Loading…
The Standardized Video Interview: How Does It Affect the Likelihood to Invite for a Residency Interview?
Background The Association of American Medical Colleges instituted a standardized video interview (SVI) for all applicants to emergency medicine (EM). It is unclear how the SVI affects a faculty reviewer's decision on likelihood to invite an applicant (LTI) for an interview. Objectives The obje...
Saved in:
| Published in: | AEM education and training 2019-07, Vol.3 (3), p.226-232 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-dfe042b8a23f65d139b50cfa9ef9a84c233d2a24f6036f116b3ddb3ab8fff0033 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-dfe042b8a23f65d139b50cfa9ef9a84c233d2a24f6036f116b3ddb3ab8fff0033 |
| container_end_page | 232 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 226 |
| container_title | AEM education and training |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Husain, Abbas Li, Ida Ardolic, Brahim Bond, Michael C. Shoenberger, Jan Shah, Kaushal H. Chung, Arlene S. Dermark, Jeffrey Van Bronner, Jonathan M. White, Melissa Taylor, Todd Cygan, Lukasz Caputo, William Silver, Matthew Krauss, William C. Egan, Daniel J. Weizberg, Moshe Runde, Daniel P. |
| description | Background
The Association of American Medical Colleges instituted a standardized video interview (SVI) for all applicants to emergency medicine (EM). It is unclear how the SVI affects a faculty reviewer's decision on likelihood to invite an applicant (LTI) for an interview.
Objectives
The objective was to determine whether the SVI affects the LTI.
Methods
Nine Accreditation Council of Graduate Medication Education (ACGME)‐accredited EM residency programs participated in this prospective, observational study. LTI was defined on a 5‐point Likert scale as follows: 1 = definitely not invite, 2 = likely not invite, 3 = might invite, 4 = probably invite, 5 = definitely invite. LTI was recorded at three instances during each review: 1) after typical screening (blinded to the SVI), 2) after unblinding to the SVI score, and 3) after viewing the SVI video.
Results
Seventeen reviewers at nine ACGME‐accredited residency programs participated. We reviewed 2,219 applications representing 1,424 unique applicants. After unblinding the SVI score, LTI did not change in 2,065 (93.1%), increased in 85 (3.8%) and decreased in 69 (3.1%; p = 0.22). In subgroup analyses, the effect of the SVI on LTI was unchanged by United States Medical Licensing Examination score. However, when examining subgroups of SVI scores, the percentage of applicants in whom the SVI score changed the LTI was significantly different in those that scored in the lower and upper subgroups (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aet2.10331 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6637009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2267011685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-dfe042b8a23f65d139b50cfa9ef9a84c233d2a24f6036f116b3ddb3ab8fff0033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P4zAQhi0EAgRc-AHIR4RUGNtJmnAAVXxWqrTSbper5cRjakhjsN1W5dfjbllgL3uakebxMyO_hBwyOGUA_Exh5KkTgm2QXZ71eS8XFWx-63fIQQhPAMDKLGfAt8mOYKKAkuW7ZDKeIP0VVaeV1_YNNX2wGh0ddhH93OLinN67Bb12GOgw0oEx2EQa06ORfcbWTpzTNK74uY1IjfNU0Z8YkqRrll-ay32yZVQb8OCj7pHftzfjq_ve6Mfd8Gow6jUZB9bTBiHjdam4MEWumajqHBqjKjSVKrOGC6G54pkpQBSGsaIWWtdC1aUxBtI37JGLtfdlVk9RN9hFr1r54u1U-aV0ysp_J52dyEc3l0Uh-gBVEhx_CLx7nWGIcmpDg22rOnSzIDkv-pAWl3lCT9Zo410IHs3nGgZylY5cpSP_pJPgo--HfaJ_s0gAWwML2-LyPyo5uBnztfQdeoCaZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267011685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Standardized Video Interview: How Does It Affect the Likelihood to Invite for a Residency Interview?</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Husain, Abbas ; Li, Ida ; Ardolic, Brahim ; Bond, Michael C. ; Shoenberger, Jan ; Shah, Kaushal H. ; Chung, Arlene S. ; Dermark, Jeffrey Van ; Bronner, Jonathan M. ; White, Melissa ; Taylor, Todd ; Cygan, Lukasz ; Caputo, William ; Silver, Matthew ; Krauss, William C. ; Egan, Daniel J. ; Weizberg, Moshe ; Runde, Daniel P.</creator><contributor>Runde, Daniel P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Husain, Abbas ; Li, Ida ; Ardolic, Brahim ; Bond, Michael C. ; Shoenberger, Jan ; Shah, Kaushal H. ; Chung, Arlene S. ; Dermark, Jeffrey Van ; Bronner, Jonathan M. ; White, Melissa ; Taylor, Todd ; Cygan, Lukasz ; Caputo, William ; Silver, Matthew ; Krauss, William C. ; Egan, Daniel J. ; Weizberg, Moshe ; Runde, Daniel P. ; Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The Association of American Medical Colleges instituted a standardized video interview (SVI) for all applicants to emergency medicine (EM). It is unclear how the SVI affects a faculty reviewer's decision on likelihood to invite an applicant (LTI) for an interview.
