Loading…
Emergency Medicine Resident Efficiency and Emergency Department Crowding
Objectives Provider efficiency has been reported in the literature but there is a lack of efficiency analysis among emergency medicine (EM) residents. We aim to compare efficiency of EM residents of different training levels and determine if EM resident efficiency is affected by emergency department...
Saved in:
Published in: | AEM education and training 2019-07, Vol.3 (3), p.209-217 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4207-80de3f5af65b000e513a9aa89869dc0b9661521c67a509df9fd564615188b1213 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4207-80de3f5af65b000e513a9aa89869dc0b9661521c67a509df9fd564615188b1213 |
container_end_page | 217 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | AEM education and training |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Kirby, Ryan Robinson, Richard D. Dib, Sasha Mclarty, Daisha Shaikh, Sajid Cheeti, Radhika Ho, Amy F. Schrader, Chet D. Zenarosa, Nestor R. Wang, Hao Runde, Daniel P. |
description | Objectives
Provider efficiency has been reported in the literature but there is a lack of efficiency analysis among emergency medicine (EM) residents. We aim to compare efficiency of EM residents of different training levels and determine if EM resident efficiency is affected by emergency department (ED) crowding.
Methods
We conducted a single‐center retrospective observation study from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. The number of new patients per resident per hour and provider‐to‐disposition (PTD) time of each patient were used as resident efficiency markers. A crowding score was assigned to each patient upon the patient's arrival to the ED. We compared efficiency among EM residents of different training levels under different ED crowding statuses. Dynamic efficiency changes were compared monthly through the entire academic year (July to next June).
Results
The study enrolled a total of 150,920 patients. A mean of 1.9 patients/hour was seen by PGY‐1 EM residents in comparison to 2.6 patients/hour by PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. Median PTD was 2.8 hours in PGY‐1 EM residents versus 2.6 hours in PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. There were no significant differences in acuity across all patients seen by EM residents. When crowded conditions existed, residency efficiency increased, but such changes were minimized when the ED became overcrowded. A linear increase of resident efficiency was observed only in PGY‐1 EM residents throughout the entire academic year.
Conclusion
Resident efficiency improved significantly only during their first year of EM training. This efficiency can be affected by ED crowding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aet2.10327 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6637007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2267011969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4207-80de3f5af65b000e513a9aa89869dc0b9661521c67a509df9fd564615188b1213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVmov_gDpUYTqJNnNbi5CqdUKFUHqOWQ3szWyHzVpLf33ph_WevGUYebhyctLyAWFGwrAbjXOWZg4S47IGYsS1ou5hOODuUU63n8AAE2jmAI7JS1OuYCU8jMyGlbopljnq-4zGpvbGruv6K3Bet4dFkXYbI66Nt1f9B5n2s2rNTNwzdLYenpOTgpdeuzs3jZ5exhOBqPe-OXxadAf9_KIQdJLwSAvYl2IOAuRMKZcS61TmQppcsikEDRmNBeJjkGaQhYmFlHY0TTNKKO8Te623tkiq9DkIYPTpZo5W2m3Uo226u-ltu9q2nwpIXgCkATB1U7gms8F-rmqrM-xLHWNzcIrxkQClEohA3q9RXPXeO-w2H9DQa3bV-v21ab9AF8eBtujP10HgG6BpS1x9Y9K9YcTtpV-A3JWjoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267011969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergency Medicine Resident Efficiency and Emergency Department Crowding</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kirby, Ryan ; Robinson, Richard D. ; Dib, Sasha ; Mclarty, Daisha ; Shaikh, Sajid ; Cheeti, Radhika ; Ho, Amy F. ; Schrader, Chet D. ; Zenarosa, Nestor R. ; Wang, Hao ; Runde, Daniel P.</creator><contributor>Runde, Daniel P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Ryan ; Robinson, Richard D. ; Dib, Sasha ; Mclarty, Daisha ; Shaikh, Sajid ; Cheeti, Radhika ; Ho, Amy F. ; Schrader, Chet D. ; Zenarosa, Nestor R. ; Wang, Hao ; Runde, Daniel P. ; Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Provider efficiency has been reported in the literature but there is a lack of efficiency analysis among emergency medicine (EM) residents. We aim to compare efficiency of EM residents of different training levels and determine if EM resident efficiency is affected by emergency department (ED) crowding.
