Loading…

Comparative metagenomic sequencing analysis of cecum microbiotal diversity and function in broilers and layers

The composition of the gastrointestinal microorganisms in poultry is closely associated with the host and its environment. In this study, using 16S rRNA and metagenomic techniques, we comprehensively analyzed the structure and diversity of the cecal microbiota of broiler chickens (BC) and laying hen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:3 Biotech 2019-08, Vol.9 (8), p.316-10, Article 316
Main Authors: Qi, Zhao, Shi, Shuiqin, Tu, Jian, Li, Shaowen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f39fe9569a44b278bc790e1a271659df3880d9fbdba3b41a2c2288c8c12695223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f39fe9569a44b278bc790e1a271659df3880d9fbdba3b41a2c2288c8c12695223
container_end_page 10
container_issue 8
container_start_page 316
container_title 3 Biotech
container_volume 9
creator Qi, Zhao
Shi, Shuiqin
Tu, Jian
Li, Shaowen
description The composition of the gastrointestinal microorganisms in poultry is closely associated with the host and its environment. In this study, using 16S rRNA and metagenomic techniques, we comprehensively analyzed the structure and diversity of the cecal microbiota of broiler chickens (BC) and laying hens (LH). The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis showed Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the main cecal bacterial phyla in BC and LH. However, at the genus level, LH had a greater abundance of Bacteroides ( P 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13205-019-1834-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6669222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2267435999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f39fe9569a44b278bc790e1a271659df3880d9fbdba3b41a2c2288c8c12695223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLJDEUhYM4qPT4A2YjATduSvOoSiUbQRp1BMHNDMwupFKpNlKVtEmV0P_e23ZP-wCzySXnuyfJPQj9ouScElJfZMoZqQpCVUElLwu6h44YVaSoai73dzX7d4iOc34isCpaKUoO0CGnJRGCyyMU5nFYmmRG_-Lw4EazcCEO3uLsnicXrA8LbILpV9lnHDtsnZ0GDECKjY-j6XELnSn7cQVci7sp2NHHgH3ATYq-B-1N6M0Kyp_oR2f67I63-wz9vbn-M_9d3D_c3s2v7gtb1mQsOq46pyqhTFk2rJaNrRVx1LCaikq1HZeStKpr2sbwpoRzy5iUVlrKhKoY4zN0ufFdTs3gWuvCmEyvl8kPJq10NF5_VoJ_1Iv4ooUQir0ZnG0NUoRB5FEPPlvX9ya4OGXNWM1gzoRxQE-_oE9xSjCzNSXqkldKKaDohoLJ5Zxct3sMJXodqN4EqiFQvQ5UU-g5-fiLXcf_-ABgGyCDFBYuvV_9vesrnlKtjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267435999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative metagenomic sequencing analysis of cecum microbiotal diversity and function in broilers and layers</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Qi, Zhao ; Shi, Shuiqin ; Tu, Jian ; Li, Shaowen</creator><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhao ; Shi, Shuiqin ; Tu, Jian ; Li, Shaowen</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The composition of the gastrointestinal microorganisms in poultry is closely associated with the host and its environment. In this study, using 16S rRNA and metagenomic techniques, we comprehensively analyzed the structure and diversity of the cecal microbiota of broiler chickens (BC) and laying hens (LH). The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis showed Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the main cecal bacterial phyla in BC and LH. However, at the genus level, LH had a greater abundance of Bacteroides ( P  < 0.05), Rikenellaceae _RC9_gut_group ( P  < 0.01), Phascolarctobacterium ( P  < 0.05), Desulfovibrio ( P  < 0.05), Prevotellaceae _UCG-001 ( P  < 0.05), and unclassified_o_ Bacteroidales ( P  < 0.05), whereas BC had a greater abundance of Alistipes ( P  < 0.05), Rikenella ( P  < 0.05), Ruminococcaceae _UCG-005 ( P  < 0.05), Lachnoclostridium ( P  < 0.05), and unclassified_f_ Ruminococcaceae ( P  < 0.05). It is particularly noteworthy that the genus Desulfovibrio was significantly more abundant in the LH cecum than in the BC cecum ( P  < 0.05). A metagenomic analysis showed that the annotations in the LH dataset were significantly more abundant than in the BC dataset, and included replication, recombination and repair, energy production and transformation, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis, and amino acid transport and metabolism-related functions ( P  < 0.05). This study indicates that microbial genotypic differences in chickens of the same species can cause changes in the abundances of the gut microbiota, but do not alter the structural composition or major functional characteristics of the gut microbiota.