Objectives
The objective was to determine whether the SVI affects the LTI.
Methods
Nine Accreditation Council of Graduate Medication Education (ACGME)‐accredited EM residency programs participated in this prospective, observational study. LTI was defined on a 5‐point Likert scale as follows: 1 = definitely not invite, 2 = likely not invite, 3 = might invite, 4 = probably invite, 5 = definitely invite. LTI was recorded at three instances during each review: 1) after typical screening (blinded to the SVI), 2) after unblinding to the SVI score, and 3) after viewing the SVI video.
Results
Seventeen reviewers at nine ACGME‐accredited residency programs participated. We reviewed 2,219 applications representing 1,424 unique applicants. After unblinding the SVI score, LTI did not change in 2,065 (93.1%), increased in 85 (3.8%) and decreased in 69 (3.1%; p = 0.22). In subgroup analyses, the effect of the SVI on LTI was unchanged by United States Medical Licensing Examination score. However, when examining subgroups of SVI scores, the percentage of applicants in whom the SVI score changed the LTI was significantly different in those that scored in the lower and upper subgroups (p < 0.0001). The SVI video was viewed in 816 (36.8%) applications. Watching the video did not change the LTI in 631 (77.3%); LTI increased in 106 (13.0%) and decreased in 79 (9.7%) applications (p = 0.04).
Conclusions
The SVI score changed the LTI in 7% of applications. In this group, the score was equally likely to increase or decrease the LTI. Lower SVI scores were more likely to decrease the LTI than higher scores were to increase the LTI. Watching the SVI video was more likely to increase the LTI than to decrease it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10331</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31360815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Original Contribution ; Original Contributions</subject><ispartof>AEM education and training, 2019-07, Vol.3 (3), p.226-232</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-dfe042b8a23f65d139b50cfa9ef9a84c233d2a24f6036f116b3ddb3ab8fff0033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-dfe042b8a23f65d139b50cfa9ef9a84c233d2a24f6036f116b3ddb3ab8fff0033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637009/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637009/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31360815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Runde, Daniel P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Husain, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardolic, Brahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoenberger, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Kaushal H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Arlene S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dermark, Jeffrey Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronner, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cygan, Lukasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputo, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weizberg, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><title>The Standardized Video Interview: How Does It Affect the Likelihood to Invite for a Residency Interview?</title><title>AEM education and training</title><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><description>Background
The Association of American Medical Colleges instituted a standardized video interview (SVI) for all applicants to emergency medicine (EM). It is unclear how the SVI affects a faculty reviewer's decision on likelihood to invite an applicant (LTI) for an interview.
Objectives
The objective was to determine whether the SVI affects the LTI.