Methods
We conducted a single‐center retrospective observation study from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. The number of new patients per resident per hour and provider‐to‐disposition (PTD) time of each patient were used as resident efficiency markers. A crowding score was assigned to each patient upon the patient's arrival to the ED. We compared efficiency among EM residents of different training levels under different ED crowding statuses. Dynamic efficiency changes were compared monthly through the entire academic year (July to next June).
Results
The study enrolled a total of 150,920 patients. A mean of 1.9 patients/hour was seen by PGY‐1 EM residents in comparison to 2.6 patients/hour by PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. Median PTD was 2.8 hours in PGY‐1 EM residents versus 2.6 hours in PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. There were no significant differences in acuity across all patients seen by EM residents. When crowded conditions existed, residency efficiency increased, but such changes were minimized when the ED became overcrowded. A linear increase of resident efficiency was observed only in PGY‐1 EM residents throughout the entire academic year.
Conclusion
Resident efficiency improved significantly only during their first year of EM training. This efficiency can be affected by ED crowding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10327</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31360813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Original Contribution ; Original Contributions</subject><ispartof>AEM education and training, 2019-07, Vol.3 (3), p.209-217</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4207-80de3f5af65b000e513a9aa89869dc0b9661521c67a509df9fd564615188b1213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4207-80de3f5af65b000e513a9aa89869dc0b9661521c67a509df9fd564615188b1213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637007/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637007/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31360813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Runde, Daniel P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dib, Sasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mclarty, Daisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Sajid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheeti, Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Amy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Chet D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenarosa, Nestor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><title>Emergency Medicine Resident Efficiency and Emergency Department Crowding</title><title>AEM education and training</title><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><description>Objectives
Provider efficiency has been reported in the literature but there is a lack of efficiency analysis among emergency medicine (EM) residents. We aim to compare efficiency of EM residents of different training levels and determine if EM resident efficiency is affected by emergency department (ED) crowding.
Methods
We conducted a single‐center retrospective observation study from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. The number of new patients per resident per hour and provider‐to‐disposition (PTD) time of each patient were used as resident efficiency markers. A crowding score was assigned to each patient upon the patient's arrival to the ED. We compared efficiency among EM residents of different training levels under different ED crowding statuses. Dynamic efficiency changes were compared monthly through the entire academic year (July to next June).
Results
The study enrolled a total of 150,920 patients. A mean of 1.9 patients/hour was seen by PGY‐1 EM residents in comparison to 2.6 patients/hour by PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. Median PTD was 2.8 hours in PGY‐1 EM residents versus 2.6 hours in PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. There were no significant differences in acuity across all patients seen by EM residents. When crowded conditions existed, residency efficiency increased, but such changes were minimized when the ED became overcrowded. A linear increase of resident efficiency was observed only in PGY‐1 EM residents throughout the entire academic year.
