Loading…
The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review
Purpose In occupational rehabilitation, the biopsychosocial model endorses the role of social factors in worker recovery. We conducted a systematic review to explore three questions examining the role of social support for the return-to-work (RTW) of individuals with work-related injury: (1) What ar...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2019-09, Vol.29 (3), p.636-659 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21e9b3a2002f29bd5b5aa57f993bd0e88f29adf1378751ebf86fc5c8e7d090573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21e9b3a2002f29bd5b5aa57f993bd0e88f29adf1378751ebf86fc5c8e7d090573 |
container_end_page | 659 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 636 |
container_title | Journal of occupational rehabilitation |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | White, Codi Green, Rebecca A. Ferguson, Samantha Anderson, Sarah L. Howe, Caroline Sun, Jing Buys, Nicholas |
description | Purpose
In occupational rehabilitation, the biopsychosocial model endorses the role of social factors in worker recovery. We conducted a systematic review to explore three questions examining the role of social support for the return-to-work (RTW) of individuals with work-related injury: (1) What are the worker-identified social barriers and facilitators in RTW; (2) What is the relationship between social factors and RTW; and (3) What is the effectiveness of social interventions for RTW.
Methods
Systematic searches of six databases were conducted for each research question. These identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria for Research Question 1, and 12 studies for Research Question 2. No studies were identified that met inclusion criteria for Research Question 3. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse the included studies.
Results
Research Question 1 identified five themes in social barriers and facilitators to RTW, including
contact
/
communication, person-centred approaches, mutual trust, reaction to injury
, and
social relationships
. Research Question 2 identified moderate support for
reaction to injury
and
social integration
/
functioning
as predictors of RTW and weak evidence for
co-worker support
. Four studies reported significant associations between social factors and RTW, six reported mixed findings with at least one significant social predictor, and two found no significant relationships. However, conclusions were limited by the inconsistency in measurement of social factors.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that social support and integration may influence RTW following work-related injury, and highlights the need for further systematic examination of social factors in the field of occupational rehabilitation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6675768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714971479</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714971479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21e9b3a2002f29bd5b5aa57f993bd0e88f29adf1378751ebf86fc5c8e7d090573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt1q3DAQhU1padK0L9CLIuhNbpxK_pPVi8ISmnYhEEhSeilkebSrrS1tJXmTPErftrPZ_DSlFGM8zHznmBlOlr1l9IhRyj9ERkXR5JS1ORUtVtfPsn1W8zIvm7Z9jjWty5xWLd_LXsW4ohQxXrzM9kracMZ5tZ_9ulwCmTszTOA0EG_IhddWDeRiWq99SES5_r41dwkWQSXrHTlROvkQCZbnkKbgSPLkuw8_yNmUtB8hEuMDSnq7sf2khkiubFreIvk5DCpBj9PVFCzEj2RGLm5ighHNNRpuLFy9zl4YlMGbu-9B9u3k8-Xx1_z07Mv8eHaa67piKS8YiK5UBaWFKUTX112tVM2NEGXXU2hb7KresJK3vGbQmbYxutYt8J4Kisc6yD7tfNdTN0KvwaWgBrkOdlThRnpl5dOJs0u58BvZNLzmTYsGh3cGwf-cICY52qhhGJQDP0VZMC6qRlRii77_C115vB2uh1QjakpZWT9SCzWAtM54_K_emsoZZ5XAlwukjv5B4dPDaLV3YCz2nwiKnUAHH2MA87Ajo3IbKLkLlMRAydtAyWsUvfvzOg-S-wQhUO6AiCO3gPC40n9sfwOYGthw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2169500135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>White, Codi ; Green, Rebecca A. ; Ferguson, Samantha ; Anderson, Sarah L. ; Howe, Caroline ; Sun, Jing ; Buys, Nicholas</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Codi ; Green, Rebecca A. ; Ferguson, Samantha ; Anderson, Sarah L. ; Howe, Caroline ; Sun, Jing ; Buys, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In occupational rehabilitation, the biopsychosocial model endorses the role of social factors in worker recovery. We conducted a systematic review to explore three questions examining the role of social support for the return-to-work (RTW) of individuals with work-related injury: (1) What are the worker-identified social barriers and facilitators in RTW; (2) What is the relationship between social factors and RTW; and (3) What is the effectiveness of social interventions for RTW.