Methods
Nine Accreditation Council of Graduate Medication Education (ACGME)‐accredited EM residency programs participated in this prospective, observational study. LTI was defined on a 5‐point Likert scale as follows: 1 = definitely not invite, 2 = likely not invite, 3 = might invite, 4 = probably invite, 5 = definitely invite. LTI was recorded at three instances during each review: 1) after typical screening (blinded to the SVI), 2) after unblinding to the SVI score, and 3) after viewing the SVI video.
Results
Seventeen reviewers at nine ACGME‐accredited residency programs participated. We reviewed 2,219 applications representing 1,424 unique applicants. After unblinding the SVI score, LTI did not change in 2,065 (93.1%), increased in 85 (3.8%) and decreased in 69 (3.1%; p = 0.22). In subgroup analyses, the effect of the SVI on LTI was unchanged by United States Medical Licensing Examination score. However, when examining subgroups of SVI scores, the percentage of applicants in whom the SVI score changed the LTI was significantly different in those that scored in the lower and upper subgroups (p < 0.0001). The SVI video was viewed in 816 (36.8%) applications. Watching the video did not change the LTI in 631 (77.3%); LTI increased in 106 (13.0%) and decreased in 79 (9.7%) applications (p = 0.04).
Conclusions
The SVI score changed the LTI in 7% of applications. In this group, the score was equally likely to increase or decrease the LTI. Lower SVI scores were more likely to decrease the LTI than higher scores were to increase the LTI. Watching the SVI video was more likely to increase the LTI than to decrease it.</description><subject>Original Contribution</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><issn>2472-5390</issn><issn>2472-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1P4zAQhi0EAgRc-AHIR4RUGNtJmnAAVXxWqrTSbper5cRjakhjsN1W5dfjbllgL3uakebxMyO_hBwyOGUA_Exh5KkTgm2QXZ71eS8XFWx-63fIQQhPAMDKLGfAt8mOYKKAkuW7ZDKeIP0VVaeV1_YNNX2wGh0ddhH93OLinN67Bb12GOgw0oEx2EQa06ORfcbWTpzTNK74uY1IjfNU0Z8YkqRrll-ay32yZVQb8OCj7pHftzfjq_ve6Mfd8Gow6jUZB9bTBiHjdam4MEWumajqHBqjKjSVKrOGC6G54pkpQBSGsaIWWtdC1aUxBtI37JGLtfdlVk9RN9hFr1r54u1U-aV0ysp_J52dyEc3l0Uh-gBVEhx_CLx7nWGIcmpDg22rOnSzIDkv-pAWl3lCT9Zo410IHs3nGgZylY5cpSP_pJPgo--HfaJ_s0gAWwML2-LyPyo5uBnztfQdeoCaZg</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Husain, Abbas</creator><creator>Li, Ida</creator><creator>Ardolic, Brahim</creator><creator>Bond, Michael C.</creator><creator>Shoenberger, Jan</creator><creator>Shah, Kaushal H.</creator><creator>Chung, Arlene S.</creator><creator>Dermark, Jeffrey Van</creator><creator>Bronner, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>White, Melissa</creator><creator>Taylor, Todd</creator><creator>Cygan, Lukasz</creator><creator>Caputo, William</creator><creator>Silver, Matthew</creator><creator>Krauss, William C.</creator><creator>Egan, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Weizberg, Moshe</creator><creator>Runde, Daniel P.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>The Standardized Video Interview: How Does It Affect the Likelihood to Invite for a Residency Interview?</title><author>Husain, Abbas ; Li, Ida ; Ardolic, Brahim ; Bond, Michael C. ; Shoenberger, Jan ; Shah, Kaushal H. ; Chung, Arlene S. ; Dermark, Jeffrey Van ; Bronner, Jonathan M. ; White, Melissa ; Taylor, Todd ; Cygan, Lukasz ; Caputo, William ; Silver, Matthew ; Krauss, William C. ; Egan, Daniel J. ; Weizberg, Moshe ; Runde, Daniel P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-dfe042b8a23f65d139b50cfa9ef9a84c233d2a24f6036f116b3ddb3ab8fff0033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Original Contribution</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Husain, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardolic, Brahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoenberger, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Kaushal H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Arlene S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dermark, Jeffrey Van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronner, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cygan, Lukasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputo, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silver, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krauss, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weizberg, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Husain, Abbas</au><au>Li, Ida</au><au>Ardolic, Brahim</au><au>Bond, Michael C.