Loading…

Variability in Baseball Throwing Metrics During A Structured Long-toss Program: Does One Size Fit All?

Objectives: The variability of throwing metrics, particularly elbow torque and ball velocity, during structured long-toss programs is yet to be fully elucidated. The primary aims of this study were to assess various throwing metrics through a structured long-toss program using wearable technology an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2019-07, Vol.7 (7_suppl5)
Main Authors: Leafblad, Nels, Larson, Dirk, Fleisig, Glenn S., Conte, Stan, Fealy, Stephen, Dines, Joshua, D’Angelo, John, Camp, Christopher L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 7_suppl5
container_start_page
container_title Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
container_volume 7
creator Leafblad, Nels
Larson, Dirk
Fleisig, Glenn S.
Conte, Stan
Fealy, Stephen
Dines, Joshua
D’Angelo, John
Camp, Christopher L.
description Objectives: The variability of throwing metrics, particularly elbow torque and ball velocity, during structured long-toss programs is yet to be fully elucidated. The primary aims of this study were to assess various throwing metrics through a structured long-toss program using wearable technology and to quantify the intra and inter thrower variability of these metrics at each stage of throwing. Methods: This was a descriptive laboratory study in which 60 high school and collegiate pitchers participated in a predetermined, structured, progressive long-toss program. All players wore a motusBASEBALL sleeve (Motus Global, Inc.; Rockville Centre, NY), which measured arm slot, arm velocity, shoulder rotation, and elbow varus torque. Radar guns were used to measure ball velocity. These metrics were compared within and between all pitchers at each of the following throwing distances: 90 ft, 120 ft, 150 ft, 180 ft, and maximum effort mound pitching. Intra- and inter- thrower reliabilities were calculated for each throwing metric at every stage of the program. Excellent intra-thrower reliability was defined by an Intra-class coefficient (ICC) >0.750. Acceptable inter-thrower reliability was defined by a Coefficient of Variation (CV)
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2325967119S00394
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6667850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2325967119S00394</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2375743432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-e8ccdf25315598d507c025ddf86d1282be8f3da921f423d0cbb359b0fb5516583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtLAzEQDqJgqb17DHhezWOzDw9Kba0KlQqtXkM2yW5Ttpua7Cr117tLiy9wLvP6vm9mGABOMTrHOI4vCCUsjWKM0zlCNA0PQK8rBV3t8Ed8DAber1BrCcMpjXsgfxHOiMyUpt5CU8Eb4XUmyhIuls6-m6qAj7p2Rno4blyXDuG8do2sG6cVnNqqCGrrPXxytnBifQnHVns4qzScmw8NJ6aGw7K8PgFHuSi9Hux9HzxPbhej-2A6u3sYDaeBJCgMA51IqXLCKGYsTRRDsUSEKZUnkcIkIZlOcqpESnAeEqqQzDLK0gzlGWM4Ygntg6ud7qbJ1lpJXdVOlHzjzFq4LbfC8N-dyix5Yd94FEVxwlArcLYXcPa10b7mK9u4qt2ZExqzOKQhJS0K7VDStcc7nX9NwIh3H-F_P9JSgh3Fi0J_i_6L_wSrVIsv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375743432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability in Baseball Throwing Metrics During A Structured Long-toss Program: Does One Size Fit All?</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Leafblad, Nels ; Larson, Dirk ; Fleisig, Glenn S. ; Conte, Stan ; Fealy, Stephen ; Dines, Joshua ; D’Angelo, John ; Camp, Christopher L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leafblad, Nels ; Larson, Dirk ; Fleisig, Glenn S. ; Conte, Stan ; Fealy, Stephen ; Dines, Joshua ; D’Angelo, John ; Camp, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The variability of throwing metrics, particularly elbow torque and ball velocity, during structured long-toss programs is yet to be fully elucidated. The primary aims of this study were to assess various throwing metrics through a structured long-toss program using wearable technology and to quantify the intra and inter thrower variability of these metrics at each stage of throwing. Methods: This was a descriptive laboratory study in which 60 high school and collegiate pitchers participated in a predetermined, structured, progressive long-toss program. All players wore a motusBASEBALL sleeve (Motus Global, Inc.; Rockville Centre, NY), which measured arm slot, arm velocity, shoulder rotation, and elbow varus torque. Radar guns were used to measure ball velocity. These metrics were compared within and between all pitchers at each of the following throwing distances: 90 ft, 120 ft, 150 ft, 180 ft, and maximum effort mound pitching. Intra- and inter- thrower reliabilities were calculated for each throwing metric at every stage of the program. Excellent intra-thrower reliability was defined by an Intra-class coefficient (ICC) &gt;0.750. Acceptable inter-thrower reliability was defined by a Coefficient of Variation (CV) &lt;5%. Results: Ball velocity significantly changed at each progressive throwing distance, but this did not consistently correlate with an increase in elbow