Loading…
The misdiagnosis of functional disorders as other neurological conditions
Background Several studies have shown that when patients with functional neurological disorders are followed up, it is rare to find another neurological condition that better explains the initial symptoms in hindsight. No study has examined the reverse, studying patients with a range of neurological...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of neurology 2019-08, Vol.266 (8), p.2018-2026 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6a7c775fb036a09ec230fddf7d7f16bb0ab7fd901cc70f03f7d53aa612b6d4e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6a7c775fb036a09ec230fddf7d7f16bb0ab7fd901cc70f03f7d53aa612b6d4e63 |
container_end_page | 2026 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2018 |
container_title | Journal of neurology |
container_volume | 266 |
creator | Walzl, Dennis Carson, Alan J. Stone, Jon |
description | Background
Several studies have shown that when patients with functional neurological disorders are followed up, it is rare to find another neurological condition that better explains the initial symptoms in hindsight. No study has examined the reverse, studying patients with a range of neurological disease diagnoses with the aim of assessing how often a new diagnosis of functional disorder better explains the original symptoms.
Methods
A prospective multi-centre cohort study of 2637 new neurology outpatient referrals from primary care in Scotland. Neurologists provided initial diagnoses and a rating of the extent to which their symptoms were explained by an ‘organic’ neurological disease. Patients were followed up 19 months later with a questionnaire to their primary care physician asking about diagnostic change, and when indicated also by discussion with the original assessing neurologist and review of secondary care records.
Results
Valid responses were obtained for 2378 out of 2637 patients (90%) with symptoms ‘largely’ or ‘completely’ explained by organic disease at baseline. At follow-up, we found diagnostic errors in 48 patients. Of those, ten (0.4%) had a functional diagnosis and 38 patients (1.6%) had a different ‘organic’ diagnosis which better explained the original symptoms.
Conclusions
Patients diagnosed with neurological disease sometimes have a functional diagnosis at follow-up which, with hindsight, better explains the original symptoms. This occurs at a frequency similar to the misdiagnosis of ‘organic’ neurological disease as functional disorder. Misdiagnosis can harm patients in either direction, especially as we enter an era of evidence-based treatment for functional neurological disorders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00415-019-09356-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6647145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2228414709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6a7c775fb036a09ec230fddf7d7f16bb0ab7fd901cc70f03f7d53aa612b6d4e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOo7-ARdScOOmetOkSbsRZPAFghtdhzSPmUgn0aQV_PdmHN8LV1mc756bew5CBxhOMAA_TQAU1yXgtoSW1KwkG2iCKalKTOt2E02AUChrUtMdtJvSIwA0WdhGOwRjXDPeTNDN_cIUS5e0k3MfkktFsIUdvRpc8LIvtEshahNTIbM0LEwsvBlj6MPcqayr4LVbsWkPbVnZJ7P_8U7Rw-XF_ey6vL27upmd35aKcjqUTHLFeW07IExCa1RFwGptueYWs64D2XGrW8BKcbBAslATKRmuOqapYWSKzta-T2O3NFoZP0TZi6foljK-iiCd-K14txDz8CIYozwHkw2OPwxieB5NGkS-X5m-l96EMYmqIhU0uGlW6NEf9DGMMeeyoqqGYspz8lNUrSkVQ0rR2K_PYBCrpsS6KZGbEu9NCZKHDn-e8TXyWU0GyBpIWfJzE793_2P7BolFoIo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2228414709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The misdiagnosis of functional disorders as other neurological conditions</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Walzl, Dennis ; Carson, Alan J. ; Stone, Jon</creator><creatorcontrib>Walzl, Dennis ; Carson, Alan J. ; Stone, Jon</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Several studies have shown that when patients with functional neurological disorders are followed up, it is rare to find another neurological condition that better explains the initial symptoms in hindsight. No study has examined the reverse, studying patients with a range of neurological disease diagnoses with the aim of assessing how often a new diagnosis of functional disorder better explains the original symptoms.
