Loading…
Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising...
Saved in:
Published in: | Animal cognition 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.1221-1230 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83 |
container_end_page | 1230 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1221 |
container_title | Animal cognition |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Basile, Benjamin M. Moylan, Emily J. Charles, David P. Murray, Elisabeth A. |
description | Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6620025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1727698227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhkOxuH79gN6UAW-2F6P5mklyUxBpVdjSG70OmcyZNXYm0WSmRX99s64uq1AogSRwnvPmPXkR-kTwCcFYnKbVTkpMqhJLRcqnD2iPcFaVilf1zubO5Qztp3SHMZZckV00ozXhFFdsD11d_wmlG2EokhngtHVdBxH8WLQu2egG583ogi-cL-ItpCkVQ_C_4DEV8x_G5lUMU2_G0Xw5RB870yc4ejkP0M33b9fnl-Xi58XV-dmitBVmY0k7zFSrsGJNQyyjTcWVJW32ZQUYI6wwXIiOsMYwibtOWbDAOAEpFOONZAfo61r3fmoGaG02G02v77NZEx91ME6_rXh3q5fht65rijGtssD8RSCGhwnSqIc8K_S98RCmpImgolaSUvE_KFVUEakyevwOvQtT9PknnilWSfpMkTVlY0gpQrfxTbBepanXmeqcqV5lqp9yz-ftgTcdryFmgK6BlEt-CXHr6X-q_gXMBazo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722358289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Basile, Benjamin M. ; Moylan, Emily J. ; Charles, David P. ; Murray, Elisabeth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Basile, Benjamin M. ; Moylan, Emily J. ; Charles, David P. ; Murray, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><description>Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26142053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal cognition ; Animals ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Concept Formation ; Discrimination Learning ; Laboratory tests ; Learning ; Life Sciences ; Macaca mulatta ; Macaca mulatta - psychology ; Male ; Monkeys & apes ; Original Paper ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Psychology Research ; Transfer (Psychology) ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.1221-1230</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2015</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26142053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basile, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moylan, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought.</description><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monkeys & apes</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Transfer (Psychology)</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhkOxuH79gN6UAW-2F6P5mklyUxBpVdjSG70OmcyZNXYm0WSmRX99s64uq1AogSRwnvPmPXkR-kTwCcFYnKbVTkpMqhJLRcqnD2iPcFaVilf1zubO5Qztp3SHMZZckV00ozXhFFdsD11d_wmlG2EokhngtHVdBxH8WLQu2egG583ogi-cL-ItpCkVQ_C_4DEV8x_G5lUMU2_G0Xw5RB870yc4ejkP0M33b9fnl-Xi58XV-dmitBVmY0k7zFSrsGJNQyyjTcWVJW32ZQUYI6wwXIiOsMYwibtOWbDAOAEpFOONZAfo61r3fmoGaG02G02v77NZEx91ME6_rXh3q5fht65rijGtssD8RSCGhwnSqIc8K_S98RCmpImgolaSUvE_KFVUEakyevwOvQtT9PknnilWSfpMkTVlY0gpQrfxTbBepanXmeqcqV5lqp9yz-ftgTcdryFmgK6BlEt-CXHr6X-q_gXMBazo</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Basile, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Moylan, Emily J.</creator><creator>Charles, David P.</creator><creator>Murray, Elisabeth A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</title><author>Basile, Benjamin M. ; Moylan, Emily J. ; Charles, David P. ; Murray, Elisabeth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monkeys & apes</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Transfer (Psychology)</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basile, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moylan, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basile, Benjamin M.</au><au>Moylan, Emily J.</au><au>Charles, David P.</au><au>Murray, Elisabeth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1221</spage><epage>1230</epage><pages>1221-1230</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26142053</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-9448 |
ispartof | Animal cognition, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.1221-1230 |
issn | 1435-9448 1435-9456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6620025 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Animal cognition Animals Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Choice Behavior Concept Formation Discrimination Learning Laboratory tests Learning Life Sciences Macaca mulatta Macaca mulatta - psychology Male Monkeys & apes Original Paper Pattern Recognition, Visual Psychology Research Transfer (Psychology) Zoology |
title | Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A28%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two-item%20same/different%20discrimination%20in%20rhesus%20monkeys%20(Macaca%20mulatta)&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Basile,%20Benjamin%20M.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1221&rft.epage=1230&rft.pages=1221-1230&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1727698227%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722358289&rft_id=info:pmid/26142053&rfr_iscdi=true |