torque. Pitching from the mound did not place more torque on the elbow than throwing from 120 ft and beyond. Intra-thrower reliability was excellent throughout the progressive long-toss program for each throwing metric. Ninety-one percent of throwers had acceptable inter-thrower reliability for ball velocity, whereas only 79% of throwers had acceptable inter-thrower reliability for elbow torque. Conclusion: Based on trends in elbow torque, it may be practical to incorporate pitching from the mound earlier in the program (once a player is comfortable throwing from 120 ft). Ball velocity and elbow torque do not necessarily correlate with one another, so a degree of caution should be exercised when using radar guns to estimate elbow torque. Given the variability in elbow torque between throwers, some athletes would likely benefit from an individualized throwing program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967119S00394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Elbow ; Orthopedics ; Sports medicine ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2019-07, Vol.7 (7_suppl5)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019 2019 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667850/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2375743432?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,25753,27853,27924,27925,37012,44590,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leafblad, Nels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleisig, Glenn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conte, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fealy, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dines, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Angelo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camp, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><title>Variability in Baseball Throwing Metrics During A Structured Long-toss Program: Does One Size Fit All?</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><description>Objectives: The variability of throwing metrics, particularly elbow torque and ball velocity, during structured long-toss programs is yet to be fully elucidated. The primary aims of this study were to assess various throwing metrics through a structured long-toss program using wearable technology and to quantify the intra and inter thrower variability of these metrics at each stage of throwing. Methods: This was a descriptive laboratory study in which 60 high school and collegiate pitchers participated in a predetermined, structured, progressive long-toss program. All players wore a motusBASEBALL sleeve (Motus Global, Inc.; Rockville Centre, NY), which measured arm slot, arm velocity, shoulder rotation, and elbow varus torque. Radar guns were used to measure ball velocity. These metrics were compared within and between all pitchers at each of the following throwing distances: 90 ft, 120 ft, 150 ft, 180 ft, and maximum effort mound pitching. Intra- and inter- thrower reliabilities were calculated for each throwing metric at every stage of the program. Excellent intra-thrower reliability was defined by an Intra-class coefficient (ICC) &gt;0.750. Acceptable inter-thrower reliability was defined by a Coefficient of Variation (CV) &lt;5%. Results: Ball velocity significantly changed at each progressive throwing distance, but this did not consistently correlate with an increase in elbow torque. Pitching from the mound did not place more torque on the elbow than throwing from 120 ft and beyond. Intra-thrower reliability was excellent throughout the progressive long-toss program for each throwing metric. Ninety-one percent of throwers had acceptable inter-thrower reliability for ball velocity, whereas only 79% of throwers had acceptable inter-thrower reliability for elbow torque. Conclusion: Based on trends in elbow torque, it may be practical to incorporate pitching from the mound earlier in the program (once a player is comfortable throwing from 120 ft). Ball velocity and elbow torque do not necessarily correlate with one another, so a degree of caution should be exercised when using radar guns to estimate elbow torque. Given the variability in elbow torque between throwers, some athletes would likely benefit from an individualized throwing program.</description><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UUtLAzEQDqJgqb17DHhezWOzDw9Kba0KlQqtXkM2yW5Ttpua7Cr117tLiy9wLvP6vm9mGABOMTrHOI4vCCUsjWKM0zlCNA0PQK8rBV3t8Ed8DAber1BrCcMpjXsgfxHOiMyUpt5CU8Eb4XUmyhIuls6-m6qAj7p2Rno4blyXDuG8do2sG6cVnNqqCGrrPXxytnBifQnHVns4qzScmw8NJ6aGw7K8PgFHuSi9Hux9HzxPbhej-2A6u3sYDaeBJCgMA51IqXLCKGYsTRRDsUSEKZUnkcIkIZlOcqpESnAeEqqQzDLK0gzlGWM4Ygntg6ud7qbJ1lpJXdVOlHzjzFq4LbfC8N-dyix5Yd94FEVxwlArcLYXcPa10b7mK9u4qt2ZExqzOKQhJS0K7VDStcc7nX9NwIh3H-F_P9JSgh3Fi0J_i_6L_wSrVIsv</recordid><startdate>20190729</startdate><enddate>20190729</enddate><creator>Leafblad, Nels</creator><creator>Larson, Dirk</creator><creator>Fleisig, Glenn S.