Loading…

Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation

Despite their small size, microsaccades can impede stimulus detections if executed at inopportune times. Although it has been shown that microsaccades evoke both inhibitory and excitatory responses across different visual regions, their impact on the higher-level neural decision processes that bridg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of neuroscience 2018-02, Vol.38 (9), p.2163-2176
Main Authors: Loughnane, Gerard M, Newman, Daniel P, Tamang, Sarita, Kelly, Simon P, O'Connell, Redmond G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-4ae1537ee22b0bb8c070cc30ade46b82965574c7ebff59f450503c0b060782f83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-4ae1537ee22b0bb8c070cc30ade46b82965574c7ebff59f450503c0b060782f83
container_end_page 2176
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2163
container_title The Journal of neuroscience
container_volume 38
creator Loughnane, Gerard M
Newman, Daniel P
Tamang, Sarita
Kelly, Simon P
O'Connell, Redmond G
description Despite their small size, microsaccades can impede stimulus detections if executed at inopportune times. Although it has been shown that microsaccades evoke both inhibitory and excitatory responses across different visual regions, their impact on the higher-level neural decision processes that bridge sensory responses to action selection has yet to be examined. Here, we show that when human observers monitor stimuli for subtle feature changes, the occurrence of microsaccades long after (up to 800 ms) change onset predicts slower reaction times and this is accounted for by momentary suppression of neural signals at each key stage of decision formation: visual evidence encoding, evidence accumulation, and motor preparation. Our data further reveal that, independent of the timing of the change events, the onset of neural decision formation coincides with a systematic inhibition of microsaccade production, persisting until the perceptual report is executed. Our combined behavioral and neural measures highlight antagonistic interactions between microsaccade occurrence and evidence accumulation during visual decision-making tasks. When fixating on a location in space, we frequently make tiny eye movements called microsaccades. In the present study, we show that these microsaccades impede our ability to make perceptual decisions about visual stimuli and this impediment specifically occurs via the disruption of several processing levels of the sensorimotor network: the encoding of visual evidence itself, the accumulation of visual evidence toward a response, and effector-selective motor preparation. Furthermore, we show that the production of microsaccades is inhibited during the perceptual decision, possibly as a counteractive measure to mitigate their negative effect on behavior in this context. The combined behavioral and neural measures used in this study provide strong and novel evidence for the interaction of fixational eye movements and the perceptual decision-making process.
doi_str_mv 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2340-17.2018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6596275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1992015261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-4ae1537ee22b0bb8c070cc30ade46b82965574c7ebff59f450503c0b060782f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctu1DAUtRCIDoVfqCKxYZPp9StONkjDdEoHFYqAri3HczO4SuzWTor4exxaRsDqLs5D555DyAmFJZWMn374tLn-cvV1vV0yLqCkasmA1k_IIqNNyQTQp2QBTEFZCSWOyIuUbgBAAVXPyRFruKKcwYIMKz-affAujc4WWz9iNHZ0wafiHY4_EH3x0dkYkrHW7DAVxu-Kzb3bobdYrKydhqk3s6D4HIPFlDLnbIrO74sztC7NyHmIw2_OS_KsM33CV4_3mFyfb76tL8rLq_fb9eqytEKwsRQGqeQKkbEW2ra2Obe1HHIAUbU1ayoplbAK266TTSckSOAWWqhA1ayr-TF5--B7O7UD7iz6MZpe30Y3mPhTB-P0v4h33_U-3OtKNhVTMhu8eTSI4W7CNOrBJYt9bzyGKWnaNLlvySqaqa__o96EKfr8nmbQCFHXks2JqgfW3GWK2B3CUNDzovqwqJ4X1VTpedEsPPn7lYPsz4T8F8ipn6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2094488528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Loughnane, Gerard M ; Newman, Daniel P ; Tamang, Sarita ; Kelly, Simon P ; O'Connell, Redmond G</creator><creatorcontrib>Loughnane, Gerard M ; Newman, Daniel P ; Tamang, Sarita ; Kelly, Simon P ; O'Connell, Redmond G</creatorcontrib><description>Despite their small size, microsaccades can impede stimulus detections if executed at inopportune times. Although it has been shown that microsaccades evoke both inhibitory and excitatory responses across different visual regions, their impact on the higher-level neural decision processes that bridge sensory responses to action selection has yet to be examined. Here, we show that when human observers monitor stimuli for subtle feature changes, the occurrence of microsaccades long after (up to 800 ms) change onset predicts slower reaction times and this is accounted for by momentary suppression of neural signals at each key stage of decision formation: visual evidence encoding, evidence accumulation, and motor preparation. Our data further reveal that, independent of the timing of the change events, the onset of neural decision formation coincides with a systematic inhibition of microsaccade production, persisting until the perceptual report is executed. Our combined behavioral and neural measures highlight antagonistic interactions between