Loading…

Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils

Evolutionary ecologists have shown that relatives are important providers of support across many species. Among humans, cultural reckonings of kinship are more than just relatedness, as they interact with systems of descent, inheritance, marriage and residence. These cultural aspects of kinship may...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2019-09, Vol.374 (1780), p.20180070-20180070
Main Authors: Power, Eleanor A, Ready, Elspeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-ccdc472944f78a83c11944cb7f9c5b366302ddbb61300ccede1b3b42eae94f0c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-ccdc472944f78a83c11944cb7f9c5b366302ddbb61300ccede1b3b42eae94f0c3
container_end_page 20180070
container_issue 1780
container_start_page 20180070
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 374
creator Power, Eleanor A
Ready, Elspeth
description Evolutionary ecologists have shown that relatives are important providers of support across many species. Among humans, cultural reckonings of kinship are more than just relatedness, as they interact with systems of descent, inheritance, marriage and residence. These cultural aspects of kinship may be particularly important when a person is determining which kin, if any, to call upon for help. Here, we explore the relationship between kinship and cooperation by drawing upon social support network data from two villages in South India. While these Tamil villages have a nominally male-biased kinship system (being patrilocal and patrilineal), matrilateral kin play essential social roles and many women reside in their natal villages, letting us tease apart the relative importance of genetic relatedness, kinship and residence in accessing social support. We find that people often name both their consanguineal and affinal kin as providing them with support, and we see some weakening of support with lesser relatedness. Matrilateral and patrilateral relatives are roughly equally likely to be named, and the greatest distinction instead is in their availability, which is highly contingent on post-marital residence patterns. People residing in their natal village have many more consanguineal relatives present than those who have relocated. Still, relocation has only a small effect on an individual's network size, as non-natal residents are more reliant on the few kin that they have present, most of whom are affines. In sum, marriage patterns have an important impact on kin availability, but the flexibility offered by the broadening of the concept of kin helps people develop the cooperative relationships that they rely upon, even in the absence of genetic relatives. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2018.0070
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6664129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2258158632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-ccdc472944f78a83c11944cb7f9c5b366302ddbb61300ccede1b3b42eae94f0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctv1DAQxi0EokvhyhH5yIEsfsWJOSChFZRKlTi0PVt-TLaGxA62g7T968nSh-hpRprv-2ZGP4TeUrKlRPUfc6l2ywjtt4R05BnaUNHRhqmOPEcboiRresHlCXpVyk9CiGo78RKdcMoJp1Ju0O0upRmyqSFFbOGQoscuxWLifgkx1MMnPKdSm8nkUM2IM5TgITr4gD2MIcI_Z8FpwL9CxGa1l-TCqizLPKdcsZlS3OPLtNQbfB59MBFfmSmM5TV6MZixwJv7eoquv3292n1vLn6cne--XDSu5ao2znknOqaEGLre9NxRuvbOdoNyreVScsK8t1auPxHnwAO13AoGBpQYiOOn6PNd7rzYCbyDWLMZ9ZzD-tRBJxP000kMN3qf_mgppaBMrQHv7wNy-r1AqXoKxcE4mghpKZqxtqdtLzlbpds7qcuplAzD4xpK9BGYPgLTR2D6CGw1vPv_uEf5AyH-F7aMlmY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258158632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Power, Eleanor A ; Ready, Elspeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Power, Eleanor A ; Ready, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><description>Evolutionary ecologists have shown that relatives are important providers of support across many species. Among humans, cultural reckonings of kinship are more than just relatedness, as they interact with systems of descent, inheritance, marriage and residence. These cultural aspects of kinship may be particularly important when a person is determining which kin, if any, to call upon for help. Here, we explore the relationship between kinship and cooperation by drawing upon social support network data from two villages in South India. While these Tamil villages have a nominally male-biased kinship system (being patrilocal and patrilineal), matrilateral kin play essential social roles and many women reside in their natal villages, letting us tease apart the relative importance of genetic relatedness, kinship and residence in accessing social support. We find that people often name both their consanguineal and affinal kin as providing them with support, and we see some weakening of support with lesser relatedness. Matrilateral and patrilateral relatives are roughly equally likely to be named, and the greatest distinction instead is in their availability, which is highly contingent on post-marital residence patterns. People residing in their natal village have many more consanguineal relatives present than those who have relocated. Still, relocation has only a small effect on an individual's network size, as non-natal residents are more reliant on the few kin that they have present, most of whom are affines. In sum, marriage patterns have an important impact on kin availability, but the flexibility offered by the broadening of the concept of kin helps people develop the cooperative relationships that they rely upon, even in the absence of genetic relatives. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31303166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Consanguinity ; Cooperative Behavior ; Family ; Family Relations ; Female ; Humans ; India ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Marriage - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Rural Population ; Social Behavior ; Social Support ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2019-09, Vol.374 (1780), p.20180070-20180070</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-ccdc472944f78a83c11944cb7f9c5b366302ddbb61300ccede1b3b42eae94f0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-ccdc472944f78a83c11944cb7f9c5b366302ddbb61300ccede1b3b42eae94f0c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8473-5826 ; 0000-0002-3064-2050</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664129/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6664129/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Power, Eleanor A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ready, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><title>Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Evolutionary ecologists have shown that relatives