Loading…

A patchy continuum? Stream processes show varied responses to patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses

Many conceptual syntheses in ecology and evolution are undergirded by either a patch‐ or continuum‐based model. Examples include gradualism and punctuated equilibrium in evolution, and edge effects and the theory of island biogeography in ecology. In this study, we sought to determine how patch‐ or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2018-11, Vol.9 (11), p.n/a
Main Authors: Collins, Sean E., Matter, Stephen F., Buffam, Ishi, Flotemersch, Joseph E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-741a00fc0319518dd401d26692b1c50cc949d30ef389caa6c30e64da84a659073
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-741a00fc0319518dd401d26692b1c50cc949d30ef389caa6c30e64da84a659073
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)
container_volume 9
creator Collins, Sean E.
Matter, Stephen F.
Buffam, Ishi
Flotemersch, Joseph E.
description Many conceptual syntheses in ecology and evolution are undergirded by either a patch‐ or continuum‐based model. Examples include gradualism and punctuated equilibrium in evolution, and edge effects and the theory of island biogeography in ecology. In this study, we sought to determine how patch‐ or continuum‐based analyses could explain variation in concentrations of stream macronutrients and system metabolism, represented by measures of productivity and respiration rates, at the watershed scale across the Kanawha River Basin, USA. Using Strahler stream order (SSO; continuum) and functional process zone (FPZ; patch) as factors, we produced statistical models for each variable and compared model performance using likelihood ratio tests. Only one nutrient (i.e., PO43−) responded better to patch‐based analysis. Both models were significantly better than a null model for ecosystem respiration; however, neither outperformed the other. Importantly, in most cases, a combination model, including both SSO and FPZ, best described observed variation in the system. Our findings suggest that several patch‐ and continuum‐based processes may simultaneously influence the concentration of macronutrients and system metabolism. Nutrient spiraling along a continuum and the patch mosaic of land cover may both alter macronutrients, for example. Similarly, increases in temperature and discharge associated with increasing SSO, as well as the differences in light availability and channel morphology associated with different FPZs, may influence system metabolism. For these reasons, we recommend a combination of patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses when modeling, analyzing, and interpreting patterns in stream ecosystem parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecs2.2481
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6621553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2257713616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-741a00fc0319518dd401d26692b1c50cc949d30ef389caa6c30e64da84a659073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoKurCF5CCG12Mk1vTdqMMw3gBwcXoOpxJU6fSNjVpHbrzEXxGn8TU0XEUzCaHky8fJ_kROiT4jGBMh1o5ekZ5TDbQLiUhHsQJDTfX6h104NwT9ivkUczZNtphhCYRw3gX6VFQQ6PmXaBM1eRV25YXwbSxGsqgtkZp57QL3NwsghewuU4Dq11tqr7bmOXd99e3AKr0x-AbM3CehQqKzqP7aCuDwumDr30PPVxO7sfXg9u7q5vx6HagOGdkEHECGGcKM5KEJE5TjklKhUjojKgQK5XwJGVYZyxOFIBQvhY8hZiDCBMcsT10vvTW7azUqdJVY6GQtc1LsJ00kMvfJ1U-l4_mRQrhvytkXnDyJbDmudWukWXulC4KqLRpnaQ0jCLCBBEePf6DPpnW-gf3lIgZJiTqqdMlpaxxzupsNQzBss9P9vnJPj_PHq1PvyK_0_LAcAks8kJ3_5vkZDyln8oPm5Om1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268301176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A patchy continuum? Stream processes show varied responses to patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Collins, Sean E. ; Matter, Stephen F. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Flotemersch, Joseph E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sean E. ; Matter, Stephen F. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Flotemersch, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><description>Many conceptual syntheses in ecology and evolution are undergirded by either a patch‐ or continuum‐based model. Examples include gradualism and punctuated equilibrium in evolution, and edge effects and the theory of island biogeography in ecology. In this study, we sought to determine how patch‐ or continuum‐based analyses could explain variation in concentrations of stream macronutrients and system metabolism, represented by measures of productivity and respiration rates, at the watershed scale across the Kanawha River Basin, USA. Using Strahler stream order (SSO; continuum) and functional process zone (FPZ; patch) as factors, we produced statistical models for each variable and compared model performance using likelihood ratio tests. Only one nutrient (i.e., PO43−) responded better to patch‐based analysis. Both models were significantly better than a null model for ecosystem respiration; however, neither outperformed the other. Importantly, in most cases, a combination model, including both SSO and FPZ, best described observed variation in the system. Our findings suggest that several patch‐ and continuum‐based