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-572X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-5738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13205-019-1834-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31406638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agriculture ; Amino acids ; Annotations ; Bioinformatics ; Biomaterials ; Biotechnology ; Cancer Research ; Cecum ; Cell walls ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chickens ; Composition ; Datasets ; Desulfovibrio ; Digestive system ; Gastrointestinal tract ; Genetic transformation ; Intestinal microflora ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Original ; Original Article ; Poultry ; Recombination ; rRNA 16S ; Ruminococcaceae ; Sequences ; Stem Cells</subject><ispartof>3 Biotech, 2019-08, Vol.9 (8), p.316-10, Article 316</ispartof><rights>King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f39fe9569a44b278bc790e1a271659df3880d9fbdba3b41a2c2288c8c12695223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f39fe9569a44b278bc790e1a271659df3880d9fbdba3b41a2c2288c8c12695223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669222/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669222/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Shuiqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shaowen</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative metagenomic sequencing analysis of cecum microbiotal diversity and function in broilers and layers</title><title>3 Biotech</title><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The composition of the gastrointestinal microorganisms in poultry is closely associated with the host and its environment. In this study, using 16S rRNA and metagenomic techniques, we comprehensively analyzed the structure and diversity of the cecal microbiota of broiler chickens (BC) and laying hens (LH). The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis showed Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the main cecal bacterial phyla in BC and LH. However, at the genus level, LH had a greater abundance of Bacteroides ( P  < 0.05), Rikenellaceae _RC9_gut_group ( P  < 0.01), Phascolarctobacterium ( P  < 0.05), Desulfovibrio ( P  < 0.05), Prevotellaceae _UCG-001 ( P  < 0.05), and unclassified_o_ Bacteroidales ( P  < 0.05), whereas BC had a greater abundance of Alistipes ( P  < 0.05), Rikenella ( P  < 0.05), Ruminococcaceae _UCG-005 ( P  < 0.05), Lachnoclostridium ( P  < 0.05), and unclassified_f_ Ruminococcaceae ( P  < 0.05). It is particularly noteworthy that the genus Desulfovibrio was significantly more abundant in the LH cecum than in the BC cecum ( P  < 0.05). A metagenomic analysis showed that the annotations in the LH dataset were significantly more abundant than in the BC dataset, and included replication, recombination and repair, energy production and transformation, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis, and amino acid transport and metabolism-related functions ( P  < 0.05). This study indicates that microbial genotypic differences in chickens of the same species can cause changes in the abundances of the gut microbiota, but do not alter the structural composition or major functional characteristics of the gut microbiota.]]></description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Annotations</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cecum</subject><subject>Cell walls</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Desulfovibrio</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal tract</subject><subject>Genetic transformation</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Recombination</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Ruminococcaceae</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><issn>2190-572X</issn><issn>2190-5738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtLJDEUhYM4qPT4A2YjATduSvOoSiUbQRp1BMHNDMwupFKpNlKVtEmV0P_e23ZP-wCzySXnuyfJPQj9ouScElJfZMoZqQpCVUElLwu6h44YVaSoai73dzX7d4iOc34isCpaKUoO0CGnJRGCyyMU5nFYmmRG_-Lw4EazcCEO3uLsnicXrA8LbILpV9lnHDtsnZ0GDECKjY-j6XELnSn7cQVci7sp2NHHgH3ATYq-B-1N6M0Kyp_oR2f67I63-wz9vbn-M_9d3D_c3s2v7gtb1mQsOq46pyqhTFk2rJaNrRVx1LCaikq1HZeStKpr2sbwpoRzy5iUVlrKhKoY4zN0ufFdTs3gWuvCmEyvl8kPJq10NF5_VoJ_1Iv4ooUQir0ZnG0NUoRB5FEPPlvX9ya4OGXNWM1gzoRxQE-_oE9xSjCzNSXqkldKKaDohoLJ5Zxct3sMJXodqN4EqiFQvQ5UU-g5-fiLXcf_-ABgGyCDFBYuvV_9vesrnlKtjQ</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Qi, Zhao</creator><creator>Shi, Shuiqin</creator><creator>Tu, Jian</creator><creator>Li, Shaowen</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Comparative metagenomic sequencing analysis of cecum microbiotal diversity and function in broilers and