Methods
Systematic searches of six databases were conducted for each research question. These identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria for Research Question 1, and 12 studies for Research Question 2. No studies were identified that met inclusion criteria for Research Question 3. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse the included studies.
Results
Research Question 1 identified five themes in social barriers and facilitators to RTW, including
contact
/
communication, person-centred approaches, mutual trust, reaction to injury
, and
social relationships
. Research Question 2 identified moderate support for
reaction to injury
and
social integration
/
functioning
as predictors of RTW and weak evidence for
co-worker support
. Four studies reported significant associations between social factors and RTW, six reported mixed findings with at least one significant social predictor, and two found no significant relationships. However, conclusions were limited by the inconsistency in measurement of social factors.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that social support and integration may influence RTW following work-related injury, and highlights the need for further systematic examination of social factors in the field of occupational rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0487</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-3688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30671774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Clinical Psychology ; Environmental Health ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Injuries ; Integration ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Occupational Injuries - psychology ; Occupational Injuries - rehabilitation ; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine ; Orthopedics ; Rehabilitation ; Return to Work - psychology ; Return to Work - statistics & numerical data ; Review ; Social factors ; Social Integration ; Social interactions ; Social networks ; Social Support ; Systematic review ; Work-related injuries</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019-09, Vol.29 (3), p.636-659</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21e9b3a2002f29bd5b5aa57f993bd0e88f29adf1378751ebf86fc5c8e7d090573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21e9b3a2002f29bd5b5aa57f993bd0e88f29adf1378751ebf86fc5c8e7d090573</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6977-9468</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2169500135/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2169500135?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11668,21374,27903,27904,33590,33591,36039,36040,43712,44342,73968,74642</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30671774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Codi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howe, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buys, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review</title><title>Journal of occupational rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Occup Rehabil</addtitle><addtitle>J Occup Rehabil</addtitle><description>Purpose
In occupational rehabilitation, the biopsychosocial model endorses the role of social factors in worker recovery. We conducted a systematic review to explore three questions examining the role of social support for the return-to-work (RTW) of individuals with work-related injury: (1) What are the worker-identified social barriers and facilitators in RTW; (2) What is the relationship between social factors and RTW; and (3) What is the effectiveness of social interventions for RTW.
Methods
Systematic searches of six databases were conducted for each research question. These identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria for Research Question 1, and 12 studies for Research Question 2. No studies were identified that met inclusion criteria for Research Question 3. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse the included studies.
Results
Research Question 1 identified five themes in social barriers and facilitators to RTW, including
contact
/
communication, person-centred approaches, mutual trust, reaction to injury
, and
social relationships
. Research Question 2 identified moderate support for
reaction to injury
and
social integration
/
functioning
as predictors of RTW and weak evidence for
co-worker support
. Four studies reported significant associations between social factors and RTW, six reported mixed findings with at least one significant social predictor, and two found no significant relationships. However, conclusions were limited by the inconsistency in measurement of social factors.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that social support and integration may influence RTW following work-related injury, and highlights the need for further systematic examination of social factors in the field of occupational rehabilitation.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Occupational Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Occupational Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Return to Work - psychology</subject><subject>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social Integration</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Work-related injuries</subject><issn>1053-0487</issn><issn>1573-3688</issn><issn>1573-3688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt1q3DAQhU1padK0L9CLIuhNbpxK_pPVi8ISmnYhEEhSeilkebSrrS1tJXmTPErftrPZ_DSlFGM8zHznmBlOlr1l9IhRyj9ERkXR5JS1ORUtVtfPsn1W8zIvm7Z9jjWty5xWLd_LXsW4ohQxXrzM9kracMZ5tZ_9ulwCmTszTOA0EG_IhddWDeRiWq99SES5_r41dwkWQSXrHTlROvkQCZbnkKbgSPLkuw8_yNmUtB8hEuMDSnq7sf2khkiubFreIvk5DCpBj9PVFCzEj2RGLm5ighHNNRpuLFy9zl4YlMGbu-9B9u3k8-Xx1_z07Mv8eHaa67piKS8YiK5UBaWFKUTX112tVM2NEGXXU2hb7KresJK3vGbQmbYxutYt8J4Kisc6yD7tfNdTN0KvwaWgBrkOdlThRnpl5dOJs0u58BvZNLzmTYsGh3cGwf-cICY52qhhGJQDP0VZMC6qRlRii77_C115vB2uh1QjakpZWT9SCzWAtM54_K_emsoZZ5XAlwukjv5B4dPDaLV3YCz2nwiKnUAHH2MA87Ajo3IbKLkLlMRAydtAyWsUvfvzOg-S-wQhUO6AiCO3gPC40n9sfwOYGthw</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>White, Codi</creator><creator>Green, Rebecca A.