Contraceptives
Counseling
Counseling - standards
Female
Humans
Inconsistency
Middle Aged
Pakistan
Patient Education as Topic - standards
Polls & surveys
Prospective Studies
Quality of Health Care
Responses
Side effects
Surveys and Questionnaires
Uganda
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users' responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about methodspecific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effects. The MII is increasingly reported in national surveys and used to track program performance, but little is known about its properties. Using additional questions, we assessed the consistency between responses and the method received in a prospective, multicountry study. We employed two definitions of consistency: (1) presence of any concordant response, and (2) absence of discordant responses. Consistency was high when asking whether users were informed about other methods and what to do about side effects. Responses were least consistent when asking whether side effects were mentioned. Adjusting for inconsistency, scores were up to 50 percent and 30 percent lower in Pakistan and Uganda, respectively, compared to unadjusted MII scores. Additional questions facilitated better understanding of counseling quality.
ISSN:0039-3665
1728-4465
DOI:10.1111/sifp.12081