layers</title><author>Qi, Zhao ; Shi, Shuiqin ; Tu, Jian ; Li, Shaowen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f39fe9569a44b278bc790e1a271659df3880d9fbdba3b41a2c2288c8c12695223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Annotations</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cecum</topic><topic>Cell walls</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Desulfovibrio</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal tract</topic><topic>Genetic transformation</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Recombination</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Ruminococcaceae</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Shuiqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shaowen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>3 Biotech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qi, Zhao</au><au>Shi, Shuiqin</au><au>Tu, Jian</au><au>Li, Shaowen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative metagenomic sequencing analysis of cecum microbiotal diversity and function in broilers and layers</atitle><jtitle>3 Biotech</jtitle><stitle>3 Biotech</stitle><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>316-10</pages><artnum>316</artnum><issn>2190-572X</issn><eissn>2190-5738</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The composition of the gastrointestinal microorganisms in poultry is closely associated with the host and its environment. In this study, using 16S rRNA and metagenomic techniques, we comprehensively analyzed the structure and diversity of the cecal microbiota of broiler chickens (BC) and laying hens (LH). The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis showed Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the main cecal bacterial phyla in BC and LH. However, at the genus level, LH had a greater abundance of Bacteroides ( P  < 0.05), Rikenellaceae _RC9_gut_group ( P  < 0.01), Phascolarctobacterium ( P  < 0.05), Desulfovibrio ( P  < 0.05), Prevotellaceae _UCG-001 ( P  < 0.05), and unclassified_o_ Bacteroidales ( P  < 0.05), whereas BC had a greater abundance of Alistipes ( P  < 0.05), Rikenella ( P  < 0.05), Ruminococcaceae _UCG-005 ( P  < 0.05), Lachnoclostridium ( P  < 0.05), and unclassified_f_ Ruminococcaceae ( P  < 0.05). It is particularly noteworthy that the genus Desulfovibrio was significantly more abundant in the LH cecum than in the BC cecum ( P  < 0.05). A metagenomic analysis showed that the annotations in the LH dataset were significantly more abundant than in the BC dataset, and included replication, recombination and repair, energy production and transformation, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis, and amino acid transport and metabolism-related functions ( P  < 0.05). This study indicates that microbial genotypic differences in chickens of the same species can cause changes in the abundances of the gut microbiota, but do not alter the structural composition or major functional characteristics of the gut microbiota.]]></abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>31406638</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13205-019-1834-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2190-572X
ispartof 3 Biotech, 2019-08, Vol.9 (8), p.316-10, Article 316
issn 2190-572X
2190-5738
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6669222
source Springer Link; PubMed Central
subjects Abundance
Agriculture
Amino acids
Annotations
Bioinformatics
Biomaterials
Biotechnology
Cancer Research
Cecum
Cell walls
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chickens
Composition
Datasets
Desulfovibrio
Digestive system
Gastrointestinal tract
Genetic transformation
Intestinal microflora
Microbiota
Microorganisms
Original
Original Article
Poultry
Recombination
rRNA 16S
Ruminococcaceae
Sequences
Stem Cells
title Comparative metagenomic sequencing analysis of cecum microbiotal diversity and function in broilers and layers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20metagenomic%20sequencing%20analysis%20of%20cecum%20microbiotal%20diversity%20and%20function%20in%20broilers%20and%20layers&rft.jtitle=3%20Biotech&rft.au=Qi,%20Zhao&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=316-10&rft.artnum=316&rft.issn=2190-572X&rft.eissn=2190-5738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13205-019-1834-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2267435999%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f39fe9569a44b278bc790e1a271659df3880d9fbdba3b41a2c2288c8c12695223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267435999&rft_id=info:pmid/31406638&rfr_iscdi=true