processes may simultaneously influence the concentration of macronutrients and system metabolism. Nutrient spiraling along a continuum and the patch mosaic of land cover may both alter macronutrients, for example. Similarly, increases in temperature and discharge associated with increasing SSO, as well as the differences in light availability and channel morphology associated with different FPZs, may influence system metabolism. For these reasons, we recommend a combination of patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses when modeling, analyzing, and interpreting patterns in stream ecosystem parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2481</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31297300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biogeography ; Channel morphology ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Ecology ; ecosystem metabolism ; Ecosystems ; functional process zone ; Hypotheses ; Kanawha River ; Land use ; Macroevolution ; macronutrient concentration ; Metabolism ; nitrate ; Nutrient concentrations ; Nutrients ; phosphate ; Respiration ; River basins ; River Continuum Concept ; River ecology ; Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis ; Statistical models ; Stream order ; Trends ; watershed ; Watershed management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2018-11, Vol.9 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-741a00fc0319518dd401d26692b1c50cc949d30ef389caa6c30e64da84a659073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-741a00fc0319518dd401d26692b1c50cc949d30ef389caa6c30e64da84a659073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2268301176/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2268301176?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297300$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matter, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Ishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flotemersch, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><title>A patchy continuum? Stream processes show varied responses to patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><addtitle>Ecosphere</addtitle><description>Many conceptual syntheses in ecology and evolution are undergirded by either a patch‐ or continuum‐based model. Examples include gradualism and punctuated equilibrium in evolution, and edge effects and the theory of island biogeography in ecology. In this study, we sought to determine how patch‐ or continuum‐based analyses could explain variation in concentrations of stream macronutrients and system metabolism, represented by measures of productivity and respiration rates, at the watershed scale across the Kanawha River Basin, USA. Using Strahler stream order (SSO; continuum) and functional process zone (FPZ; patch) as factors, we produced statistical models for each variable and compared model performance using likelihood ratio tests. Only one nutrient (i.e., PO43−) responded better to patch‐based analysis. Both models were significantly better than a null model for ecosystem respiration; however, neither outperformed the other. Importantly, in most cases, a combination model, including both SSO and FPZ, best described observed variation in the system. Our findings suggest that several patch‐ and continuum‐based processes may simultaneously influence the concentration of macronutrients and system metabolism. Nutrient spiraling along a continuum and the patch mosaic of land cover may both alter macronutrients, for example. Similarly, increases in temperature and discharge associated with increasing SSO, as well as the differences in light availability and channel morphology associated with different FPZs, may influence system metabolism. For these reasons, we recommend a combination of patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses when modeling, analyzing, and interpreting patterns in stream ecosystem parameters.</description><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Channel morphology</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystem metabolism</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>functional process zone</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Kanawha River</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Macroevolution</subject><subject>macronutrient concentration</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>phosphate</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>River Continuum Concept</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Stream order</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>watershed</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoKurCF5CCG12Mk1vTdqMMw3gBwcXoOpxJU6fSNjVpHbrzEXxGn8TU0XEUzCaHky8fJ_kROiT4jGBMh1o5ekZ5TDbQLiUhHsQJDTfX6h104NwT9ivkUczZNtphhCYRw3gX6VFQQ6PmXaBM1eRV25YXwbSxGsqgtkZp57QL3NwsghewuU4Dq11tqr7bmOXd99e3AKr0x-AbM3CehQqKzqP7aCuDwumDr30PPVxO7sfXg9u7q5vx6HagOGdkEHECGGcKM5KEJE5TjklKhUjojKgQK5XwJGVYZyxOFIBQvhY8hZiDCBMcsT10vvTW7azUqdJVY6GQtc1LsJ00kMvfJ1U-l4_mRQrhvytkXnDyJbDmudWukWXulC4KqLRpnaQ0jCLCBBEePf6DPpnW-gf3lIgZJiTqqdMlpaxxzupsNQzBss9P9vnJPj_PHq1PvyK_0_LAcAks8kJ3_5vkZDyln8oPm5Om1Q</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Collins, Sean E.