Conclusion
Resident efficiency improved significantly only during their first year of EM training. This efficiency can be affected by ED crowding.</description><subject>Original Contribution</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><issn>2472-5390</issn><issn>2472-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVmov_gDpUYTqJNnNbi5CqdUKFUHqOWQ3szWyHzVpLf33ph_WevGUYebhyctLyAWFGwrAbjXOWZg4S47IGYsS1ou5hOODuUU63n8AAE2jmAI7JS1OuYCU8jMyGlbopljnq-4zGpvbGruv6K3Bet4dFkXYbI66Nt1f9B5n2s2rNTNwzdLYenpOTgpdeuzs3jZ5exhOBqPe-OXxadAf9_KIQdJLwSAvYl2IOAuRMKZcS61TmQppcsikEDRmNBeJjkGaQhYmFlHY0TTNKKO8Te623tkiq9DkIYPTpZo5W2m3Uo226u-ltu9q2nwpIXgCkATB1U7gms8F-rmqrM-xLHWNzcIrxkQClEohA3q9RXPXeO-w2H9DQa3bV-v21ab9AF8eBtujP10HgG6BpS1x9Y9K9YcTtpV-A3JWjoE</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Kirby, Ryan</creator><creator>Robinson, Richard D.</creator><creator>Dib, Sasha</creator><creator>Mclarty, Daisha</creator><creator>Shaikh, Sajid</creator><creator>Cheeti, Radhika</creator><creator>Ho, Amy F.</creator><creator>Schrader, Chet D.</creator><creator>Zenarosa, Nestor R.</creator><creator>Wang, Hao</creator><creator>Runde, Daniel P.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Emergency Medicine Resident Efficiency and Emergency Department Crowding</title><author>Kirby, Ryan ; Robinson, Richard D. ; Dib, Sasha ; Mclarty, Daisha ; Shaikh, Sajid ; Cheeti, Radhika ; Ho, Amy F. ; Schrader, Chet D. ; Zenarosa, Nestor R. ; Wang, Hao ; Runde, Daniel P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4207-80de3f5af65b000e513a9aa89869dc0b9661521c67a509df9fd564615188b1213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Original Contribution</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirby, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dib, Sasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mclarty, Daisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Sajid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheeti, Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Amy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Chet D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenarosa, Nestor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirby, Ryan</au><au>Robinson, Richard D.</au><au>Dib, Sasha</au><au>Mclarty, Daisha</au><au>Shaikh, Sajid</au><au>Cheeti, Radhika</au><au>Ho, Amy F.</au><au>Schrader, Chet D.</au><au>Zenarosa, Nestor R.</au><au>Wang, Hao</au><au>Runde, Daniel P.</au><au>Runde, Daniel P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergency Medicine Resident Efficiency and Emergency Department Crowding</atitle><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>209-217</pages><issn>2472-5390</issn><eissn>2472-5390</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Provider efficiency has been reported in the literature but there is a lack of efficiency analysis among emergency medicine (EM) residents. We aim to compare efficiency of EM residents of different training levels and determine if EM resident efficiency is affected by emergency department (ED) crowding.
Methods
We conducted a single‐center retrospective observation study from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. The number of new patients per resident per hour and provider‐to‐disposition (PTD) time of each patient were used as resident efficiency markers. A crowding score was assigned to each patient upon the patient's arrival to the ED. We compared efficiency among EM residents of different training levels under different ED crowding statuses. Dynamic efficiency changes were compared monthly through the entire academic year (July to next June).
Results
The study enrolled a total of 150,920 patients. A mean of 1.9 patients/hour was seen by PGY‐1 EM residents in comparison to 2.6 patients/hour by PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. Median PTD was 2.8 hours in PGY‐1 EM residents versus 2.6 hours in PGY‐2 and ‐3 EM residents. There were no significant differences in acuity across all patients seen by EM residents. When crowded conditions existed, residency efficiency increased, but such changes were minimized when the ED became overcrowded. A linear increase of resident efficiency was observed only in PGY‐1 EM residents throughout the entire academic year.
Conclusion
Resident efficiency improved significantly only during their first year of EM training. This efficiency can be affected by ED crowding.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>31360813</pmid><doi>10.1002/aet2.10327</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2472-5390 |
ispartof | AEM education and training, 2019-07, Vol.3 (3), p.209-217 |
issn | 2472-5390 2472-5390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6637007 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original Contribution Original Contributions |
title | Emergency Medicine Resident Efficiency and Emergency Department Crowding |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A07%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergency%20Medicine%20Resident%20Efficiency%20and%20Emergency%20Department%20Crowding&rft.jtitle=AEM%20education%20and%20training&rft.au=Kirby,%20Ryan&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=209-217&rft.issn=2472-5390&rft.eissn=2472-5390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aet2.10327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2267011969%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4207-80de3f5af65b000e513a9aa89869dc0b9661521c67a509df9fd564615188b1213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267011969&rft_id=info:pmid/31360813&rfr_iscdi=true |