are important providers of support across many species. Among humans, cultural reckonings of kinship are more than just relatedness, as they interact with systems of descent, inheritance, marriage and residence. These cultural aspects of kinship may be particularly important when a person is determining which kin, if any, to call upon for help. Here, we explore the relationship between kinship and cooperation by drawing upon social support network data from two villages in South India. While these Tamil villages have a nominally male-biased kinship system (being patrilocal and patrilineal), matrilateral kin play essential social roles and many women reside in their natal villages, letting us tease apart the relative importance of genetic relatedness, kinship and residence in accessing social support. We find that people often name both their consanguineal and affinal kin as providing them with support, and we see some weakening of support with lesser relatedness. Matrilateral and patrilateral relatives are roughly equally likely to be named, and the greatest distinction instead is in their availability, which is highly contingent on post-marital residence patterns. People residing in their natal village have many more consanguineal relatives present than those who have relocated. Still, relocation has only a small effect on an individual's network size, as non-natal residents are more reliant on the few kin that they have present, most of whom are affines. In sum, marriage patterns have an important impact on kin availability, but the flexibility offered by the broadening of the concept of kin helps people develop the cooperative relationships that they rely upon, even in the absence of genetic relatives. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Consanguinity</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkctv1DAQxi0EokvhyhH5yIEsfsWJOSChFZRKlTi0PVt-TLaGxA62g7T968nSh-hpRprv-2ZGP4TeUrKlRPUfc6l2ywjtt4R05BnaUNHRhqmOPEcboiRresHlCXpVyk9CiGo78RKdcMoJp1Ju0O0upRmyqSFFbOGQoscuxWLifgkx1MMnPKdSm8nkUM2IM5TgITr4gD2MIcI_Z8FpwL9CxGa1l-TCqizLPKdcsZlS3OPLtNQbfB59MBFfmSmM5TV6MZixwJv7eoquv3292n1vLn6cne--XDSu5ao2znknOqaEGLre9NxRuvbOdoNyreVScsK8t1auPxHnwAO13AoGBpQYiOOn6PNd7rzYCbyDWLMZ9ZzD-tRBJxP000kMN3qf_mgppaBMrQHv7wNy-r1AqXoKxcE4mghpKZqxtqdtLzlbpds7qcuplAzD4xpK9BGYPgLTR2D6CGw1vPv_uEf5AyH-F7aMlmY</recordid><startdate>20190902</startdate><enddate>20190902</enddate><creator>Power, Eleanor A</creator><creator>Ready, Elspeth</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8473-5826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3064-2050</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190902</creationdate><title>Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils</title><author>Power, Eleanor A ; Ready, Elspeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-ccdc472944f78a83c11944cb7f9c5b366302ddbb61300ccede1b3b42eae94f0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Consanguinity</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Power, Eleanor A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ready, Elspeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Power, Eleanor A</au><au>Ready, Elspeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2019-09-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>374</volume><issue>1780</issue><spage>20180070</spage><epage>20180070</epage><pages>20180070-20180070</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Evolutionary ecologists have shown that relatives are important providers of support across many species. Among humans, cultural reckonings of kinship are more than just relatedness, as they interact with systems of descent, inheritance, marriage and residence. These cultural aspects of kinship may be particularly important when a person is determining which kin, if any, to call upon for help. Here, we explore the relationship between kinship and cooperation by drawing upon social support network data from two villages in South India. While these Tamil villages have a nominally male-biased kinship system (being patrilocal and patrilineal), matrilateral kin play essential social roles and many women reside in their natal villages, letting us tease apart the relative importance of genetic relatedness, kinship and residence in accessing social support. We find that people often name both their consanguineal and affinal kin as providing them with support, and we see some weakening of support with lesser relatedness. Matrilateral and patrilateral relatives are roughly equally likely to be named, and the greatest distinction instead is in their availability, which is highly contingent on post-marital residence patterns. People residing in their natal village have many more consanguineal relatives present than those who have relocated. Still, relocation has only a small effect on an individual's network size, as non-natal residents are more reliant on the few kin that they have present, most of whom are affines. In sum, marriage patterns have an important impact on kin availability, but the flexibility offered by the broadening of the concept of kin helps people develop the cooperative relationships that they rely upon, even in the absence of genetic relatives. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>31303166</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2018.0070</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8473-5826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3064-2050</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2019-09, Vol.374 (1780), p.20180070-20180070
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6664129
source Open Access: PubMed Central; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Adult
Consanguinity
Cooperative Behavior
Family
Family Relations
Female
Humans
India
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Marriage - psychology
Middle Aged
Rural Population
Social Behavior
Social Support
Young Adult
title Cooperation beyond consanguinity: post-marital residence, delineations of kin and social support among South Indian Tamils
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooperation%20beyond%20consanguinity:%20post-marital%20residence,%20delineations%20of%20kin%20and%20social%20support%20among%20South%20Indian%20Tamils&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Power,%20Eleanor%20A&rft.date=2019-09-02&rft.volume=374&rft.issue=1780&rft.spage=20180070&rft.epage=20180070&rft.pages=20180070-20180070&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2018.0070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2258158632%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-ccdc472944f78a83c11944cb7f9c5b366302ddbb61300ccede1b3b42eae94f0c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258158632&rft_id=info:pmid/31303166&rfr_iscdi=true