microsaccade occurrence and evidence accumulation during visual decision-making tasks. When fixating on a location in space, we frequently make tiny eye movements called microsaccades. In the present study, we show that these microsaccades impede our ability to make perceptual decisions about visual stimuli and this impediment specifically occurs via the disruption of several processing levels of the sensorimotor network: the encoding of visual evidence itself, the accumulation of visual evidence toward a response, and effector-selective motor preparation. Furthermore, we show that the production of microsaccades is inhibited during the perceptual decision, possibly as a counteractive measure to mitigate their negative effect on behavior in this context. The combined behavioral and neural measures used in this study provide strong and novel evidence for the interaction of fixational eye movements and the perceptual decision-making process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2340-17.2018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29371320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Adult ; Coding ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Eye ; Eye movements ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Motors ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Saccades - physiology ; Sensorimotor system ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual signals ; Visual stimuli ; Visual tasks</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2018-02, Vol.38 (9), p.2163-2176</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/382163-14$15.00/0.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Neuroscience Feb 28, 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/382163-14$15.00/0 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-4ae1537ee22b0bb8c070cc30ade46b82965574c7ebff59f450503c0b060782f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-4ae1537ee22b0bb8c070cc30ade46b82965574c7ebff59f450503c0b060782f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8240-1876 ; 0000-0003-1961-5294</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596275/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596275/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29371320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loughnane, Gerard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamang, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Simon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Redmond G</creatorcontrib><title>Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Despite their small size, microsaccades can impede stimulus detections if executed at inopportune times. Although it has been shown that microsaccades evoke both inhibitory and excitatory responses across different visual regions, their impact on the higher-level neural decision processes that bridge sensory responses to action selection has yet to be examined. Here, we show that when human observers monitor stimuli for subtle feature changes, the occurrence of microsaccades long after (up to 800 ms) change onset predicts slower reaction times and this is accounted for by momentary suppression of neural signals at each key stage of decision formation: visual evidence encoding, evidence accumulation, and motor preparation. Our data further reveal that, independent of the timing of the change events, the onset of neural decision formation coincides with a systematic inhibition of microsaccade production, persisting until the perceptual report is executed. Our combined behavioral and neural measures highlight antagonistic interactions between microsaccade occurrence and evidence accumulation during visual decision-making tasks. When fixating on a location in space, we frequently make tiny eye movements called microsaccades. In the present study, we show that these microsaccades impede our ability to make perceptual decisions about visual stimuli and this impediment specifically occurs via the disruption of several processing levels of the sensorimotor network: the encoding of visual evidence itself, the accumulation of visual evidence toward a response, and effector-selective motor preparation. Furthermore, we show that the production of microsaccades is inhibited during the perceptual decision, possibly as a counteractive measure to mitigate their negative effect on behavior in this context. The combined behavioral and neural measures used in this study provide strong and novel evidence for the interaction of fixational eye movements and the perceptual decision-making process.