</au><au>Shoenberger, Jan</au><au>Shah, Kaushal H.</au><au>Chung, Arlene S.</au><au>Dermark, Jeffrey Van</au><au>Bronner, Jonathan M.</au><au>White, Melissa</au><au>Taylor, Todd</au><au>Cygan, Lukasz</au><au>Caputo, William</au><au>Silver, Matthew</au><au>Krauss, William C.</au><au>Egan, Daniel J.</au><au>Weizberg, Moshe</au><au>Runde, Daniel P.</au><au>Runde, Daniel P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Standardized Video Interview: How Does It Affect the Likelihood to Invite for a Residency Interview?</atitle><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>226-232</pages><issn>2472-5390</issn><eissn>2472-5390</eissn><abstract>Background
The Association of American Medical Colleges instituted a standardized video interview (SVI) for all applicants to emergency medicine (EM). It is unclear how the SVI affects a faculty reviewer's decision on likelihood to invite an applicant (LTI) for an interview.
Objectives
The objective was to determine whether the SVI affects the LTI.
Methods
Nine Accreditation Council of Graduate Medication Education (ACGME)‐accredited EM residency programs participated in this prospective, observational study. LTI was defined on a 5‐point Likert scale as follows: 1 = definitely not invite, 2 = likely not invite, 3 = might invite, 4 = probably invite, 5 = definitely invite. LTI was recorded at three instances during each review: 1) after typical screening (blinded to the SVI), 2) after unblinding to the SVI score, and 3) after viewing the SVI video.
Results
Seventeen reviewers at nine ACGME‐accredited residency programs participated. We reviewed 2,219 applications representing 1,424 unique applicants. After unblinding the SVI score, LTI did not change in 2,065 (93.1%), increased in 85 (3.8%) and decreased in 69 (3.1%; p = 0.22). In subgroup analyses, the effect of the SVI on LTI was unchanged by United States Medical Licensing Examination score. However, when examining subgroups of SVI scores, the percentage of applicants in whom the SVI score changed the LTI was significantly different in those that scored in the lower and upper subgroups (p < 0.0001). The SVI video was viewed in 816 (36.8%) applications. Watching the video did not change the LTI in 631 (77.3%); LTI increased in 106 (13.0%) and decreased in 79 (9.7%) applications (p = 0.04).
Conclusions
The SVI score changed the LTI in 7% of applications. In this group, the score was equally likely to increase or decrease the LTI. Lower SVI scores were more likely to decrease the LTI than higher scores were to increase the LTI. Watching the SVI video was more likely to increase the LTI than to decrease it.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>31360815</pmid><doi>10.1002/aet2.10331</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2472-5390 |
| ispartof | AEM education and training, 2019-07, Vol.3 (3), p.226-232 |
| issn | 2472-5390 2472-5390 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6637009 |
| source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Wiley |
| subjects | Original Contribution Original Contributions |
| title | The Standardized Video Interview: How Does It Affect the Likelihood to Invite for a Residency Interview? |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Standardized%20Video%20Interview:%20How%20Does%20It%20Affect%20the%20Likelihood%20to%20Invite%20for%20a%20Residency%20Interview?&rft.jtitle=AEM%20education%20and%20training&rft.au=Husain,%20Abbas&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=226-232&rft.issn=2472-5390&rft.eissn=2472-5390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aet2.10331&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2267011685%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-dfe042b8a23f65d139b50cfa9ef9a84c233d2a24f6036f116b3ddb3ab8fff0033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267011685&rft_id=info:pmid/31360815&rfr_iscdi=true |