Methods
A prospective multi-centre cohort study of 2637 new neurology outpatient referrals from primary care in Scotland. Neurologists provided initial diagnoses and a rating of the extent to which their symptoms were explained by an ‘organic’ neurological disease. Patients were followed up 19 months later with a questionnaire to their primary care physician asking about diagnostic change, and when indicated also by discussion with the original assessing neurologist and review of secondary care records.
Results
Valid responses were obtained for 2378 out of 2637 patients (90%) with symptoms ‘largely’ or ‘completely’ explained by organic disease at baseline. At follow-up, we found diagnostic errors in 48 patients. Of those, ten (0.4%) had a functional diagnosis and 38 patients (1.6%) had a different ‘organic’ diagnosis which better explained the original symptoms.
Conclusions
Patients diagnosed with neurological disease sometimes have a functional diagnosis at follow-up which, with hindsight, better explains the original symptoms. This occurs at a frequency similar to the misdiagnosis of ‘organic’ neurological disease as functional disorder. Misdiagnosis can harm patients in either direction, especially as we enter an era of evidence-based treatment for functional neurological disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09356-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31115678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Errors - trends ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis ; Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology ; Neurological diseases ; Neurological disorders ; Neurologists - standards ; Neurologists - trends ; Neurology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosciences ; Original Communication ; Primary care ; Prospective Studies ; Scotland - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurology, 2019-08, Vol.266 (8), p.2018-2026</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Neurology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6a7c775fb036a09ec230fddf7d7f16bb0ab7fd901cc70f03f7d53aa612b6d4e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6a7c775fb036a09ec230fddf7d7f16bb0ab7fd901cc70f03f7d53aa612b6d4e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31115678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walzl, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Jon</creatorcontrib><title>The misdiagnosis of functional disorders as other neurological conditions</title><title>Journal of neurology</title><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><description>Background
Several studies have shown that when patients with functional neurological disorders are followed up, it is rare to find another neurological condition that better explains the initial symptoms in hindsight. No study has examined the reverse, studying patients with a range of neurological disease diagnoses with the aim of assessing how often a new diagnosis of functional disorder better explains the original symptoms.
Methods
A prospective multi-centre cohort study of 2637 new neurology outpatient referrals from primary care in Scotland. Neurologists provided initial diagnoses and a rating of the extent to which their symptoms were explained by an ‘organic’ neurological disease. Patients were followed up 19 months later with a questionnaire to their primary care physician asking about diagnostic change, and when indicated also by discussion with the original assessing neurologist and review of secondary care records.
Results
Valid responses were obtained for 2378 out of 2637 patients (90%) with symptoms ‘largely’ or ‘completely’ explained by organic disease at baseline. At follow-up, we found diagnostic errors in 48 patients. Of those, ten (0.4%) had a functional diagnosis and 38 patients (1.6%) had a different ‘organic’ diagnosis which better explained the original symptoms.