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motors</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Saccades - physiology</subject><subject>Sensorimotor system</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual signals</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><subject>Visual tasks</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUctu1DAUtRCIDoVfqCKxYZPp9StONkjDdEoHFYqAri3HczO4SuzWTor4exxaRsDqLs5D555DyAmFJZWMn374tLn-cvV1vV0yLqCkasmA1k_IIqNNyQTQp2QBTEFZCSWOyIuUbgBAAVXPyRFruKKcwYIMKz-affAujc4WWz9iNHZ0wafiHY4_EH3x0dkYkrHW7DAVxu-Kzb3bobdYrKydhqk3s6D4HIPFlDLnbIrO74sztC7NyHmIw2_OS_KsM33CV4_3mFyfb76tL8rLq_fb9eqytEKwsRQGqeQKkbEW2ra2Obe1HHIAUbU1ayoplbAK266TTSckSOAWWqhA1ayr-TF5--B7O7UD7iz6MZpe30Y3mPhTB-P0v4h33_U-3OtKNhVTMhu8eTSI4W7CNOrBJYt9bzyGKWnaNLlvySqaqa__o96EKfr8nmbQCFHXks2JqgfW3GWK2B3CUNDzovqwqJ4X1VTpedEsPPn7lYPsz4T8F8ipn6I</recordid><startdate>20180228</startdate><enddate>20180228</enddate><creator>Loughnane, Gerard M</creator><creator>Newman, Daniel P</creator><creator>Tamang, Sarita</creator><creator>Kelly, Simon P</creator><creator>O'Connell, Redmond G</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-1876</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-5294</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180228</creationdate><title>Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation</title><author>Loughnane, Gerard M ; Newman, Daniel P ; Tamang, Sarita ; Kelly, Simon P ; O'Connell, Redmond G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-4ae1537ee22b0bb8c070cc30ade46b82965574c7ebff59f450503c0b060782f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motors</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Saccades - physiology</topic><topic>Sensorimotor system</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual signals</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><topic>Visual tasks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loughnane, Gerard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamang, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Simon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Redmond G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loughnane, Gerard M</au><au>Newman, Daniel P</au><au>Tamang, Sarita</au><au>Kelly, Simon P</au><au>O'Connell, Redmond G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2018-02-28</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2163</spage><epage>2176</epage><pages>2163-2176</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>Despite their small size, microsaccades can impede stimulus detections if executed at inopportune times. Although it has been shown that microsaccades evoke both inhibitory and excitatory responses across different visual regions, their impact on the higher-level neural decision processes that bridge sensory responses to action selection has yet to be examined. Here, we show that when human observers monitor stimuli for subtle feature changes, the occurrence of microsaccades long after (up to 800 ms) change onset predicts slower reaction times and this is accounted for by momentary suppression of neural signals at each key stage of decision formation: visual evidence encoding, evidence accumulation, and motor preparation. Our data further reveal that, independent of the timing of the change events, the onset of neural decision formation coincides with a systematic inhibition of microsaccade production, persisting until the perceptual report is executed. Our combined behavioral and neural measures highlight antagonistic interactions between microsaccade occurrence and evidence accumulation during visual decision-making tasks. When fixating on a location in space, we frequently make tiny eye movements called microsaccades. In the present study, we show that these microsaccades impede our ability to make perceptual decisions about visual stimuli and this impediment specifically occurs via the disruption of several processing levels of the sensorimotor network: the encoding of visual evidence itself, the accumulation of visual evidence toward a response, and effector-selective motor preparation. Furthermore, we show that the production of microsaccades is inhibited during the perceptual decision, possibly as a counteractive measure to mitigate their negative effect on behavior in this context. The combined behavioral and neural measures used in this study provide strong and novel evidence for the interaction of fixational eye movements and the perceptual decision-making process.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>29371320</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2340-17.2018</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-1876</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-5294</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-6474
ispartof The Journal of neuroscience, 2018-02, Vol.38 (9), p.2163-2176
issn 0270-6474
1529-2401
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6596275
source Open Access: PubMed Central
subjects Accumulation
Adult
Coding
Decision making
Decision Making - physiology
Eye
Eye movements
Female
Humans
Male
Motors
Reaction Time - physiology
Saccades - physiology
Sensorimotor system
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual signals
Visual stimuli
Visual tasks
title Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A15%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antagonistic%20Interactions%20Between%20Microsaccades%20and%20Evidence%20Accumulation%20Processes%20During%20Decision%20Formation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Loughnane,%20Gerard%20M&rft.date=2018-02-28&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2163&rft.epage=2176&rft.pages=2163-2176&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2340-17.2018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1992015261%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-4ae1537ee22b0bb8c070cc30ade46b82965574c7ebff59f450503c0b060782f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2094488528&rft_id=info:pmid/29371320&rfr_iscdi=true