</creator><creator>Matter, Stephen F.</creator><creator>Buffam, Ishi</creator><creator>Flotemersch, Joseph E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>A patchy continuum? Stream processes show varied responses to patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses</title><author>Collins, Sean E. ; Matter, Stephen F. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Flotemersch, Joseph E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-741a00fc0319518dd401d26692b1c50cc949d30ef389caa6c30e64da84a659073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Channel morphology</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystem metabolism</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>functional process zone</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Kanawha River</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Macroevolution</topic><topic>macronutrient concentration</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>phosphate</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>River Continuum Concept</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Stream order</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>watershed</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, Sean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matter, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Ishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flotemersch, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Free Backfiles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, Sean E.</au><au>Matter, Stephen F.</au><au>Buffam, Ishi</au><au>Flotemersch, Joseph E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A patchy continuum? Stream processes show varied responses to patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecosphere</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Many conceptual syntheses in ecology and evolution are undergirded by either a patch‐ or continuum‐based model. Examples include gradualism and punctuated equilibrium in evolution, and edge effects and the theory of island biogeography in ecology. In this study, we sought to determine how patch‐ or continuum‐based analyses could explain variation in concentrations of stream macronutrients and system metabolism, represented by measures of productivity and respiration rates, at the watershed scale across the Kanawha River Basin, USA. Using Strahler stream order (SSO; continuum) and functional process zone (FPZ; patch) as factors, we produced statistical models for each variable and compared model performance using likelihood ratio tests. Only one nutrient (i.e., PO43−) responded better to patch‐based analysis. Both models were significantly better than a null model for ecosystem respiration; however, neither outperformed the other. Importantly, in most cases, a combination model, including both SSO and FPZ, best described observed variation in the system. Our findings suggest that several patch‐ and continuum‐based processes may simultaneously influence the concentration of macronutrients and system metabolism. Nutrient spiraling along a continuum and the patch mosaic of land cover may both alter macronutrients, for example. Similarly, increases in temperature and discharge associated with increasing SSO, as well as the differences in light availability and channel morphology associated with different FPZs, may influence system metabolism. For these reasons, we recommend a combination of patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses when modeling, analyzing, and interpreting patterns in stream ecosystem parameters.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31297300</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecs2.2481</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2150-8925
ispartof Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2018-11, Vol.9 (11), p.n/a
issn 2150-8925
2150-8925
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6621553
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Biogeography
Channel morphology
Creeks & streams
Ecology
ecosystem metabolism
Ecosystems
functional process zone
Hypotheses
Kanawha River
Land use
Macroevolution
macronutrient concentration
Metabolism
nitrate
Nutrient concentrations
Nutrients
phosphate
Respiration
River basins
River Continuum Concept
River ecology
Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis
Statistical models
Stream order
Trends
watershed
Watershed management
Watersheds
title A patchy continuum? Stream processes show varied responses to patch‐ and continuum‐based analyses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A34%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20patchy%20continuum?%20Stream%20processes%20show%20varied%20responses%20to%20patch%E2%80%90%20and%20continuum%E2%80%90based%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=Collins,%20Sean%20E.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecs2.2481&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2257713616%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4431-741a00fc0319518dd401d26692b1c50cc949d30ef389caa6c30e64da84a659073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268301176&rft_id=info:pmid/31297300&rfr_iscdi=true