Conclusions
Patients diagnosed with neurological disease sometimes have a functional diagnosis at follow-up which, with hindsight, better explains the original symptoms. This occurs at a frequency similar to the misdiagnosis of ‘organic’ neurological disease as functional disorder. Misdiagnosis can harm patients in either direction, especially as we enter an era of evidence-based treatment for functional neurological disorders.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors - trends</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neurological diseases</subject><subject>Neurological disorders</subject><subject>Neurologists - standards</subject><subject>Neurologists - trends</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Communication</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0340-5354</issn><issn>1432-1459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOo7-ARdScOOmetOkSbsRZPAFghtdhzSPmUgn0aQV_PdmHN8LV1mc756bew5CBxhOMAA_TQAU1yXgtoSW1KwkG2iCKalKTOt2E02AUChrUtMdtJvSIwA0WdhGOwRjXDPeTNDN_cIUS5e0k3MfkktFsIUdvRpc8LIvtEshahNTIbM0LEwsvBlj6MPcqayr4LVbsWkPbVnZJ7P_8U7Rw-XF_ey6vL27upmd35aKcjqUTHLFeW07IExCa1RFwGptueYWs64D2XGrW8BKcbBAslATKRmuOqapYWSKzta-T2O3NFoZP0TZi6foljK-iiCd-K14txDz8CIYozwHkw2OPwxieB5NGkS-X5m-l96EMYmqIhU0uGlW6NEf9DGMMeeyoqqGYspz8lNUrSkVQ0rR2K_PYBCrpsS6KZGbEu9NCZKHDn-e8TXyWU0GyBpIWfJzE793_2P7BolFoIo</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Walzl, Dennis</creator><creator>Carson, Alan J.</creator><creator>Stone, Jon</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>The misdiagnosis of functional disorders as other neurological conditions</title><author>Walzl, Dennis ; Carson, Alan J. ; Stone, Jon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6a7c775fb036a09ec230fddf7d7f16bb0ab7fd901cc70f03f7d53aa612b6d4e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors - trends</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neurological diseases</topic><topic>Neurological disorders</topic><topic>Neurologists - standards</topic><topic>Neurologists - trends</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Communication</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walzl, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Jon</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walzl, Dennis</au><au>Carson, Alan J.</au><au>Stone, Jon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The misdiagnosis of functional disorders as other neurological conditions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>266</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2018</spage><epage>2026</epage><pages>2018-2026</pages><issn>0340-5354</issn><eissn>1432-1459</eissn><abstract>Background
Several studies have shown that when patients with functional neurological disorders are followed up, it is rare to find another neurological condition that better explains the initial symptoms in hindsight. No study has examined the reverse, studying patients with a range of neurological disease diagnoses with the aim of assessing how often a new diagnosis of functional disorder better explains the original symptoms.
Methods
A prospective multi-centre cohort study of 2637 new neurology outpatient referrals from primary care in Scotland. Neurologists provided initial diagnoses and a rating of the extent to which their symptoms were explained by an ‘organic’ neurological disease. Patients were followed up 19 months later with a questionnaire to their primary care physician asking about diagnostic change, and when indicated also by discussion with the original assessing neurologist and review of secondary care records.
Results
Valid responses were obtained for 2378 out of 2637 patients (90%) with symptoms ‘largely’ or ‘completely’ explained by organic disease at baseline. At follow-up, we found diagnostic errors in 48 patients. Of those, ten (0.4%) had a functional diagnosis and 38 patients (1.6%) had a different ‘organic’ diagnosis which better explained the original symptoms.
Conclusions
Patients diagnosed with neurological disease sometimes have a functional diagnosis at follow-up which, with hindsight, better explains the original symptoms. This occurs at a frequency similar to the misdiagnosis of ‘organic’ neurological disease as functional disorder. Misdiagnosis can harm patients in either direction, especially as we enter an era of evidence-based treatment for functional neurological disorders.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31115678</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00415-019-09356-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5354 |
ispartof | Journal of neurology, 2019-08, Vol.266 (8), p.2018-2026 |
issn | 0340-5354 1432-1459 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6647145 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Cohort Studies Diagnosis Diagnostic Errors - trends Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology Neurological diseases Neurological disorders Neurologists - standards Neurologists - trends Neurology Neuroradiology Neurosciences Original Communication Primary care Prospective Studies Scotland - epidemiology Young Adult |
title | The misdiagnosis of functional disorders as other neurological conditions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A48%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20misdiagnosis%20of%20functional%20disorders%20as%20other%20neurological%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Walzl,%20Dennis&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=266&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2018&rft.epage=2026&rft.pages=2018-2026&rft.issn=0340-5354&rft.eissn=1432-1459&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00415-019-09356-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2228414709%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6a7c775fb036a09ec230fddf7d7f16bb0ab7fd901cc70f03f7d53aa612b6d4e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2228414709&rft_id=info:pmid/31115678&rfr_iscdi=true |