Loading…

Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal cognition 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.1221-1230
Main Authors: Basile, Benjamin M., Moylan, Emily J., Charles, David P., Murray, Elisabeth A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83
container_end_page 1230
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1221
container_title Animal cognition
container_volume 18
creator Basile, Benjamin M.
Moylan, Emily J.
Charles, David P.
Murray, Elisabeth A.
description Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6620025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1727698227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhkOxuH79gN6UAW-2F6P5mklyUxBpVdjSG70OmcyZNXYm0WSmRX99s64uq1AogSRwnvPmPXkR-kTwCcFYnKbVTkpMqhJLRcqnD2iPcFaVilf1zubO5Qztp3SHMZZckV00ozXhFFdsD11d_wmlG2EokhngtHVdBxH8WLQu2egG583ogi-cL-ItpCkVQ_C_4DEV8x_G5lUMU2_G0Xw5RB870yc4ejkP0M33b9fnl-Xi58XV-dmitBVmY0k7zFSrsGJNQyyjTcWVJW32ZQUYI6wwXIiOsMYwibtOWbDAOAEpFOONZAfo61r3fmoGaG02G02v77NZEx91ME6_rXh3q5fht65rijGtssD8RSCGhwnSqIc8K_S98RCmpImgolaSUvE_KFVUEakyevwOvQtT9PknnilWSfpMkTVlY0gpQrfxTbBepanXmeqcqV5lqp9yz-ftgTcdryFmgK6BlEt-CXHr6X-q_gXMBazo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722358289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Basile, Benjamin M. ; Moylan, Emily J. ; Charles, David P. ; Murray, Elisabeth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Basile, Benjamin M. ; Moylan, Emily J. ; Charles, David P. ; Murray, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><description>Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26142053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal cognition ; Animals ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Concept Formation ; Discrimination Learning ; Laboratory tests ; Learning ; Life Sciences ; Macaca mulatta ; Macaca mulatta - psychology ; Male ; Monkeys &amp; apes ; Original Paper ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Psychology Research ; Transfer (Psychology) ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.1221-1230</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2015</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26142053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basile, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moylan, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought.</description><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta</subject><subject>Macaca mulatta - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monkeys &amp; apes</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Transfer (Psychology)</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhkOxuH79gN6UAW-2F6P5mklyUxBpVdjSG70OmcyZNXYm0WSmRX99s64uq1AogSRwnvPmPXkR-kTwCcFYnKbVTkpMqhJLRcqnD2iPcFaVilf1zubO5Qztp3SHMZZckV00ozXhFFdsD11d_wmlG2EokhngtHVdBxH8WLQu2egG583ogi-cL-ItpCkVQ_C_4DEV8x_G5lUMU2_G0Xw5RB870yc4ejkP0M33b9fnl-Xi58XV-dmitBVmY0k7zFSrsGJNQyyjTcWVJW32ZQUYI6wwXIiOsMYwibtOWbDAOAEpFOONZAfo61r3fmoGaG02G02v77NZEx91ME6_rXh3q5fht65rijGtssD8RSCGhwnSqIc8K_S98RCmpImgolaSUvE_KFVUEakyevwOvQtT9PknnilWSfpMkTVlY0gpQrfxTbBepanXmeqcqV5lqp9yz-ftgTcdryFmgK6BlEt-CXHr6X-q_gXMBazo</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Basile, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Moylan, Emily J.</creator><creator>Charles, David P.</creator><creator>Murray, Elisabeth A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</title><author>Basile, Benjamin M. ; Moylan, Emily J. ; Charles, David P. ; Murray, Elisabeth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta</topic><topic>Macaca mulatta - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monkeys &amp; apes</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Transfer (Psychology)</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basile, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moylan, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Elisabeth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basile, Benjamin M.</au><au>Moylan, Emily J.</au><au>Charles, David P.</au><au>Murray, Elisabeth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1221</spage><epage>1230</epage><pages>1221-1230</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Almost all nonhuman animals can recognize when one item is the same as another item. It is less clear whether nonhuman animals possess abstract concepts of “same” and “different” that can be divorced from perceptual similarity. Pigeons and monkeys show inconsistent performance, and often surprising difficulty, in laboratory tests of same/different learning that involve only two items. Previous results from tests using multi-item arrays suggest that nonhumans compute sameness along a continuous scale of perceptual variability, which would explain the difficulty of making two-item same/different judgments. Here, we provide evidence that rhesus monkeys can learn a two-item same/different discrimination similar to those on which monkeys and pigeons have previously failed. Monkeys’ performance transferred to novel stimuli and was not affected by perceptual variations in stimulus size, rotation, view, or luminance. Success without the use of multi-item arrays, and the lack of effect of perceptual variability, suggests a computation of sameness that is more categorical, and perhaps more abstract, than previously thought.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26142053</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-9448
ispartof Animal cognition, 2015-11, Vol.18 (6), p.1221-1230
issn 1435-9448
1435-9456
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6620025
source Springer Nature
subjects Animal cognition
Animals
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Choice Behavior
Concept Formation
Discrimination Learning
Laboratory tests
Learning
Life Sciences
Macaca mulatta
Macaca mulatta - psychology
Male
Monkeys & apes
Original Paper
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Psychology Research
Transfer (Psychology)
Zoology
title Two-item same/different discrimination in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A28%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two-item%20same/different%20discrimination%20in%20rhesus%20monkeys%20(Macaca%20mulatta)&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Basile,%20Benjamin%20M.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1221&rft.epage=1230&rft.pages=1221-1230&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-015-0891-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1727698227%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-2f039d9093bb1c32b549c1d491c7eaa7c7a477f13ba380ff9cece341e87934b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722358289&rft_id=info:pmid/26142053&rfr_iscdi=true