</creator><creator>Ferguson, Samantha</creator><creator>Anderson, Sarah L.</creator><creator>Howe, Caroline</creator><creator>Sun, Jing</creator><creator>Buys, Nicholas</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-9468</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review</title><author>White, Codi ; Green, Rebecca A. ; Ferguson, Samantha ; Anderson, Sarah L. ; Howe, Caroline ; Sun, Jing ; Buys, Nicholas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21e9b3a2002f29bd5b5aa57f993bd0e88f29adf1378751ebf86fc5c8e7d090573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Occupational Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Occupational Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Return to Work - psychology</topic><topic>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social Integration</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Work-related injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Codi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howe, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buys, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Codi</au><au>Green, Rebecca A.</au><au>Ferguson, Samantha</au><au>Anderson, Sarah L.</au><au>Howe, Caroline</au><au>Sun, Jing</au><au>Buys, Nicholas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational rehabilitation</jtitle><stitle>J Occup Rehabil</stitle><addtitle>J Occup Rehabil</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>636</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>636-659</pages><issn>1053-0487</issn><issn>1573-3688</issn><eissn>1573-3688</eissn><abstract>Purpose
In occupational rehabilitation, the biopsychosocial model endorses the role of social factors in worker recovery. We conducted a systematic review to explore three questions examining the role of social support for the return-to-work (RTW) of individuals with work-related injury: (1) What are the worker-identified social barriers and facilitators in RTW; (2) What is the relationship between social factors and RTW; and (3) What is the effectiveness of social interventions for RTW.
Methods
Systematic searches of six databases were conducted for each research question. These identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria for Research Question 1, and 12 studies for Research Question 2. No studies were identified that met inclusion criteria for Research Question 3. A narrative synthesis approach was used to analyse the included studies.
Results
Research Question 1 identified five themes in social barriers and facilitators to RTW, including
contact
/
communication, person-centred approaches, mutual trust, reaction to injury
, and
social relationships
. Research Question 2 identified moderate support for
reaction to injury
and
social integration
/
functioning
as predictors of RTW and weak evidence for
co-worker support
. Four studies reported significant associations between social factors and RTW, six reported mixed findings with at least one significant social predictor, and two found no significant relationships. However, conclusions were limited by the inconsistency in measurement of social factors.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that social support and integration may influence RTW following work-related injury, and highlights the need for further systematic examination of social factors in the field of occupational rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30671774</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-9468</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-0487 |
ispartof | Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019-09, Vol.29 (3), p.636-659 |
issn | 1053-0487 1573-3688 1573-3688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6675768 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); SPORTDiscus with Full Text |
subjects | Analysis Clinical Psychology Environmental Health Health Psychology Humans Injuries Integration Medicine Medicine & Public Health Occupational Injuries - psychology Occupational Injuries - rehabilitation Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine Orthopedics Rehabilitation Return to Work - psychology Return to Work - statistics & numerical data Review Social factors Social Integration Social interactions Social networks Social Support Systematic review Work-related injuries |
title | The Influence of Social Support and Social Integration Factors on Return to Work Outcomes for Individuals with Work-Related Injuries: A Systematic Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A32%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Social%20Support%20and%20Social%20Integration%20Factors%20on%20Return%20to%20Work%20Outcomes%20for%20Individuals%20with%20Work-Related%20Injuries:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20rehabilitation&rft.au=White,%20Codi&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=636&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=636-659&rft.issn=1053-0487&rft.eissn=1573-3688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA714971479%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-21e9b3a2002f29bd5b5aa57f993bd0e88f29adf1378751ebf86fc5c8e7d090573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2169500135&rft_id=info:pmid/30671774&rft_galeid=A714971479&rfr_iscdi=true |