</creator><creator>Conte, Stan</creator><creator>Fealy, Stephen</creator><creator>Dines, Joshua</creator><creator>D’Angelo, John</creator><creator>Camp, Christopher L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190729</creationdate><title>Variability in Baseball Throwing Metrics During A Structured Long-toss Program: Does One Size Fit All?</title><author>Leafblad, Nels ; Larson, Dirk ; Fleisig, Glenn S. ; Conte, Stan ; Fealy, Stephen ; Dines, Joshua ; D’Angelo, John ; Camp, Christopher L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-e8ccdf25315598d507c025ddf86d1282be8f3da921f423d0cbb359b0fb5516583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leafblad, Nels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleisig, Glenn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conte, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fealy, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dines, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Angelo, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camp, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leafblad, Nels</au><au>Larson, Dirk</au><au>Fleisig, Glenn S.</au><au>Conte, Stan</au><au>Fealy, Stephen</au><au>Dines, Joshua</au><au>D’Angelo, John</au><au>Camp, Christopher L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability in Baseball Throwing Metrics During A Structured Long-toss Program: Does One Size Fit All?</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2019-07-29</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>7_suppl5</issue><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The variability of throwing metrics, particularly elbow torque and ball velocity, during structured long-toss programs is yet to be fully elucidated. The primary aims of this study were to assess various throwing metrics through a structured long-toss program using wearable technology and to quantify the intra and inter thrower variability of these metrics at each stage of throwing. Methods: This was a descriptive laboratory study in which 60 high school and collegiate pitchers participated in a predetermined, structured, progressive long-toss program. All players wore a motusBASEBALL sleeve (Motus Global, Inc.; Rockville Centre, NY), which measured arm slot, arm velocity, shoulder rotation, and elbow varus torque. Radar guns were used to measure ball velocity. These metrics were compared within and between all pitchers at each of the following throwing distances: 90 ft, 120 ft, 150 ft, 180 ft, and maximum effort mound pitching. Intra- and inter- thrower reliabilities were calculated for each throwing metric at every stage of the program. Excellent intra-thrower reliability was defined by an Intra-class coefficient (ICC) &gt;0.750. Acceptable inter-thrower reliability was defined by a Coefficient of Variation (CV) &lt;5%. Results: Ball velocity significantly changed at each progressive throwing distance, but this did not consistently correlate with an increase in elbow torque. Pitching from the mound did not place more torque on the elbow than throwing from 120 ft and beyond. Intra-thrower reliability was excellent throughout the progressive long-toss program for each throwing metric. Ninety-one percent of throwers had acceptable inter-thrower reliability for ball velocity, whereas only 79% of throwers had acceptable inter-thrower reliability for elbow torque. Conclusion: Based on trends in elbow torque, it may be practical to incorporate pitching from the mound earlier in the program (once a player is comfortable throwing from 120 ft). Ball velocity and elbow torque do not necessarily correlate with one another, so a degree of caution should be exercised when using radar guns to estimate elbow torque. Given the variability in elbow torque between throwers, some athletes would likely benefit from an individualized throwing program.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2325967119S00394</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2325-9671
ispartof Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2019-07, Vol.7 (7_suppl5)
issn 2325-9671
2325-9671
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6667850
source SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Elbow
Orthopedics
Sports medicine
Velocity
title Variability in Baseball Throwing Metrics During A Structured Long-toss Program: Does One Size Fit All?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A30%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20in%20Baseball%20Throwing%20Metrics%20During%20A%20Structured%20Long-toss%20Program:%20Does%20One%20Size%20Fit%20All?&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Leafblad,%20Nels&rft.date=2019-07-29&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=7_suppl5&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967119S00394&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2375743432%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2044-e8ccdf25315598d507c025ddf86d1282be8f3da921f423d0cbb359b0fb5516583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375743432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2325967119S00394&rfr_iscdi=true